User talk:Adem/Archive 1

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited 1999 İzmit earthquake, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Kocaeli, Sakarya and Gölcük (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - June 2012
Note: the Newsletter is "collapsed" for convenience. To see the full letter, click on the "show" button at the right end of the blue bar.

This Newsletter was delivered by Wesley ☀ Mouse 13:09, 2 June 2012 (UTC). If you are no longer interested in WikiProject Eurovision then please remove your name from this list.

Project Eurovision RFC discussion reminder
WikiProject Eurovision: This is a reminder to all members of Project Eurovision, that there is still an ongoing RfC discussion taking place at the project talk page. It is vital that everyone participates in this discussion, as it concerns the future manual of style and article layout in regards to Eurovision Song Contest by Year and Junior Eurovision Song Contest by Year articles. This is your ideal opportunity to contribute suggestions and ideas on a major issue, which will reflect on the way these articles will be written in future. Thank You! EdwardsBot (talk) 14:11, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Naming
Hi. Seems like I have found a fellow citizen of mine :) Regarding your edits in the article of Northern Cyprus, I want to note something. Contributing to English Wikipedia means adopting to the place and using names which are well-established or considered by third-party users as neutral or on which we have a consensus. These are the cases in invasion, Apostolos Andreas and so forth. Even if one personally disagrees, they have to use that name. Insisting on changing them would be considered disruptive. So I would advise you to edit in this context. --Seksen (talk) 15:49, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

KKTC
Selamlar. Daha önce de belirttiğim gibi özellikle İngilizce Vikipedi'ye katkıda bulunmak için belirli şeyleri kabullenmek gerekiyor. Elbette ki kişisel olarak kabul ettiğimiz doğrular olduğumuz için, olayın taraflarından birine mensup olduğumuz için alışmak kolay değil. İtiraf etmeliyim ki benim için de kolay olmadı. Bu bağlamda Vikipedi'de bir şeyleri bu gereklilikten dolayı kabullenmek ile kişisel olarak kabullenmek arasında fark olduğunu belirtmek isterim. Kişisel olarak 74 harekatına "işgal" demezsiniz, ben de demem; ama buradayken kabullenmek zorundayım denilmesini. Nedenlerini bu uzuunca yazıda açıklayacağım :)

Vikipedi'de tarafsız bakış açısı dediğimiz bir kural var. Maddeleri buna uygun yazmak zorundayız. Bunu aşağıda açıklayacağım. Ayrıca madde adlarında ve içlerinde İngilizcedeki yaygın kullanımlar kullanılıyor. Zafer Burnu örneğinde İngilizcede yaygın olarak "Cape Apostolos Andreas" kullanıyor (Google Books aramaları bir fikir verebilir). Bu nedenle bu kullanılmak zorunda. Bu değiştirilebilecek bir durum değil. Bunu kabul etmemek bir şey getirmeyecektir.

