User talk:Adamwillss

Perception systems
Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~. Please add your messages to the bottom of the talk page, or they may be overlooked. I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide adequate independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Although you gave some references, much of the text was unsourced, or was sourced to sites that can be edited by the company.
 * it's all about what the company organisation sells, little about the company itself other than locations. How many employees? Turnover? Profits? Has the company ever received negative publicity? Who are its competitors?
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: solution provider... started their journey... they expanded their business... they are providing software solution... for many popular industries... one of the leading IT Companies... many reputed companies... and is highly appreciated by users... They are honored that their application has been noticed by USA Today and considered as reliable source of checking depression...
 * the endless lists of what you sell are also spammy
 * You appear to have a conflict of interest when it comes to editing articles about this subject. If, after reading the information about notability linked above, you still believe that your organisation is notable enough for a Wikipedia article (and that there is significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources), you could, if you wish, post a request at Requested articles for the article to be created. See also Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest.

Some other points unrelated to the deletion. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  13:50, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The article title should have had both words capitalised, it's a proper noun
 * Conversely, headings should only have the first word capitalised
 * References look better with a description instead of a bare url, format is
 * I'm surprised you are using US spelling for a company based in India, where British spelling is the norm

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. -- Ed (Edgar181) 15:24, 6 April 2016 (UTC)

November 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Distilled water, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings.  Velella  Velella Talk 11:18, 5 November 2020 (UTC)