User talk:Adambro/Archive 2

=5 January 2007=

need help
Hi!!

I need ur help or want to know catgeroize the article. u can talk to me thru google talk. my id : rajroshan at gmail dot com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Rajeshroshan (talk • contribs) 06:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC).

=8 January 2007=

Paradise Wildlife Park
Hello Adam

I think you deleted my new page about Paradise Wildlife Park and after reading the message you sent to me, I can see why!

I don't think I had the right idea about Wikipedia but am keen to rectify my mistake. If I publish items about the conservation work they do at the Park, would that keep me within the correct usage of wikipedia?

Karen —Preceding unsigned comment added by Karenpwp (talk • contribs) 18:57, 8 January 2007

=13 January 2007=

Uncategorized?
Stubs are categories; you shouldn't be adding an uncategorized tag to articles that are marked as stubs. Only articles without category tags and without stub tags should be marked as uncategorized. Kafziel Talk 15:53, 13 January 2007 (UTC)


 * I don't think I would agree with this. Whilst declaring an article as a stub, adds it to the Category:Stubs, I don't think this can be seen as removing the reasoning behind tagging an article as uncategorized. I think this view is supported by the existence of a Category:Uncategorized stubs. Of course, if you could point out any specific guidelines regarding this, I would appreciate your help. Adambro 16:12, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Uncategorized stubs are for stubs that are not sorted further into categories. This is not the case with the articles you've been tagging. For instance, puts an article into the category of Category:Kerala geography stubs, as specific a category as any other. Same goes for  or  . Those are categories. Even a simple  tag is a category. Although it should be categorized further if possible, placing a tag on it is not necessary. Kafziel Talk 16:31, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I'm still not entirely sure about this. I guess the real question is, does a stub category count as a 'real' category. The text on the template, Uncategorizedstub would suggest it doesn't as it indicates that the article in question should be improved by "adding it to one or more categories, in addition to a stub category". Also, may I suggest that you should have discussed this with me before reverting my edits especially as some of them were more than just adding an uncategorized tag. Adambro 16:51, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * The answer is yes, a stub category does qualify as a "real" category. That's not really up for debate. A category is a category. In theory they're not meant to be permanent, but they are categories and tagging them just increases the backlog of supposedly uncategorized articles while doing nothing to actually improve the situation. I'm not sure what evidence you're looking for. Perhaps Stub sorting will help? There are also two comments on the subject at Template talk:Uncategorized. I guess confusion is rare enough that nobody has bothered to annotate the actual template, but not so rare as to be unheard-of. It's really not that a big of a deal, as long as you understand now.
 * Sorry about the reverts; you were using AWB and therefore moving very quickly. I had to edit fast to keep up while I waited for a reply (I left the message on your talk page right after my first revert). I will replace the other fixes I may have removed. Kafziel Talk 17:08, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Ok, thanks for clearing that up. I'll refrain from adding uncategorized to stubs in future. Understand regarding AWB, I guess maybe I should look into how I can stop it suggesting adding uncatergorized to stubs. Thanks again. Adambro 17:52, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Glad I could help! Kafziel Talk 18:22, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Adambro! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Prodego talk  16:48, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

User_talk:Ryanpostlethwaite
Cheers for reverting my user talk page, I've given Hellerthere a final warning for making personal attacks. Thanks again Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 20:16, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
 * No problem. Glad I could help. Adambro 20:19, 13 January 2007 (UTC)

=14 January 2007=

My editor review
Many thanks for reverting the edits on my editor review, somehow I don't think those comments were going to help me be a better editor! Your probably sick of reverting all the rubbish that comes my way by now! Ryan Postlethwaite See the mess I've created or let's have banter 17:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Happy to help. Hope your editor review provides you with some useful feedback. Keep up the good work with regards to fighting vandalism. Vandal fighting exposes us to some of the worst of Wikipedia but our efforts really do help. Adambro 17:51, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Wdefcon
Would you consider taking WikiDefCon off your userpage, as this protects it from editing by innocent RC patrollers such as me. Thanks!