Adlara fazla takılınmaması gerektiğini düşünüyorum ben. Kullanıcılara da. Karşımızdaki ister Rum olsun, ister üçüncü ülkeden biri, sunduğu argümanlara odaklanılmalı. Aksi halde üretken bir ortam oluşmaz, sonuç getirmeyen, kısır tartışmalara sürüklenilir. Eğer katılmadığımız bir fikirleri varsa bunu "sen Rumsun, onun için böyle yapıyorsun!" şeklinde değil, onun bakış açısını anlamaya çalışıp, olayın bir diğer tarafı daha olduğunu ve bu tarafın da görüşlerinin böyle olduğunu kabul edip ve bu görüşlere saygı gösterip, bunun ardından katılmadığımız noktaları kibarca dile getirerek ifade etmeliyiz. Değişikliğiniz geri alınırsa çok çok sebebini açıklayarak (ünlemlerden mümkün olduğunca kaçının) bir veya iki defa geri alın (dördüncüde değişiklik yapmanız engellenebilir), daha sonra tartışma sayfasına taşıyın. Vikipedi'de kişiler üzerine yorum yapmak hoş karşılanmaz. Bir önceki paragrafta tarafsız bakış açısından bahsetmiştim. Tabii sahip olduğunuz bakış açısına göre bunun yorumlanışı değişiyor. Yunanlı bir kullanıcı KKTC'deki bir yeri anlatırken uluslararası toplum tarafından işgal altında kabul edildiğine vurgu yapmak isteyebilir; ama Türk bir kullanıcı bu vurguya gerek olmadığını söyleyecektir. Bu durumlarda işte az önce söylediklerim çok önemli. Her iki tarafın da argümanlarının sunulduğu tartışmalarda genelde üçüncü parti kullanıcılar iki tarafın görüşlerini değerlendirerek tarafsız, tercihen herkes için kabul edilebilir bir çözüm bulmaya çalışıyor. "İşgal" olayında üçüncü parti kullanıcılar da tarafsız kullanıcılar bunun doğru kullanım olduğunu düşünüyor, bu daha önce tartışıldığı için defa defa gündeme getirilmesi hoş karşılanmıyor. Eğer üçüncü parti kullanıcılar yoksa kullanıcılar arasında (geçici de olsa) bir anlaşmaya varılarak (ki bu anlaşmaya varılamazsa genelde tartışmalı değişiklikten önceki sürüm oluyor, standart uygulama böyle) sorun çözülüyor.

Uzun lafın kısası, burada esas olan Vikipedi'nin savaş alanı olmadığını unutmamak, olayların diğer bakış açılarına saygı gösterip kibarca tartışabilmek ve yeri geldiğinde kişisel görüşlerimize uygun düşmese de bazı şeyleri kabul edebilmek. Bunlar unutulmadığında verim doğuyor, kazanan maddeler oluyor, kazanan Vikipedi oluyor.

Yardımcı olabildiysem ne mutlu bana. İleride de danışmaktan çekinmeyin lütfen. Eyi çalışmalar :)

--Seksen (talk) 19:47, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

The message above in English:

Hi. As I have said before, one need to accept things especially in order to be able to contribute to English Wikipedia. Of course as we all have our own truths, and as we belong to one of the sides of the dispute, it is not easy to adapt. To be honest, it was not easy for me either. In this context, I want to note that accepting something on Wikipedia and accepting something personally are different things. Personally, you might not call the operation in 1974 an "invasion", neither I do, but here you must accept it to be called an "invasion". I am going to explain why in this long, long message :)

There is a rule we call the neutral point of view in Wikipedia. We need to write articles in accordance to this. I will explain it further below. Furthermore, common names are used in article names or inside articles. In the case of Cape Victory, the common English usage is "Cape Apostolos Andreas" (Google Books search results might provide you with an idea). This means that this name has to be used. This is not something that can be changed. Not accepting this would not produce anything.

I think that one must not stick to names in Wikipedia. And neither to users. We can be talking to a Greek or a person from another country and descent, we need to focus on their arguments. If this is not done, a productive environment is not formed and this results in unproductive discussions. If they have an idea you disagree with, don't say, "oh, you are a Greek, that's why you are doing this!". Instead of this, try to understand his/her viewpoint, accept that there is another side to that discussion and that side thinks like that, and respect those views, and then express the points you do not agree with in a polite manner. If your edit is reverted, you may bring it back one of two times adequately explaining it reason (preferably without explanation marks), and then start a discussion in the talk page. Commenting on users is discouraged in Wikipedia. I have mentioned the neutral point of view in the previous paragraph. Of course, the way you perceive this depends on your viewpoint. A Greek user may like to stress the fact that it is considered to be occupied by the international community in an article about, say, a place in the TRNC, whereas a Turkish user would say that this emphasis is unnecessary. In these cases, what I have said is very important. In discussion where arguments of both sides are presented, third-party users are often involved in finding a neutral solution which would preferably satisfy everyone. In the case of "invasion", third-party users think that this is the correct use and as this issue has been discussed before, new attempts to discuss this naming are often not welcomed.

