User talk:Adamm

Welcome
Hello ,

I see you've been editing since the end of last year, but have yet to be officially welcomed. Well, I'd like to welcome you and thank you for your contributions.

These links might help you with your contributions:
 * Tutorial
 * Manual of Style
 * Policies and Guidelines

For Wikipedia-wide involvement, visit the Community Portal and the Village Pump.

Be sure to check out Australian resources, like The Australia Wikiportal, Australian Wikipedians' Notice Board, Australian Collaboration of the Fortnight, New Australian Articles and Australian stub articles.

To add yourself to a list Victorian Wikipedians, insert the following on your user page:

Also, seeing as though you're a Melburnian, you might like to consider participating in WikiProject Melbourne? Help is always needed!

By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;. Preferably, use four tildes (&#126;&#126;&#126;&#126;), which produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page.

Again, welcome.--Cyberjunkie | Talk 07:53, 7 August 2005 (UTC)

Vandalism
Why did you erase my modifications to List of closed Melbourne railway stations?? Somerton is on the Craigieburn line and is also the junction of a disused line that goes for several kms to join up with the Upfield line. It is nowhere near Upfield station. Please stop vandalising the wiki. Somebody in the WWW 08:19, 30 September 2005 (UTC)


 * You wrote that I altered your entry in Closed Melbourne Lines, to wit the Somerton Line. I did no such thing intentionally.  I added information regarding the closed St Kilda-Windsor loop line.  I know nothing about the Somerton Line, and would not enter in anything about which I have little or no knowledge.  If my actions somehow erased your entry then I have no idea how this happened, but please accept my apologies. Nevertheless I suggest that a polite enquiry might be more appropriate rather than accusing someone of vandalism.  I respectfully draw your attention to Please do not bite the newcomers, and  dispute resolution.  On the other hand, I am keen to know more about closed railway lines, and will look for your entries on the subject.  As it is a subject we are both interested in it would be a pity to be engaged in pointless squabbles.  adamm 02:57, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Well sorry, I was slightly in a bad mood because of some bleeps who erase changes for absolutely no reason just to be annoying. Somebody in the WWW 04:25, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

Nurse
There's a message for you on the Nurse talk page. THB 03:19, 25 February 2006 (UTC)

Unilateral removal of the history section in ABC article
Hi Adamm

We have an unpleasant situation about to develop over this action by one "cyberjunkie" ("cj"), who decided all of a sudden that he'd move the entire History section of the ABC article to a new daughter article, without replacing it with a summary. The history section was almost entirely written more than a year ago.

Since this action on 12 September, the section has languished with no text at all under its title, save a link to the daughter article.The action has, in effect, gutted the article, leaving what appear to be insubstantial fragments without a core. It's must be odd to the newcomer to be denied a summary of the history and to move straight onto a chunky section on "funding and relationship with government" without knowing where how the institution arose.

Now, it's not that I disagree with him that the History section was written in greater detail than you'd normally expect in summary style. (A related issue is that the rest of the article may need to be fleshed out in the opposite direction to achieve satisfactory summary coverage of the topic—perhaps the optimal balance needs to be debated on the talk page.) What I do object to is
 * (1) his failure to raise the matter on the talk page beforehand, and
 * (2) provide replacement text with the summary style that he's using as his stated rationale for the removal.

The edit comment for the removal was "split (will summarise later)", whereas I'd have been pleased to see a summary written before the removal, for immediate replacement.

I've raised the matter on the talk page, and Cyberjunkie has responded negatively:

I think a total blank is worse than a long history. Please create a summary soon. Your action has resulted in damage to the overall article, IMV. Tony 11:16, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

Whereas, I disagree. --cj | talk 12:41, 12 November 2006 (UTC)

I can see that this is getting nowhere. I wonder whether you agree that he should either undertake to write a summary section in the near future (I suggest three or four paragraphs) or reinstate the text and raise the issue on the talk page.

I'd appreciate knowing your opinion. The ABC's talk page is here. Tony 14:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your response. I certainly won't be asking this person's permission to write the summary (why on earth would I?). He undetook to write it, and hasn't done so after a month, leaving a damaged article. I'll be replacing the text by the end of the week if there's no summary.


