User talk:Addjuvare-001

Welcome!
Hello, Addjuvare-001, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Rummage4, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Nthep (talk) 10:17, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Rummage4


A tag has been placed on Rummage4, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nthep (talk) 10:17, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Please read WP:NOTADVERTISING and Notability. It would appear that you are associated with the company behind Rummage4 in which case you should also read Conflict of interest but at the moment the article relates to software that is in beta release and isn't the subject of independent review and comment from verifiable sources.  That might change in the futue but at the moment it is not a notable subject - in Wikipedia terms. Nthep (talk) 10:43, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Search Engine Interrogator (June 2)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Happysquirrel was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Search Engine Interrogator and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Search_Engine_Interrogator Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Happysquirrel&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Search_Engine_Interrogator reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Happy Squirrel (talk) 15:32, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Rummage4
Hi, thanks for message. After it was nominated by another editor, I deleted your article because
 * it did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. I can see no claim as to how your product meets the criteria, and it has no independent references as defined above anyway.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced claims presented as fact include: Rummage4 is all about making search simple for everyone... help you search for exactly what you want....
 * you are clearly editing on behalf of a company or organisation in violation of our terms and conditions. We at Rummage4... We would respectfully... We feel we deserve our efforts...; be aware that I block several companies daily (check my logs if you wish) for abusing this site for advertising.
 * jobs worth rules is rules approach to new projects... It seems very much you have one rule for established and influential firms, and another for small firms motivated to help others&mdash; please assume good faith. Not a reason for deletion, but it's difficult to see how accusing an admin of bias and being a "jobsworth" is likely to help your case.
 * We feel we deserve... &mdash; this is an encyclopaedia and entries have to meet our criteria, however worthy their aims

Your entry made no effort to follow our rules, and was spam blatantly written in the first person, so I see no reason to change my original decision. Jimfbleak - talk to me?  16:12, 2 June 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Search Engine Interrogator concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Search Engine Interrogator, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 4 December 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Search Engine Interrogator


Hello, Addjuvare-001. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Search Engine Interrogator".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Cahk (talk) 03:56, 14 December 2015 (UTC)