User talk:Adegaeta

Kent State Phone Center
A tag has been placed on your article Kent State Phone Center, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be a biographical account about a person, group of people, or band, but it does not indicate how or why he/she/they is/are notable. If you can indicate why Kent State Phone Center is really notable, I advise you to edit the article promptly, and also put a note on Talk:Kent State Phone Center. Any admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. You might also want to read our general biography criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that admins should wait a while for you to assert his/her/their notability, please affix the template  to the page, and then immediately add such an assertion. It is also a very good idea to add citations from reliable sources to ensure that your article will be verifiable. AmiDaniel (Talk) 06:41, 21 March 2006 (UTC)
 * Saying that it is notable at the school does not make it notable for an encylopedia. If this is really notable at that school, then it should be included in the school article.  Remember that the information also needs to be verifiable.  Vegaswikian 06:49, 21 March 2006 (UTC)


 * and how is your user page "notable for an encyclopedia?"


 * Please don't take offense at this, it's just policy. The topic probably is important, and I encourage you to integrate it into the Kent State article. We just simply can't have a page for every room of every university, partially because it's frustrating for users to have to search around for tiny stub articles about topics that should be covered entirely in the main article. For larger and more notable sub-topics, however, individual articles may be appropriate. See Deletion. (Userspace, btw, isn't subject to the same policies as Mainspace.) Please don't let this discourage you from editing, and I apologize for the inconvenience. AmiDaniel (Talk) 07:04, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Welcome
In light of this dispute, the following info might be helpful:

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

I really wish this would be automatically posted on all new user's talk pages, but as of yet that isn't done--which often leads to these kinds of disagreements. Please ask me if you have any questions. AmiDaniel (Talk) 07:07, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Prod
I've added the "prod" template to the article The Federalist Revolutionary, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:The Federalist Revolutionary. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Batmanand | Talk 19:51, 8 April 2006 (UTC)