User talk:Adeet1

Welcome
Welcome!

Hello, Adeet1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! cymru lass (hit me up)⁄(background check) 18:33, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Manual of Style

List of other black holes
Hello, I noticed you created the page List of other black holes, and I had a question about it. How are you determining which black holes to place in List of black holes and which black holes to place in List of other black holes? Right now, List of other black holes just seems to be an overflow list, and that might not be such a good idea. If you don't object, maybe I could turn List of other black holes into a list of black hole candidates and move any known black holes into List of black holes. If I don't hear from you within a few days, I'll just go ahead and do it. You can reply here or on my talk page. --- cymru lass (hit me up)⁄(background check) 18:39, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

Black hole page named "List of other black holes"
Well, I know you're saying that List of other black holes is an overflow list, but the reason why I created "List of other black holes" is because I do not want to clog up "List of black holes". I am getting the names of the black holes from another website, and I am entering them into List of other black holes instead of List of black holes. So, that's like saying that the black holes that are listed in the Wikipedia page are from Wikipedia, and if I put the black hole names that I found from the other website, then it would be mixed up. I have gotten the names of the black holes from http://www.johnstonsarchive.net/relativity/bhctable.html. Just to make it more organized, I have created a seperate page of black holes.

Adeet1 (talk) 19:47, 12 September 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, the black holes on List of black holes are not actually from Wikipedia. They come from various sources. It doesn't make sense to categorize the second list as "other" black holes, because it's essentially having two pages about the same subject. Are all the black holes on that website black hole candidates, or is it a mix of candidates and known black holes? If it's just black hole candidates, then a proper name for the list is List of black hole candidates. You don't seem to be autoconfirmed on Wikipedia (click the link for more info), so you wouldn't be able to move a page, but I can do the move for you. Oh, and to reply to a post on a talk page, just indent your reply by placing a certain number of colons before the first line of your reply. For example, to reply to this post, I put one colon in front of my reply. To reply to my reply you would put two colons in front of your reply.  --- cymru lass (hit me up)⁄(background check) 00:53, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010
Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages can confuse readers, and are overall not helpful to the Wikipedia project; furthermore, blanking a page is not the same as deleting it.

If the article you blanked is a duplicate of another article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalized, please revert it to the last legitimate revision. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please use the appropriate deletion process. WookieInHeat (talk) 01:02, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of other black holes. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. AutoGeek (talk) 01:03, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary&#32;for your edits. Doing so helps everyone to understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. 5 albert square (talk) 01:08, 25 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Can I ask why you keep erasing content from List of other black holes? You're not explaining why in your edit summaries so I don't understand your edits. --5 albert square (talk) 01:14, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to List of other black holes. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. WookieInHeat (talk) 01:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Page titles
It appears that you recently revised both List of black hole candidates and List of other black holes so that each of them redirects to the other. This is not helpful. If you have a problem with page content or titles, please try to resolve it by discussion with other users. If this was an error, please check your work more carefully in the future. Thank you. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 09:20, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of all NGC objects


The article List of all NGC objects has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Listcruft.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tckma (talk) 19:48, 26 October 2010 (UTC)