User talk:Adeimantas

May 2020
Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – Sabbatino (talk) 07:41, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Please stop adding unsourced content. Please read WP:V to get a better understanding about how things work here. In addition, you should also read WP:RS, WP:OR and WP:NPOV. – Sabbatino (talk) 10:51, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Please keep the discussion here and not on my talk page. I am not supposed to translate anything to you. Gediminas was never crowned as King and how he referred to himself does not make him a King. In addition, you are once again adding unsourced content. It is your duty to source the claims you are adding. – Sabbatino (talk) 07:44, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

I hope you read Latin and German o perhaps Lithuanian...I would recomend you to check out how Pope John XXII address Gediminas in his leters and how German sources title Gediminas and his ancestors, his kingdom, people of his kingdom etc..It is you duty also to check it out ....

June 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, you may be blocked from editing. – Sabbatino (talk) 12:30, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

Was my editing wrong in any way? From time of Mindaugas until time of Vytautas Lituania was Kingdom and ruled by Kings, there are plenty of historical documents to proof those titles ....I tried to.. just read it ...be more eager to know or learn something instead of repeating wrong historical tradition intentionally created over the centuries o perhps just turn on tv and stick with sports ...
 * The Kingdom of Lithuania existed under Mindaugas only. Every subsequent Grand Dukes that referred to themselves as "King" were not kings since they were not crowned as such. In addition, it is you who should learn the history of the Lithuanian state. And it is you who should perhaps stick to sports, but I doubt that you are even capable of that. The fact that all your contributions were also reverted in the Lithuanian Wikipedia just shows that you clearly do not understand how things work here and that you are WP:NOTHERE. – Sabbatino (talk) 13:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Description of Gediminas seal: "Sigillum vero huiusmodi litteris appensum erat rotundum cereum, continens circulum duodecim angulorum et in medio circuli ymaginem viri capillati residentis in cathedra continentis in manu dextra coronam et ceptrum in sinistra; et in circumferentia eius per quadraginta unam litteras e t cruce sculptum erat: S DEI GRACIA GEDEMINNI LETHWINOR ET RUTKENOR REG." (from S. C. ROWELL Chartularium Lithuaniae res gestas magni ducis Gedeminne illustrans, Vilnius 2003) ( link to 83 14th century documents mostly writen outside Lithuania with many "interestig" titles) https://www.epaveldas.lt/recordText/LNB/C1B0002960629/Gedimino_laiskai.html?exId=315462&seqNr=4#toc_marker-7-97

Free education :regis Lethowie; regni regis Litaonie; regem Lytwinorum; rex paganus Lytaonie; Illustri principi domino Gedemynde Dei gratia Lethwinorum Ruthenorumque regi; regem Lithuaniae Godemunde; Dei gratia Lethwinorum Ruthenorumque regi; item predecessor noster rex Viten; Pucuwerus rex Lethowie; Vichenus Rex Lethoviae; terram regis Butegeyde; Gedeminne Dei gratia Letphanorum Ruthenorumque Rex, princeps et Dux Semigallie; in civitate nostra regia, dicta Vilna; civitate nostra regia Vilna; sub speciali forma et sigillo regio regis Letphanorum presentaverunt; S DEI GRACIA GEDEMINNI Lethwinor et Rutkenor Reg; rex Litwinorum; illustris domini Regis Letwinorum; Ghodeminne de koningh van Lettowen; Gedeminne Letwi norum et multorum Ruthenorum rex; et Olgherdem, Keystutten, fratres reges Lethovie; kunge der Littouwin; koning Gedeminne van Lettowen; Gedeminne de koninge van Lethowen;

there is more: http://www.epaveldas.lt/recordText/LNB/C1B0002960629/Gedimino_laiskai.html?exId=315462&seqNr=4