User talk:Adamtaubitz

Speedy deletion of Adam Taubitz
A tag has been placed on Adam Taubitz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. DiverseMentality (Boo!)  07:12, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2008
You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to No original research, Neutral point of view, and Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedians with articles.)   --Dynaflow   babble  07:16, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Adam Taubitz
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Adam Taubitz, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://adamtaubitz.com/biography.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 07:20, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Adam Taubitz
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Adam Taubitz, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Adam Taubitz appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Adam Taubitz has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Also, was muss ich machen damit mein Artikel erscheint? (Adam Taubitz)

Urheberrechtsproblematik auf Adam Taubitz
Die Probleme mit dem Artikel sind hauptsächlich zweierlei:
 * 1) Urheberrecht: Auf Wikipedia wird bei Verdacht von Urheberrechtsverletzungen nach dem Vorsichtsprinzip gehandelt, d.h. dass wir alle potentielle Verletzungen, auf die unsere Aufmerksamkeit gezogen wird, entweder verdecken (was hier der Fall ist), oder schlichtweg löschen.
 * Authoren von Inhalt, welcher an anderen Stellen publiziert wurde, können dieser Inhalt so lizenzieren, dass er hier verwendet werden kann. Dazu gibt es zwei Wege: entweder geben Sie den Inhalt auf Ihrer eigener Website under einer Creative Commons Lizenz frei (Die Lizenz muss zwingend Aenderungen sowie kommerzielles nutzen erlauben, also entweder CC-BY oder CC-BY-SA 2.5 oder neuer), oder Sie schreiben ein E-Mail an permissions-en@wikimedia.org und geben dort den Inhalt für den Adam Taubitz Artikel frei. Dazu gibt es ein Muster.
 * Es ist aber wichtig, dass Sie korrekt ermessen, was für Rechte Sie tatsächlich freigeben, und wenn Ihre Englischkentnisse Ihnen nicht absolute Klarheit verschafft, würde ich alternativ empfehlen, auf deutsch zuerst mal permissions-de@wikimedia.org anzuschreiben und dort um Unterstützung zu bitten - Sie sollten es jedoch gleich klarstellen, dass Sie Rechte für das englische Wikipedia freigeben möchten.


 * 1) Autobiografie: Dies ist die 2. Hürde. Allgemein ist es nicht empfohlen, über sich selbst zu schreiben, da höchstwahrscheinlich die notwendige Distanz fehlt, um ein neutrales Artikel zu schreiben. Dazu kommt noch, dass alle Artikel, insbesonders für lebende Personen, durch Zitate von unabhängigen qualifizierten Quellen unterstützt werden müssen. Die Frankfurter Allgemeine zB wäre eine solche Quelle, die Webseite Ihres Jazzquartetts hingegen nicht.
 * Dies sage ich als Warnung, weil es durchaus möglich ist, vom Urheberrechts-Regen in die sogenannte "Notability"-traufe zu gehen, in anderen Worten, dass der Artikel, sobald er von der Urheberrechtsseite freigegeben wird, aus anderen Gründen zur Löschung vorgeschlagen wird.
 * Als Faustregel sollten Sie mitnehmen, das jemand sicher ein Artikel über Sie schreiben wird, wenn Sie im Englischsprachigen Raum genügend Ruf erhalten haben, hingegen ist es nicht möglich, die englische Wikipedia dazu zu brauchen, um Ihren Ruf im Englischsprachigen Raum erst mal aufzubauen. Unseres Ziel ist es grundsätzlich, vom bestehenden zu schreiben, anstatt es zu erwirken.
 * Ich bedaure es, wenn dies alles ein wenig enttäuschend ist, aber die Tendenz hier ist, dass wir immer strikter mit diesen Regeln werden, anstatt das Gegenteil. Falls ich sonst behilflich sein kann, lassen Sie es mich wissen.


 * MfG und Entschuldigung für meine miserable Grammatik, MLauba (talk) 13:20, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Hallo MLauba,

1. Ich habe dieses Artikel nicht selber geschrieben sonder es ist nur eine übersetzung. 2. Die Englische version wurde von meine Website (www.adamtaubitz.com) gelöscht!

MfG

Adam


 * Hallo Herr Taubitz,
 * Auch Uebersetzungen sind Urhebererechtlich geschützt. Wie gesagt, falls dies Ihr eigener Text ist, wäre es am einfachsten, wenn Sie den unter der Creative Commons Lizenz freigeben würden. MLauba (talk) 16:45, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Ich habe seit meinem letzten Kommentar gemerkt, dass das Artikel auf der deutschen Wikipedia über OTRS freigegeben wurde, vor einem Jahr. Dies könnte womöglich eine Grundlage für die Uebersetzung hier dienen, und die Bürokratie in Schranken halten. Die Rechtslage ist jedoch ein wenig kompliziert, da Wikimedia in der Zwischenzeit die Lizenz gewechselt hat. Ich haben eine Meinungsanfrage auf WT:CP begonnen. MLauba (talk) 16:57, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Die Lage wurde geklärt und der Artikel unter der ursprünglichen Erlaubniss freigegeben. Danke für Ihre Geduld. Kann ich jedoch empfehlen, in der Zukunft unter dem User-Account Adamtaubitz zu schreiben? Danke & MfG, MLauba (talk) 18:19, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Adamtaubitz! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:45, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Adam Taubitz -

Proposed deletion of Adam Taubitz


The article Adam Taubitz has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced autobiography

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hairhorn (talk) 03:30, 7 August 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adam Taubitz


The article Adam Taubitz has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. MJ94 (talk) 21:44, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the username you have chosen (Adamtaubitz) seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this :
 * 1) It is possible that you have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization or adding links to its website.
 * 2) Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guidelines concerning editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. MJ94 (talk) 22:04, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

September 2011
This is your only warning; if you create an inappropriate page again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - F ASTILY  (TALK) 22:21, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Adam Taubitz
- SDPatrolBot (talk) 22:21, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Adam Taubitz. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's . Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 22:23, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself, as you did at Adam Taubitz, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - SDPatrolBot (talk) 22:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Reported to AIV
Hi Adamtaubitz, this is a notice to let you know that I have reported the issue of you removing speedy deletion templates to administrators. An administrator should assess the report in a short while, and they will take any appropriate actions. Please wait for an administrator before taking any further actions yourself. Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 22:27, 26 September 2011 (UTC)

Adam Taubitz
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Adam Taubitz, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 11:35, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Adam Taubitz


The article Adam Taubitz has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Self-promotional article without evidence of notability. No sources to support the claims of prizes won, and no indication how significant those prizes are.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:41, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Adam Taubitz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam Taubitz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Adam Taubitz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:46, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

Invitation to wikiFeed
Hello Adamtaubitz,

I'm part of a team that is researching ways to help Wikipedia editors find interesting content to contribute to Wikipedia. More specifically, we are investigating whether content from news sources can be used to enhance Wikipedia editing. We have created a tool, called wikiFeed, that allows you to specify Twitter and/or RSS feeds from news sources that are interesting to you. wikiFeed then helps you make connections between those feeds and Wikipedia articles. We believe that using this tool may be a lot of fun, and may help you come up with some ideas on how to contribute to Wikipedia in ways that interest you. Please participate! To do so, complete this survey and follow this link to our website. Once you're there, click the "create an account" link to get started.

For more information about wikiFeed, visit our project page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask via my talk page, or by email at wikifeedcc@gmail.com. We appreciate your time and hope you enjoy playing with wikiFeed!

Thanks! FifthCrow (talk) 21:04, 25 July 2012 (UTC)