User talk:Adelmang

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Surflight.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Surflight.gif. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created [ in your upload log]. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 13:52, 16 May 2011 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:52, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

License tagging for File:Surflight Theatre.gif
Thanks for uploading File:Surflight Theatre.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 16:07, 16 May 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:RoyMiller.jpg


A tag has been placed on File:RoyMiller.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eeekster (talk) 02:42, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:RoyMiller.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:RoyMiller.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Eeekster (talk) 23:54, 2 July 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Showplace Ice Cream Parlour


A tag has been placed on Showplace Ice Cream Parlour requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 03:00, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Removing Speedy at Showplace Ice Cream Parlour
- SDPatrolBot (talk) 03:18, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Showplace Ice Cream Parlour. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 03:23, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with this edit to Showplace Ice Cream Parlour. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   03:27, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello Adelmang. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
 * 1) editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
 * 2) participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
 * 3) linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   03:35, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Roy Miller (producer)


A tag has been placed on Roy Miller (producer), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mr. Vernon (talk) 03:39, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest policy and notability guidelines. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 04:01, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

I am prepared to agree some good faith on this. The Surflight Theatre article was appalling spam before you ever made an edit to it, so you certainly didn't make the situation any worse. And it had been in existence for some years, so a naive editor might reasonably think it was an OK pattern for other articles. It wasn't, unfortunately. I can't put the article back up, because it was truly awful and would need a complete rewrite to meet Wikipedia policies. You can have a go at writing a better one - click this link and start typing User:Adelmang/Sandbox. Make sure you include references to significant coverage in secondary sources about the theatre itself - not just reviews of the productions - to prove that the theatre is notable under Wikipedia rules - read WP:GNG for more information. St. George's Hall, London is a good little article about a notable theatre. Elen of the Roads (talk) 23:30, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! I had also added pages for a well-known singing ice cream parlour that is next door to the theatre and a successful Broadway producer who is donating his services and trying to bring the theatre out of bankruptcy. I thought these were noteworthy topics, but I realize now they might have not been set up appropriately. But all three pages were deleted unilaterally when I was blocked. Are they ok to reattempt in the sandbox? The producer is on IMDB and other places. Also, does it matter that the sandbox address you provided above is not the same as my username?Adelmang (talk) 00:38, 31 October 2011 (UTC)
 * First, I fixed my bad spelling above :) Second, read up on our policy on reliable sources WP:RS. IMDB is always considered a bit of a dubious source, because some of the content is generated by fans.  What you need for the ice cream place is some reviews of it in good sources - not just your local paper. If the producer doesn't have an article and is famous, you can certainly write one, but look at the artices for other producers to see how to structure it.  Keep thinking "encyclopaedia article" - so a bit formal, bit on the dry side, no 'talking to camera' etc.  If you need more sandboxes, you can make your own et User:Adelmang/Sandbox Two etc. Just create the redlink, and click on it. Elen of the Roads (talk) 00:59, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

Talkback
Mr. Vernon (talk) 03:18, 15 November 2011 (UTC)