 T  yson Moore   18:11, 14 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Have done. Hope that helps. I presume its because my userpage is protected. Adambro 18:26, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

=15 January 2007=

Hi
Hello how r u? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Clifford70 (talk • contribs) 15:24, 15 January 2007
 * Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia. Adambro 15:32, 15 January 2007 (UTC)

=16 January 2006=

Auto Wiki Browser
Please do not use this tool to correct speeling mistakes on talk pages, or otherwise alter people's signed comments. - brenneman  14:50, 16 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Yeah sorry about that. Thought I'd filtered out all such pages but that one caught me out. Got it sorted now though. Thanks for reverting it. Adambro 14:58, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

=19 January 2006=

Adambro
I got your message, but was very offended by your calling my insights "vandalism". Being gay is a lifestlye and their is no nonsense about it. I was wondering, however, if you really consider monitoring Wikipedia all day having a life. Maybe you should quit peeing on my campfire and think about the last time you got laid and if you ever will again if you sit your fruity British arse in front of a computer all the time looking at Wikipedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zenabi (talk • contribs) 20:15, 19 January 2007
 * Thanks for your comments. I have replied on your talk page. Adambro 20:34, 19 January 2007 (UTC)

=21 January 2006=

Humancar
Yes, Thanks ADAMBRO -In reference to Humancar- I am the author of the content as well as the site and will rewrite to fit Wiki- appreciate the Immediate feedback. Flash —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Flashthedog (talk • contribs) 17:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC).
 * I'm nota Adambro and he will answer better then me, but I have to mention WP:COI... by Snowolf (talk) on  17:12, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Snowolf makes a good point. If you are going to create an article about a project you are involved in then you would be seen to have a conflict of interest. This is important because Wikipedia strives to maintain a neutral point of view. I feel that copying info straight from your website, which one would assume is aimed at promoting your project, leaves doubts as to whether the article complies with the neutral point of view guidelines. I would suggest you try to rewrite the article in accordance with the Manual of Style and from a neutral point of view. If you intend to do this, you should place at the top of the page and explain your intention on the talk page. This will prevent the article from being deleted. Thanks. Adambro 18:22, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Huddersfield
Hi, local discussion forums for local media are not encyclopaedic and have no place here. See WP:EL. BlueValour 22:35, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks for pointing that out. I should have looked at the nature of the website instead of merely correcting the typo. It seems the guy who originally added the website, albeit with an incorrect URL, is in fact the owner of the website, so I have posted a message on his talk page about the conflict of interest and asked him to stop adding links to his own websites. He's made similar contributions to other articles so I suspect these should also be removed but I'd like to hear your opinion. The username is Jkettle. Adambro 22:46, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I've now gone ahead and removed the links from other articles to the various websites he owns according to WHOIS searches. Thanks for your help and guidance. Adambro 23:09, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your good work. BlueValour 23:15, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

=23 January 2006=

Random comments from vandals
it does suck... it's not the same without Paul Heyman. Vince McMahon ruins everything! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kipjames (talk • contribs) 19:45, 23 January 2007

You are an oversensitive, self-important ass. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.228.222.112 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 23 January 2007

=24 January 2006=

thanks
thanks, I've blocked him (previous vandalism) jimfbleak 10:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

NPWatcher approval
You've been approved to use NPWatcher. Please give me any feature requests or bugs. I'm also happy to help if you have any problems running the program, or any questions :). Before you run the program, please check the changelog on the application page to see if I've made a new release (or just add the main page (here) to your watchlist).  Finally, enjoy! Mart inp23  17:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Blade Runner
Thank you for the advice :) I was wondering why it didn't appear :) Broken soul 19:12, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Re. Request for semi-protection of my user page
Oh. You're quite right actually, I had a wrong notion of user page protection upon request apparently. I apologize and will protect your user page now. Thanks for contacting me. Regards, Hús  ö  nd  20:43, 24 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help. Adambro 20:46, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

=25 January 2006=

Thanks for the User Page revert!
Hello! Just wanted to thank you for reverting Annatekera's vandalism on my user page! -- GJD 21:52, 25 January 2007 (UTC)


 * No problem. It has been very busy on the recent changes patrol this evening, just one of many pages I've had to revert. Adambro 21:55, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

Take That page
How is it vandalism is it's true ? Nobody in the USA ever heard of Take That.

