User talk:Addug

Re: Fall Out Boy
Yes, I actually saw it yesterday, lol. I was having trouble buying it but I finally got it. Amazing, in my opinion, but yea, it is very vague when compared to the video. I'll try to work on summarizing soon. - JWhitt (talk) 21:03, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll use those sites. Yes, mostly its just random IPs and people without accounts doing it. We had a small account of vandalism by an angry fan that wouldn't purchase the video on iTunes, and believed it was garbage that you had to buy it there. I'm pretty sure he was taken care of, however, as most vandalizers are. Other than, its better than my expectations so far. - JWhitt (talk) 22:36, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Re: Dude
Lol, thanks. I appreciate you telling me, also, lol. I was basically going for a Wikipedia page for myself, like to make in the style of one. The main summary is at the top, and the userboxes below describe seperate traits, interests, etc. I'm still nowhere close to being done with the userboxes, though. I just work on them as the time becomes open. Good luck with yours, and by the way, it already looks good as of now. :-) - JWhitt (talk) 21:05, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:ECA Logo.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:ECA Logo.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 11:58, 29 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Lab Records
A tag has been placed on Lab Records requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb1 (talk) 22:42, 30 April 2009 (UTC)

Talkback
On references. Immunize (talk) 13:40, 4 June 2010 (UTC)