User talk:Adaptogeno

Copyright issue with Systemic Theory
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Systemic Theory, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from. As a copyright violation, Systemic Theory appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Systemic Theory has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Systemic Theory and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Systemic Theory with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Systemic Theory.

However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. . -- Rick Block (talk) 04:17, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi - To use this material at Wikipedia (verbatim), you'll need to send an email to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org explaining the details (per the message above). Please note that any text contributed to Wikipedia is released under the GFDL license, which basically allows anyone else to republish it for any reason (including to make money from it) so long as they credit the original author(s) and also publish it under the GFDL.  I assume based on your user name you are somehow associated with http://adaptogeno.com (perhaps you are Jose Olalde) which brings up other issues in addition to the licensing issue.  Specifically, content contributed to Wikipedia must not be original research (see No original research), must be presented from a neutral point of view (see Neutral point of view), and must not be promotional (see What Wikipedia is not).  To help ensure compliance with these policies, contributions about yourself or your own work are highly discouraged, see Conflict of interest.  The bottom line is that it is far better to let someone else write about your work, using secondary sources, than for you to write about your work yourself.  If you have any questions about any of this, please feel free to ask me. -- Rick Block (talk) 23:29, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Hello Rick, my name is Oswaldo and I'm assisting Daniele -who is my friend- who initiated this action. Neither of us are involved with Adaptogenos. In fact, Daniele was keen in making this known since he was succesfully treated with this medicine. He rather not talk about this last. On any case he requested permission from Jose Olalde to publish the information as well as to use the images and text published in eCAM. Please help us out on as how to achieve this. For starters is this the right way to get in touch with you? Also, somebody else already included in Wikipedia (Spanish) the term adaptogeno to which Daniele added some other useful terms. See you soon....

Hi Rick

I am owner this publications and have all copyright this 4 publications

Oxford University Press Licence

License Part I 1726011314401

Licensed content author: Jose A Olalde Rangel Licensed content publicaction: Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Licensed content: Mar 2,2005 Portion of the article: Abstract

Licence Part II 1726020375846

Licensed content author: Jose A Olalde Rangel Licensed content publicaction: Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Licensed content: May 27,2005 Portion of the article: Abstract

Licence Part III 1726020512768

Licensed content author: Jose A Olalde Rangel Licensed content publicaction: Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Licensed content: Aug 20,2005 Portion of the article: Abstract

Licence Part IV 1726010772062

Licensed content author: Jose A Olalde Rangel Licensed content publicaction: Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine Licensed content: Dec,2005 Portion of the article: Abstract

Thank You

I need information about publish this concept.


 * Oswaldo - OK. Now I'm confused.  From the above it sounds like you're saying you're the owner of the copyrights to these articles.  Unless you're Jose Olalde Rangel I think this cannot be true.  Perhaps you've contacted Olalde Rangel and asked for permission to reuse this content at Wikipedia?  If so, to do this you have to send an email to permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org (as explained at Requesting copyright permission).  Because of how Wikipedia's content is licensed, if you do this you have to make it very clear to Olalde Rangel that this request is not for your personal use and not simply for republishing at Wiipedia, but to allow anyone to republish the content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License (Wikipedia's content is "free" in the sense that anyone can republish it or a changed copy, for any reason, as long as they in turn allow anyone else to republish their version).  The licensing terms at http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1142194 (not for commerical use, etc.) are NOT good enough.  Wikipedia's license allows commercial reuse, as long as the reuse is under the terms of the GFDL.


 * The page linked about shows you as the co-author, which brings up the Conflict of interest issues I previously mentioned. Again, it is far better to let someone else write about you or your work than for you to write about these things yourself.  Contributing to articles about your own work, particularly creating new articles about yourself or your work, is highly discouraged.  I'd suggest you let someone else, not as deeply involved as you appear to be, create and edit articles on this topic - although please feel free to contribute in other areas.  For more information on contributing, please see Welcoming committee/Welcome to Wikipedia.


 * As far as contacting me, just reply here (on your page). I'll notice when you change this page and reply here (that way, our conversation will be in one place).


 * By the way - to sign and date your comments on talk pages (not in article content) type "~" (four tilde characters) at the end. -- Rick Block (talk) 19:21, 13 June 2007 (UTC)