User talk:Adayding/sandbox

= Self reflection notes = To do list:

1. introduction & post-Archean TTGs

2. figure caption

3. language simplification — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adayding (talk • contribs) 06:00, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

Things to modify or add:

1. Make a table for three groups of TTGs in the Classification section;

2. Add schematic graphs for TTG geodynamic settings;

3. Maybe add a section focusing on "Dome structure" of TTG bodies;

4. Maybe add a section listing archean TTGs around the world (with age). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adayding (talk • contribs) 10:35, 22 October 2018 (UTC)

= Feedback from Jupiter = Your page is very clear and precise.

Here are some suggestions for your work:

1. You have to include your own diagram on your page, not a picture or photo. Schematic graphs for TTG geodynamic settings and sketch of TTG rock petrogenesis may be good.

2. For some sections, such as "Modern Analogy" and "Other Possible Geodynamic Settings", you may add some subsections and elaborate more on that.

3. It may be better to replace "+/-" by "±". — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jupmira104 (talk • contribs) 09:44, 23 October 2018 (UTC)

= Feedback from Michelle = HI Anyang, here are my suggestions: Best,
 * You mentioned how Archean TTGs was analogous to modern adakites in the Modern Analogy section. You may consider explaining their similarity and differences using a table instead of a paragraph.
 * You mentioned “TTGs can generally be plotted in granodiorite, tonalite, and trondhjemite regions in a QAPF diagram.”, maybe you can also make a diagram indicating the position of TTG for the general readers to have a clear understanding.
 * For the Other Possible Geodynamic Settings section, it would be great to have one or two simple diagrams showing how different groups of TTG were formed from different geodynamic settings, such as a diagram showing how low-pressure TTG is formed during underplating.

Myip003 (talk) 13:23, 22 October 2018 (UTC) = Feedback from Giovanni = Easy to read, short and to the point. Some suggestions:

1. A better presentation using tables, more graphs and less text could have made the page better.

2. A more detailed breakdown of your section could add more depth to your topic.

3. Your citations need dates for most of them.

= Feedback from Yuwei =

Hi Anyang, these are some suggestions for your page:


 * It might be easier for reading if using the point form instead of writing in one paragraph. (such as the three groups of TTGs)


 * Are section 1.2 and 1.3 belong to section 1.1 (parts of Petrogenesis)? Will they be the subtitles of 1.1?


 * Maybe it is good to have some figures for the model setting of TTG formation.