User talk:Adandavati

John Winsor
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of John Winsor, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.johnwinsor.com/about.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:58, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "John Winsor"
A page you created, John Winsor, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is a blatant copyright infringement.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you.  Falcon8765  (T ALK ) 20:59, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Adandavati (talk)
 * See also Conflict_of_interest. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:41, 17 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Your last comment is, perhaps unintentionally, ambiguous. Let me pose a straight question, to which the answer is Yes or No; have you been paid, either in cash or in kind, to edit here? --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 18:04, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If you have already appealed to the Unblock Ticket Request System and been declined you may appeal to the Arbitration Committee's Ban Appeals Subcommittee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. Daniel Case (talk) 19:39, 28 November 2014 (UTC)