User talk:AddisonBlacksmith/sandbox

Making progress--RJBazell (talk) 16:24, 25 October 2018 (UTC)

Hi Helen...I think your article looks good. I like the sections you chose to include and the content you have under each heading. The Public Reaction section is perhaps a little light, but I wouldn't know how to add onto it. - Tucker Hansen 10/30/18

Peer Review from Lucky_Wilbury123
First, what does the article do well? Is there anything from your review that impressed you? Any turn of phrase that described the subject in a clear way? - I was impressed by the structure of your article. You hit all the important areas of the topic and it is ordered in a logical manner. What changes would you suggest the author apply to the article? Why would those changes be an improvement? - I think all of your content is great, but perhaps add more under the "Public Relation" section since you gave it its own heading Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article? Let them know - From reading your article, I realized I should also include a "History" section for my topic

Tuck — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lucky Wilbury123 (talk • contribs) 16:19, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Great article! I think you have really included all essential components and in a structure that makes sense. I would maybe consider developing the public reaction section, by giving a timeline maybe? The study has been going on for so long, it would be interesting to see how its publicity has changed or when it got more attention. I would also consider, maybe developing the section on limitations and controversy as well. You included a huge issue, which was diversity in the study, but why were men included in a women's study? Maybe one more example? Definitely a very interesting topic overall and well written! Alexandra — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peanutbutter345 (talk • contribs) 02:15, 2 November 2018 (UTC)