So, in short, what it important is not to forget that Wikipedia is not a battleground, to respect other points of view, to discuss in a polite manner and to be able to accept things even if we do not accept them in person. If these are remembered, the result is often productivity, and it is the articles and Wikipedia that wins.

I am glad if I have been helpful. Do not hesitate to ask should you have any questions. Have a nice night :)

--Seksen (talk) 19:47, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Piri Reis Map
See Talk:History of the Falkland Islands, please note I disagree with the comments there. Wee Curry Monster talk 14:35, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - July 2012
'''This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 18:24, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Jac 16888 Talk 16:40, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - August 2012
'''This newsletter was delivered on 19:42, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision: Recent changes
Hello,

Please note that there have been some changes to operations surrounding Eurovision articles, these being that:


 * Template names have now been modernised and/or megred into super-templates, for example Countries in the Eurovision Song Contest has now been merged into Template:Eurovision Song Contest making it even easier to find everything under one template. If you are planning to create a new template, please keep the standardised titles in mind.  Other templates have been modernised and a full list of them can be found here.
 * The Eurovision Song Contest and Junior Eurovision Song Contest articles have now been standardised to keep a consitancy throughout the project and to the genral reader too. Skeleton article drafts can be found for Eurovision Song Contest by Year and Junior Eurovision Song Contest by Year.

If you have any questions, please ask at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Eurovision.

You are receiving this message since you are listed as a member of WikiProject Eurovision. If you are no longer interested in contributing to Eurovision articles, please remove your username from this page.

Delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:35, 12 August 2012 (UTC) on behalf of Project Eurovision

WP:Eurovision Newsletter (September 2012)
'''This newsletter was delivered by

Project Memorandum
This mini memorandum has been delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 13:51, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Turkey's Location Issue
Hello, I ask you to please set politics and culture aside and please look at a map. You will see that Turkey has more land mass in Asia rather than in Europe. Although Turkey is a candidate of the European Union; Turkey is also a member of numerous Asian regional bodies. You are correct to state that Armenia is stated in some articles as being Europe. Armenia is located in Asia, including Cyprus even though it is a member of the European Union. Please take to mind that just because a country joins a regional body, does not mean that its geography has changed. Germany, for example is a member of the Mediterranean Union. Germany obviously does not border the Mediterranean. Spain has territory in Africa. Spain is not in Africa. Egypt has the Sinai peninsula in Asia. However, people do not regard Egypt as an Asian country. There are many examples to give, however the facts are simple to see.

The references you gave were two. However, you seemed to overlook the part where it says "South eastern Europe and south western Asia." The CIA website states the same as well as the Turkish government sponsored website of goTurkey. This website states that the Marmara region is only 8% of Turkey. Istanbul is in this region and that is what makes Turkey only partially within the European continent. Why overlook the other 92% of the country which is within Asia?

I have been an editing member in Wikipeida for five years, and you are not the first to bring up the question of whether or not Turkey is part of Asia or Europe. The general consensus has been that Turkey is within Asia, that is why almost all of the articles (minus the ones you just changed) place Turkey in Asia. Please refer to the numerous talk pages. Aquintero (talk) 18:29, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Courtesy notice
Hello. There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Please see Runaway edit-warring by Maurice07. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 02:22, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - October 2012
This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 23:34, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - November 2012
This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 10:42, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Istanbul
Hi there; napan? Please indicate your choice of pics at the discussion page of Istanbul article. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 23:16, 8 November 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - December 2012
This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 22:13, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Taiwan
Hello Maurice. Are you interested to share your two cents at Talk:Taiwan? (Interestingly, contributors in both Talk:Taiwan and Talk:Cyprus made use of arguments such as "insignificant", "people won't understand", and "people who aren't familiar will be confused".) 14.0.208.68 (talk) 23:31, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