 * Frankly, I'm fed up with his arrogant, sometimes threatening behaviour. At the end of my fuse with him. Tony 23:45, 12 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Yeah, sometimes I lose it when a situation passes a certain point. Best I remain distant from the text at issue for the time being—that's not hard, since the problem is, at least, not as glaring as it was! Tony 06:46, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

Userbox
Hi, it has been brought to my attention that the image you are using in the La Trobe University userbox is fair use and cannot therefore be used on a userpage. I would appreciate if you could remove it. Thankyou. Viridae Talk 11:49, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
 * New box here: User La Trobe. ~ trialsanderrors 07:08, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Thanks to both for your polite and positive way of straightening out an error on my part - greatly appreciated. Adamm 06:31, 23 November 2006 (UTC)


 * No problems, I had made the same error. Viridae Talk 06:42, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Invite to Nursing wikiproject
 Hello, this is an invitation to join WikiProject Nursing.

You may be interested in joining WikiProject Nursing. This WikiProject aims to improve the standard of all aritcles relating to Nursing, which includes articles which directly relate to the Nursing profession, including its history, the duties and activities of nurses, their role in the general field of medicine, and all related articles.

You can help by:
 * Creating new articles.
 * Expanding stubs.
 * Adding photographs.
 * Referencing articles.
 * Research topics.
 * Anything else really...

For more information, see the project page, and if you have any questions you can leave them at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Nursing and someone will get back to you.  &mdash; Rod talk 18:42, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Roo
Hi Adam. No I don't mind at all. I hadn't actually picked up that they were different years when I did the edit, I'd been focussing on IMDB having a full date and place of birth death as opposed to just a year. IMDB is often wrong and I'd take use itsanhonour if there was a dicrepancy. Cheers. PS: any photos? Moondyne 10:43, 12 September 2008 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Stjameslogo.gif
Thank you for uploading File:Stjameslogo.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 09:55, 12 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:55, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have (or very recently had) enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer have them marked as minor by default.

For established users such as yourself there is a workaround available involving custom JavaScript. If you are familiar with the contents of WP:MINOR, and believe that it is still beneficial to the encyclopedia to have all your edits marked as such by default, then this discussion will give you the details you need to continue with this functionality indefinitely. If you have any problems, feel free to drop me a note.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 19:24, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Wikipedia Day Melbourne Meetup
Hi there. Just inviting youmto the Melbourne meetup this Sunday at 11am, to celebrate our 11th anniversary. Details on that page. Hope to see you there! SteveBot (talk) 01:41, 11 January 2012 (UTC) (on behalf of Steven Zhang)

February Melbourne Meetup
Hi All. Just letting you know that we have another meetup planned for Melbourne, on Sunday, 26th February at 11am. More details can be found at the meetup page. Pizza will be provided. Look forward to seeing all of you there :-) SteveBot (talk) 22:46, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Melbourne meetup
Hey all, just a reminder that there's a meetup tomorrow at 11am in North Melbourne. There are more details at the meetup page. Hope to see you tomorrow! SteveBot (talk) 03:38, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

July WMAU Melbourne Meetup
Hi, At last month's June meetup we discussed the idea of setting up a Training Course at a University of the Third Age (U3A) to be held in 2013 and named Becoming a Wikipedia editor. In order to get this course up and running we are calling for volunteers to help develop the idea, and either tutor part of the course, or provide one on one help to students in the class. All local Wikipedians are welcome to discuss this at our 11am meetup to be held this Sunday on 22 July. Please add your name to the attending list at Meetup/Melbourne 23. Food and beverages are provided. Cuddy Wifter (talk) 03:16, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Category for Gay Wikipedians
Hello, I'm writing here to let you know that I've recently begun a discussion to review the deleted and redirected Category:Gay Wikipedians (which now points to Category:LGBT Wikipedians. instead of being it's own category) If you have the time, please add your thoughts on the deletion review to the current Discussion. Thanks! Ncboy2010 (talk) 12:40, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Meetup invitation: Melbourne 26
Hi there! You are cordially invited to a meetup next Sunday (6 January). Details and an attendee list are at Meetup/Melbourne 26. Hope to see you there! John Vandenberg 04:50, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

(this automated message was delivered using replace.py to all users in Victoria)

Bendigo workshops 2013
Can you help? Wikimedia Australia will be holding an introductory training day for editing Wikipedia and related projects. With support from La Trobe University and Bendigo Community Health Services, it is for health information professionals across the region. It will also be open to other information community groups as well (regional historic societies, librarians and the like). The workshop is on Thursday, February 21, at Latrobe University Bendigo. If you can help, please contact Leighblackall or Peterdownunder, or register directly at the Wikimedia page.--Peterdownunder (talk) 23:35, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Article assessment (waves from IRC)
FYI, the article assessments are done by the 'associated' WikiProjects listed on the article's talk page. Each one (if you go to their page linked in the 'banner') will have a method to 'request assessment'.....there's no need to do more than one. Revent (talk) 08:29, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

