User talk:Addeps3

Welcome!

 * }

June 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Long Beach International Karate Championships has been reverted. Your edit here to Long Beach International Karate Championships was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bl1JmE8QGVg&feature=player_embedded) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:48, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stefan nikander


A tag has been placed on Stefan nikander requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Rangilo Gujarati ( talk ) 22:53, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation
 You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia&. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Jarkeld (talk) 23:01, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Joey Diaz
Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Joey Diaz, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because the information you provided in the citation is insufficient to allow readers to verify the material.

In addition, Wikipedia needs to be written in a formal tone. This means, among other things, we do not refer to subjects by given name, as indicated by WP:SURNAME.

If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. :-) Nightscream (talk) 02:00, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

September 2017
Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you removed topically-relevant content from Ejaculation. However, Wikipedia is not censored to remove content that might be considered objectionable. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Please discuss the issue on the article's talk page. Sum mer PhD v2.0 13:36, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 13:53, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Ejaculation. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. DMacks (talk) 13:58, 25 September 2017 (UTC)


 * addeps3: "Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Ejaculation. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism."
 * The only record me editing Talk:Ejaculation is adding 480 characters, despite you trying to spin it as a deletion of users' text. The pornography will be taken down.


 * Here is you removing my response to your comment. Are you incapable of signing your posts?--it's a behavioral expectation. DMacks (talk) 14:11, 25 September 2017 (UTC)


 * In this edit, while attempting to incorrectly move your topic back to the top of the talk page (new topics go at the bottom), you removed another editor's reply to your comment. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 14:13, 25 September 2017 (UTC)


 * adde:I was reverting the photos/videos of porn being reuploaded, I didnt know comments disappeared, but Ive learned now how to revert and retain your comments, thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Addeps3 (talk • contribs) 10:26, September 25, 2017 (UTC)


 * When you add content to talk pages, please be sure to sign your posts by adding four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. Gee thanks. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 14:56, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

here you go
 * When you add content to talk pages, please be sure to sign your posts by adding four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. - Sum mer PhD v2.0 15:12, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png or Signature icon.png) located above the edit window.

Thank you. Sum mer PhD v2.0 14:13, 25 September 2017 (UTC)

March 2018
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Mitch Mitchell, please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either: This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
 * 1) Add four tildes  ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment; or
 * 2) With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (Insert-signature.png in the enhanced toolbar, or Signature icon.png if you use the old "classic" toolbar) located above the edit window.

Thank you. —Ojorojo (talk) 20:08, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Mitch Mitchell. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —Ojorojo (talk) 20:08, 21 March 2018 (UTC)

I appreciate the advice, will surely sign everything now. It also really wasn't my intention to delete others' comments, I wouldn't have did that had I been more aware. Sorry about that, wasn't intentional.

So happy we finally got an official document for said articles date, stuff matters more than one thinks!Addeps3 (talk) 10:25, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

Willie Soon
The Heartland Institute has never been a reliable source. What makes you think it is? Here's an overview from UCS. Viriditas (talk) 00:55, 11 August 2021 (UTC)


 * While claiming to stand up for “sound science,” the Heartland Institute has routinely spread misinformation about climate science, including deliberate attacks on climate scientists.


 * Popular outcry forced the Heartland Institute to pull down a controversial billboard that compared supporters of global warming facts to Unabomber Ted Kaczynski, bringing an early end to a planned campaign first announced in an essay by Heartland President Joseph Bast, which claimed “… the most prominent advocates of global warming aren’t scientists. They are murderers, tyrants, and madmen.”


 * Heartland even once marked Earth Day by mailing out 100,000 free copies of a book claiming that “climate science has been corrupted” – despite acknowledging that “…all major scientific organizations of the world have taken the official position that humankind is causing global warming.”


 * Heartland received more than $675,000 from ExxonMobil from 1997-2006. Heartland also raked in millions from the Koch-funded organization Donors Trust through 2011.