December 2012
Your recent editing history at Turkey shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 22:49, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Turkey, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 22:49, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Template:Countries and territories of the Mediterranean Sea shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. I told you before but I am telling you again: Please read the message on top of the template: PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS TEMPLATE IS ONLY MEANT TO INCLUDE THOSE COUNTRIES AND TERRITORIES RECOGNISED BY A MAJORITY OF UNITED NATIONS MEMBERS). Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 02:46, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - January 2013
This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 15:55, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Courtesy notice for WP:3RRN
It is here. Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 00:43, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

January 2013
Your recent editing history at Languages of Europe shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. λόγος<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">πράξις 14:06, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Xanthi shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. <sup style="position:relative">λόγος<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">πράξις 14:07, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Restoring a 3RR complaint which still needs a closure
Hello Maurice07. I recently restored Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. This report had been archived by the bot with no formal closure.

It looks to me that you have engaged in long-term edit warring at List of diplomatic missions of the United Kingdom. You had already been blocked last September for a previous episode of the same war, per: Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive770. Whether Turkey is in Europe or not is a familiar issue for admins who watch these articles, and it is not a surprise to see people reverting this back and forth. You are expected to seek consensus for your views in a dispute like that. Can you point to any discussion where your position is supported?

You may be able to avoid sanctions for long-term edit warring if you will agree to wait for consensus before making any further edits which assume that Turkey is in Europe. If you accept this offer, please respond at the noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 18:25, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Languages of Europe shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. <sup style="position:relative">λόγος<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">πράξις 01:31, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Languages of Europe shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. <sup style="position:relative">λόγος<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">πράξις 01:38, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Courtesy notice for WP:AE
The report is filed at Maurice07. Δρ.Κ. <sup style="position:relative">λόγος<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">πράξις 04:05, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
— <span style="color: #194D00; font-family: Palatino, Times, serif">Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 10:08, 13 January 2013 (UTC)

Topic ban for Greek-Turkish relations
Following [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=532914431 a thread] at Arbitration Enforcement, you are topic banned from editing in the Greek-Turkish relations area, broadly interpreted. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  20:45, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * I have replied at my talkpage. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  01:04, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 15
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mediterranean Sea, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Split and Hatay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Warning
-- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  02:10, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

AE block
To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  15:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC)  Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee." This is to enforce the ArbCom ruling on Macedonia, and to address your continuing edit warring issue. -- DQ   (ʞlɐʇ)  15:16, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Emmette Hernandez Coleman (talk) 23:10, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ahmet Davutoğlu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page NATO headquarters (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 02:18, 27 January 2013 (UTC)  Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - February 2013
This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 12:38, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

Karanlık ve kasvetli İstanbul
Tam da "Midnight Express" filmi ile yaratılmak istenen klişeleşmiş imajı desteklemişsin. Sarai Sierra cinayeti ile de uyumlu bir atmosfer olmuş. "Karanlık, ışıksız, korkutucu, kaotik, kasvetli, itici, yobaz bir şehir" imajı. 88.251.90.139 (talk) 14:58, 13 February 2013 (UTC)
 * Öncelikle sizin görüşünüze saygı duyuyorum fakat başka kullanıcıların düşüncelerine de saygı duymalısınız! "Midnight Express" filmini izledim bunun silüet fotoğrafı ile uzaktan yakından hiçbir alâkası bulunmuyor. Silüet fotoğrafları adı üstünde güneşin batışı veya doğuşu esnasında çekilen fotoğraflardır. Doğal olarak ön planda kalan eserin ve ya binanın karanlıkta kalması son derece doğal olduğunu düşünüyorum. Sarai Siera cinayetinin bu süreç ile ilgisini kavrayamadım. Ayrıca bunun abartıldığı kanısındayım. Maurice (talk) 16:35, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

WP:ANI
Your disruptive edits to is discussed at WP:ANI .Jeppiz (talk) 21:50, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

February 2013
To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been temporarily blocked from editing. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 20:48, 26 February 2013 (UTC)  Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting all administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.


 * For God's sake!
 * Now,why I'm blocked by User:The Blade of the Northern Lights?There is no any explanation??? I can't really make any sense. Your talk page unavailable. I wonder,what's my fault? This is really unacceptable !!! Maurice (talk) 21:50, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

First off, as this is an AE block, this will have to be procedurally declined; the process for appealing AE sanctions is laid out in the unblock request and at the top of WP:AE. Secondly, for any reviewing admins, see User talk:The Blade of the Northern Lights for context; I'm finding it very hard to believe the IP and Maurice07 are separate people. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 19:42, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Turkey ranks "High" in the HDI Index, not "Medium"
Check out the article list of countries by Human Development Index and then please correct your mistake in the infobox of the Turkey article. 88.251.85.34 (talk) 22:03, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - March 2013
This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 04:11, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

March 2013
To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for 2 weeks. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 17:52, 27 March 2013 (UTC)  Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.

April 2013
I've blocked you for one week for edit warring at World Tourism rankings. I find it staggering that you're still repeating the same mistakes you made six months ago. Let me make this clear - no matter how much you disagree with someone, edit warring is unacceptable in any case. The only case in which you may revert users like that is when someone is blatantly, maliciously vandalizing the project. Otherwise, don't do it.

I've blocked you for one week. However, please note that you are at the end of your rope; if this happens again, there will be serious repercussions.

You are welcome to ask any questions here if you feel I haven't explained something adequately. Regards, <font color="#0">m.o.p 14:16, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - April 2013
This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 16:04, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Hijab by country shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. <sup style="position:relative">λόγος<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">πράξις  22:14, 23 April 2013 (UTC)


 * Not only that but reverting without an edit-summary is totally unacceptable. Were you hoping no one would notice? Athenean (talk) 02:53, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

List of diplomatic missions in Turkey
Hello, these were the only proof I could find: Regards, Aquintero, (talk), 12:14, 24 April 2013 (UTC)
 * Gine’de Türk elçiliği açıldı
 * Diplomatie : la Turquie s’apprête à ouvrir son Ambassade en Guinée


 * Yes, it would seem that Guinea does have an embassy in Turkey based on the links you provided and this link below:
 * Foreign minister of Guinea visits Turkey
 * Also, Rwanda will also be opening an embassy in Turkey soon:
 * Rwanda to open embassy in Turkey
 * Regards, Aquintero, (talk), 19:18, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Armenia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Δρ.Κ. <sup style="position:relative">λόγος<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">πράξις  10:54, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Armenia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Δρ.Κ. <sup style="position:relative">λόγος<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">πράξις  21:44, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been temporarily blocked from editing. You are welcome to make useful contributions once the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and then appeal your block using the instructions there. The Blade of the Northern Lights ( 話して下さい ) 16:33, 30 April 2013 (UTC)  Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.

Reported
You have been reported under AA2 for your disruption in Armenian related articles. Proudbolsahye (talk) 18:31, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
Δρ.Κ. <sup style="position:relative">λόγος<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">πράξις  23:58, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - May 2013
This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:19, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - June 2013
This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 12:20, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=560366196 your edit] to Economy of Vietnam may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:19, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * economy

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=560368157 your edit] to Economy of Sweden may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:40, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Infobox economy

What's JDLI?
You provided a link, but it doesn't lead anywhere.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 09:14, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh, found it. No, my liking has nothing to do with the edit. Such detailed information don't belong to a country-level article, especially not in image captions.--eh bien mon prince (talk) 09:39, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision - Memorandum
This memo was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 17:44, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Reported
You have been reported here. Proudbolsahye (talk) 18:40, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Eurovision Newsletter - July 2013
This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 18:57, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Removing the picture of a Greek Orthodox Church
Please do not violate your sanctions again:. Thank you. Δρ.Κ. <sup style="position:relative">λόγος<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">πράξις  02:23, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Checking further, this is the second time you removed the Church picture using also a misleading edit-summary:. Let me remind you: You are banned from Greek-Turkish relations broadly construed. Next stop will be Arbitration Enforcement. Δρ.Κ. <sup style="position:relative">λόγος<span style="position:relative;bottom:-2.0ex;left:-5.2ex;*left:-5.5ex">πράξις  02:33, 16 July 2013 (UTC)