User talk:Addie666

Your submission at Articles for creation: Amlan Chakrabarti (March 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.


 * Draft:Amlan Chakrabarti may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Addie666 Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:StraussInTheHouse&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Addie666 reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 SITH   (talk)   16:26, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

October 2020
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Kolkata, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use your sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.    Pro lix 💬 06:54, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

November 2020
Please do not move a page to a title that is harder to follow, or move it unilaterally against naming conventions or consensus. This includes making page moves while a discussion remains underway. We have some guidelines to help with deciding what title is best for a subject. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia.    Pro lix 💬 18:43, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Electronic voting by country, you may be blocked from editing.    Pro lix 💬 18:47, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Government of India, you may be blocked from editing.    Pro lix 💬 19:10, 10 November 2020 (UTC)

Regarding your signature
Hi, I just wanted to let you know that your current signature looks incredibly similar to mine. I request that you change it at the earliest since this goes against WP:SIGFORGE. Thanks  Pro lix 💬 18:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Your recent editing history at Secularism in India shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   11:36, 3 January 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Economy of India.    Pro lix 💬 18:13, 14 January 2021 (UTC)

How was my editing disruptive? Since I just included an image which I thought better showcased the Mumbai skyline. You could have simply said it's not better suited instead of terming it as 'disruptive'. Frankly, I'd rather not be on such a site which speaks of 'consensus' but basically bulldozes people with harsh words who might otherwise have good intentions.Addie666 (talk) 23:51, 14 January 2021 (UTC)Addie666