St James the Great, St Kilda East
No worries.--Grahame (talk) 02:04, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Just a smile to say "you're welcome"!
 Hello Adamm, I dream of horses has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Go on, smile! Cheers, and happy editing! Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message. --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a &#123;&#123;Talkback&#125;&#125; message on my talk page. @ 07:18, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Barnstar
Thank you. Nowadays I mostly work on "translating" articles (using Google) about German railway stations.--Grahame (talk) 22:57, 25 January 2015 (UTC)

Noel Ferrier
Hi, Adam, I do apologize for the less than edifying edit summary. As far as the autobiography, it was actually referenced twice. I consolidated both mentions and included everything except that which is borderline WP:OR. Yours, Quis separabit?  12:06, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Doctor Who in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Chase. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

December 2022
Your edit to List of Anglo-Catholic churches has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Sundayclose (talk) 18:34, 20 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi Sundayclose
 * Thank you for your kind message.
 * All Saints East St Kilda self identifies as Anglo Catholic on its website https://www.allsaints.org.au/about-us.html where it states explicitly "All Saints' Church stands within the Anglo-Catholic tradition of Anglicanism, with the emphasis on traditional teaching, worship, and pastoral care, including care for the disadvantaged." I look forward to your welcome advice. Adamm (talk • contribs) 11:15, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Nursing in Australia
The article Nursing in Australia you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Nursing in Australia for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of LunaEatsTuna -- LunaEatsTuna (talk) 20:23, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Nursing in Australia article assessment - August 2023
Greetings, See Talk:Nursing in Australia for article assessment details. Cheers! JoeNMLC (talk) 02:08, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Patterson Railway Station Looking North (up).jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Patterson Railway Station Looking North (up).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 17:55, 20 June 2024 (UTC)


 * I am somewhat mystified about this action because I DID add the rationale and the tag just like the following page File:Westonlangford-com-media-photos-100564.jpg I tried to do the right thing, and I note that there are a number of the Late Weston Langford's photos added in relevant pages. Adamm (talk • contribs) 03:12, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * You need to pay careful attention to the licensing of the source image. Not all Creative Commons licenses are acceptable.  Ones specifying no derivative (ND) or no commercial use (NC) are not sufficiently free for use on Wikipedia.  See WP:free licenses for a list of acceptable licenses.  The image you uploaded did not allow derivative works. -- Whpq (talk) 03:18, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Westonlangford-com-media-photos-100564.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:Westonlangford-com-media-photos-100564.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file licensed as "for non-commercial use only", "no derivative use", "for Wikipedia use only", or "used with permission"; and it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:
 * state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
 * add the relevant copyright tag and if necessary, a complete fair use rationale.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Whpq (talk) 03:18, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Note: this image is also under a no derivatives license. See the bottom of https://www.westonlangford.com/ which states -- Whpq (talk) 03:21, 21 June 2024 (UTC)


 * The website says the following which I quote verbatim
 * https://www.westonlangford.com/license/
 * "License
 * The images on this site are now licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. Essentially this means that you are free to share, copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially, subject to the following terms.
 * Attribution — You must give appropriate credit to Weston Langford, provide a link to this website and the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
 * NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
 * No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
 * Making changes in a reasonable manner includes standard image processing, including restoration, required to render the images suitable for printing. If you engage in significant 'photoshopping' of the images then you are not permitted to distribute the result without permission under the NoDerivates clause. For more information please refer to the license. The easiest way to attribute the photographs to Weston on your website is to include a link back to this website. For example if using image 100817 the link will be www.westonlangford.com/images/photo/100817/.
 * Images have embeded within them a tag that identifies Weston Langford as the artist, the Creative Commons license and other descriptive information. If you have any questions regarding this feel free to contact the site maintainer at contact@westonlangford.com." Adamm (talk • contribs) 06:04, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I have not remixed, transformed, or built upon the material.  Photographs have been displayed elswhere on Wikipedia from the same source without this high handed approach. Adamm (talk • contribs) 06:07, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * The license does not just apply to you.  It must also apply to all other reusers of Wikipedia.  Other users of Wikipedia must have the option to create derivative works.   A no derivatives license disallows that. If there are other photos from that site,  then those photos need to be reviewed for proper licensing.  -- Whpq (talk) 06:15, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Can I put a link in External links to the photos then? Adamm (talk • contribs) 06:18, 21 June 2024 (UTC)
 * That should be okay. -- Whpq (talk) 06:27, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Epworth HealthCare, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Herald.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:46, 22 June 2024 (UTC)