But anyway. I'll move on to the next Brit band that nobody here ever heard of. like Westlame.

See ya there. : ) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.67.199.176 (talk) 22:16, 25 January 2007 (UTC).

BTW
Loved that reply to the "vandal" who suggested what you should do with your spare time, and with parts of your anatomy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.67.199.176 (talk • contribs) 22:20, 25 January 2007

=26 January 2007=

Hi
I didn't mean to be vandal, but i can make more good postses. I will tri to make good post in future. Please dont ban me i make good postsess, and never more vanadal —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.171.152.18 (talk • contribs) 08:50, 26 January 2007


 * Hi are u ther —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.171.152.18 (talk • contribs) 08:55, 26 January 2007


 * Thank you for your comment. I look forward to seeing some constructive edits. I would suggest you read some basics about Wikipedia to get a better understanding of the project. If you need any further assitance, please let me know. Thanks. Adambro 09:00, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


 * okey will make better editses in the futre time of wikiperdia, Lets bi frends —Preceding unsigned comment added by 159.171.152.18 (talk • contribs) 09:10, 26 January 2007

HELP!!
You warned off serial vandal User talk:209.7.96.2 on 17th. He's virtually nuking the Nuclear Weapon page and using it for chat with someone else in the text. I can't even keep up with the pranks...Help! HJ 21:04, 26 January 2007 (UTC)


 * User is now blocked. Adambro 21:10, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Thanks...I could not literally keep up and he was virtually laughing at reverts and warningsHJ 21:16, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

=27 January 2007=

really sorry
what can I say... I'm really sorry... that's all... I was very much aware that it was Vandalism... but I still did it... Sorry again... i won't repeat it again...

so here's something you should know...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maumoon

^this article... it is a primary target to vandalism by Maldivians quite a lot... and you wouldnt even know if the information given is true or not... cuz some stuff r in our langue...

keep an eye....

bye —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 210.211.225.119 (talk) 09:10, 27 January 2007 (UTC).

RE: Katy Deacon Page
Hi, Thanks for your message.

I am currently rewriting the article.

Thanks again. Mataw 17:37, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Edit: I've re-written the article, please do let me know if I've made sufficient change. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mataw (talk • contribs) 17:37, 27 January 2007


 * Thanks. I have responded on your talk page. Adambro 18:20, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

wiki
Sure thanks for the greeting. What i wrote on the Take That page was "truth" and "fact" you call it vandalism.

It's your website. you decide what is truth and anything outside of that is vandalism. I understand. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.67.199.176 (talk • contribs) 22:07, 27 January 2007


 * What you added were not facts, they were your point of view. As I've mentioned before, Wikipedia has a strict policy about maintaining a neutral point of view and adding your own personal opinions to pages is clearly against this. If you add controversial info to an article, you also need to be able to provide citations which support the edit. Adambro 22:45, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

=28 January 2007=

Sheffield Midland
I'm sorry i took so long to reply. I opposed because i thought the historic name was in common usage. Many pages are moved basedon commonality and i have heard both. So i could change my vote to neutral. Simply south 23:52, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for explaining what made you come to your decision. It does seem the Sheffield Midland is quite common but I can't find that on any official documents, timetables etc. My opinion is that the title of the page should be the official name with appropriate redirects from any other names used. Adambro 13:01, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

=31 January 2007=

My vandalism?
Hey,

I'm sure I've never been on that Looking Glass page, let alone add random vandalism to it.

What did I apparently do?

193.63.48.48 12:26, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

Oops
Sorry, I'm on a public computer. It wasnt me, just some ponce. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.63.48.48 (talk • contribs) 12:28, 31 January 2007