User talk:Adamant.pwn/Archive 1

Use Latex for your graphical diagram
Hello Adamant.pwn,

The graphic diagram you added to the Bernstein–Vazirani algorithm should be in latex. This makes it easier for the reader to parse it. Your diagram also goes off the page. Please fix that formatting error at least. Let me know what questions you have.

Thanks, Vtomole (talk) 14:30, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Victory! I see the issue. The image actually has latex source, but it's written in tikz-cd. Do you have any suggestions on converting it into wiki-compatible one? $$\texttt{adamant}$$(talk/contribs) 14:54, 12 December 2019 (UTC)


 * can you help me here, please? $$\texttt{adamant}$$(talk/contribs) 16:01, 14 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Looks like it only goes off the page on my mobile device but not on the desktop. Maybe turning your diagram to an image of a quantum circuit will make it compatible with all devices. We can emulate 'Figure 1' of http://people.cs.uchicago.edu/~ftchong/33001/lecture08.pdf Vtomole (talk)


 * What exactly do you mean here? To reduce the width of the image? I actually wanted to emulate FIG.3 from, i.e. with transforms explicitly written on the diagram, but still not sure what's the best way to rewrite it in wikipedia-compatible latex... $$\texttt{adamant}$$(talk/contribs) 17:08, 16 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Reducing the width is preferable. Maybe the same width as the quantum circuit image that is on the top right of the page? Vtomole (talk)

January 2019
Hello, I'm Mahveotm. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Resultant— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Mahveotm (talk) 22:33, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

excuse me, but my edit was constructive. Current formula is wrong and I explained it in comment section in my edit. If $$\deg C = \deg A - \deg B$$ and $$c_0 = a_0/b_0$$ then degree of $$A-CB$$ will be less than $$d=\deg A$$ and it will change the value of resultant. Adamant.pwn (talk) 22:39, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Apologies. Welcome to Wikipedia! Mahveotm (talk) 22:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!
Welcome to Wikipedia, Adamant.pwn! Thank you for your contributions. I am Mahveotm and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Questions or type at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes ( ~ ); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Mahveotm (talk) 22:52, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

DYK for Berlekamp's root finding algorithm
Vanamonde (Talk) 00:01, 24 August 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Berlekamp's root finding algorithm
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Berlekamp's root finding algorithm you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jakob.scholbach -- Jakob.scholbach (talk) 14:02, 17 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi again, I have reviewed the article, have a look! Best, Jakob.scholbach (talk) 19:06, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Berlekamp's root finding algorithm
The article Berlekamp's root finding algorithm you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Berlekamp's root finding algorithm for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jakob.scholbach -- Jakob.scholbach (talk) 19:22, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Suffix automaton
Hello! Your submission of Suffix automaton at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) at your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Yoninah (talk) 13:02, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Berlekamp's root finding algorithm
The article Berlekamp's root finding algorithm you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Berlekamp's root finding algorithm for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jakob.scholbach -- Jakob.scholbach (talk) 19:41, 22 September 2019 (UTC)


 * Hi adamant, I have failed your nomination per your request. If you don't actually plan to work on a nomination I would rather encourage you not to nominate it in the first place. After all I (as a reviewer) have spent quite some time reading and assessing your nominated article which is now of little effect. Best, Jakob.scholbach (talk) 19:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC)