User talk:Adcomcorp

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Your ability to edit this talk page has also been revoked. If you would like to be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact ArbCom at .

For the username I can state once again, but please review the logs previous logs as I believe I have made my case.

I simply chose that name many years ago since I use a common single sign on with the name of the company in order to make my life easier.

All pages I contribute to, which you are welcome to look into, are from my personal and professional experience and are in no way intended or targeted to promote my company or generate sales. My only purpose is to contribute where I see there may be improvements...

I obtained the account initially in the very early days of the wikipedia project when username policies were not so noticably defined.

I thought of the userid as more of a Handle and did not expect this to be a problem, as it was not for many years. I had previously used identifiers in 1997-2002 as CenSys, which is a shortened version of another company for various non wikimedia sites. Going way back to the ARPANET and BBS Days, I had used the identifier or handle of internex.

I would of course prefer to keep the name as is, just because it makes my life easier and allows me to be identified by the general community and colleagues since it happens to also be on my card.

Username Issue: The user identifier was not an issue until I posted a link to my home page

Using real names is a security risk, and using cryptic aliases prevents the ability for colleagues to know who you are. Important (Why I need to be able to sign in): Out Office has have been requested by the Poznan_University_of_Medical_Sciences to all update web sites and relevant data quarterly basis, and the current data on Wikipedia is quite out of date and is missing very key information. I am the designer of the destination page linked at Section 4, Item 2, Sub-Item 1, which refers to PUMS North American Office of Admissions and Financial Aid

Additional Corrections or Additions I Need to add, after reviewing the specific Wikipedia Regulations: List of Polish People, Reference to [[Solidarity (Polish trade union) and others]]

While there is a wikipedia page for the accomplishments of Maria_Siemionow, my father also is a very important person in the history of Polish-American Affairs, Godfather to the former Polish Ambassador to Washington DC, who currently List_of_Polish_people.

While trying to of course avoid a conflict of interest, my father should be on a similar lists of awards since he is a very active persona in the community. He was offered the position of being in charge of the movement in 1989 but turned it down as it was a conflict of his association with the National Security Council. This was fortunate for him since soon after communism fell and he would have been in for a lot of work had he taken the job.

In the meantime he established a relationship with the Karol Marcinkowski University of Medical Sciences, now renamed to the Poznan Universiity of Medical Sciences.

He was the first to establish an English Language M.D. Program in Poland. He also was instrumental in getting the country of Poland approved by the US Dept. of Education as being of the same educational standards as the United States. This led to the ability for American Citizens and Permanent Residents to receive Federal Student Aid in order to pay for the programs in Poland. Once this was established, 3 other universities in Poland began their own competing programs, since my fathers efforts effected the status of the country as a whole.

If you look at the link on the Wikipedia page for [Maria_Siemionow], you will see that she has won many official awards and happens to be an important connection, especially for the US Students. There is no reason that Prof. Stan Wiktor External Google Search Linkshould not be included on this list. So far I simply do not have enough information about the rules and could use assistance in determining these possibilities.

I ask you to change the logon to my personal name although the other was preferable for simplicity, not promotion. I only made the mistake of adding a link to my business page because it has all relevant information about what I do, however I am a small business consultant and not using it for promotional type purposes.

Please review the full change log and read the comments and you can see for yourself.

I shall mention again, I am not trying to promote anything in relation to my business, it was just easier for me to use the same name since I also use it elsewhere. For example, just about ALL social network sites, msn, yahoo, google, and a lot of others.

If you review my contributions you would probably see that there is no reference to spamming of any sort... the only reason this was picked up on was because I think I started to make an about me page, simply for the purpose of linking people to my site so that they could see what my credentials are in case they were in doubt of the reliability of the information. Certainly I shall not do this again and may instead just turn on email update notifications. Please do a search on user adcomcorp and you will see it.

The annoying part is that I have had a lot that I would have been able to contribute to many pages when this account locked.

Additionally I use the other wikimedia projects as well with the same identifier. }}

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Adcomcorp


A tag has been placed on User:Adcomcorp, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 02:36, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

Your account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because it appears to be mainly intended or used for publicity and/or promotional purposes. Please read the following carefully.

Why can't I edit Wikipedia?

Your account's edits and/or username indicate that it is being used on behalf of a company, group, celebrity or other well-known individual, or organization for purposes of promotion and/or publicity. The edits may have violated one or more of our rules on spamming, which include: adding inappropriate external links, posting advertisements, and using Wikipedia for promotion. Wikipedia has many articles on companies, groups, and organizations, but it is considered inappropriate for such groups to use Wikipedia to write about themselves. In addition, usernames like yours are disallowed under our username policy.

Probably not. See WP:FAQ/Organization for a helpful list of frequently asked questions by people in your position. Also, review the conflict of interest guidance to see the kinds of limitations you would have to obey if you did want to continue editing about your company, group, or organization. If this does not fit in with your goals, then you will not be allowed to edit again. Consider using one of the many websites that allow this instead.
 * Am I allowed to make these edits if I change my username?

You are still welcome to write about something other than your company or organization. If you do intend to make useful contributions on some other topic, you must convince a Wikipedia administrator that you mean it. To that end, please do the following:
 * What can I do now?


 * Add the text on your user talk page.
 * Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:Listusers to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy.
 * Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In this reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, please see how to appeal a block. -- Orange Mike  &#x007C;   Talk  02:58, 20 November 2010 (UTC)

OK, but ... Here are a few key questions:
 * Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and not a business directory?
 * Do you understand conflict of interest?
 * Do you understand that to be considered for an encylopedia article, the subject must be considered to be notable?

You are currently blocked because your username appears directly related to a company, group or product that you have been promoting, contrary to the username policy. Changing the username will not allow you to violate the 3 important principles above. Daniel Case (talk) 06:09, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference
Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to  in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer be able to have them marked as minor by default. For more information on what a minor edit is, see WP:MINOR or feel to get in touch.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 23:43, 13 March 2011 (UTC)