User talk:Adem/Archive 3

Disambiguation link notification for March 6
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited H&M, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sakarya. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Erdoğan and AKP
When did Erdoğan leave AKP? Alakzi (talk) 11:10, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes Alakzi, his membership officially ended by Constitution of Turkey. See: Maurice Flesier (talk) 11:16, 6 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, the constitution does say that, but he question is, did he? Can you find a source that says as much? Alakzi (talk) 14:39, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

Turkey Name and Motto
Hello there Maurice,

I respect you as a major Wikipedia editor, you obviously know a lot about the subject of Turkey. I thank you for your edit but I am completely sure that the official name of Turkey, under the constitution of the the nation, is the "State of Turkey" And the motto is also official, under The 1982 amended constitution. I fully respect your edit to the article for Turkey but please, revert your changes as the information was correct.

Please Maurice, do not take this in a hostile way, I respect your edits but it is incorrect, my deepest apologies for this.

Kindest Regards Marmiras — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marmiras (talk • contribs) 14:32, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

about the barsntar
Thanks mate, i wasnt expecting that. That thing made my day :D   kazekagetr  07:45, 16 April 2015 (UTC)

Istanbul World Heritage Sites
Hallo Maurice, I started a thread on Talk:Istanbul. Bye Alex2006 (talk) 11:19, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Inclusion of Turkish in non-Turkish settlements
Why do you insist on adding Turkish names for non-Turkish settlements in Kosovo? This is redundant (and unconstructive).--Z oupan 15:57, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Non-Turkish settlements cannot be considered as a reason. As I said on the summary, Turkish language officially recognized regional language for Municipalities of Kosovo like Albanian and Serbian!! Maurice Flesier (talk) 16:06, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Bosniak, Romani are as well. Common sense: Turks constitute less than 0.1%—no need for Turkish. I will report you since you insist on reverting.--Z oupan 16:13, 28 April 2015 (UTC)

See Conflict_of_interest/Noticeboard.--Z oupan 16:25, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Wrong forum; I started a new thread, Neutral_point_of_view/Noticeboard.--Z oupan 15:39, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. --Z oupan 17:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * [[Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg|30px|alt=Stop icon]] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Gračanica, Kosovo. --Z oupan 17:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Ambox warning pn.svg Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Gračanica, Kosovo. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

So, if there is an ongoing discussion, the stable version stays.--Z oupan 17:56, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

Sorry
I was just reverting myself, having noticed too late that the column was headed "UNWTO region", but I'd taken too long checking it on the UNWTO site. Sorry for putting you to the trouble of reverting me. It does make me wonder whether that column is very helpful - but I'll not get involved in that now! NebY (talk) 11:20, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * There is no reason to apologize, NebY. Technically, you're right. Antalya geographically is located in Asia. But the UN World Tourism Organisation shows to Turkey in Europe just like İsrael. I think that this column be removeD for Euromonitor and MasterCard reports. Ultimately, the WTO regions has nothing to do with them. Thus, the disputes that may arise in the future can be avoided. Maurice Flesier (talk) 12:13, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you! I agree; I suppose I could check the history to see if this has been a matter of discussion or dispute before but otherwise we could just go ahead. I'm even wondering whether using UNWTO regions in any of the tables helps at all, or whether readers would find the customary geographic continents more useful. NebY (talk) 17:46, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  Ąnαșταη  ( ταlκ )  19:39, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello Maurice Flesier. I have noticed there is an entry for you (as Maurice07) in WP:RESTRICT, which recommends an indefinite block if disputes involving you spread to new areas. If you have any comments on what admins should do here, you could reply to the complaint about you at WP:AN3. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 00:04, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring at Gračanica, Kosovo
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Long-term edit warring. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. The full report is at at this AN3 case (permanent link). See WP:GAB if you wish to appeal. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:45, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Appeal?? Which case is taken to appeal without any defense? Yes, each user does not make edit to Wikipedia for 24 hours. If this is a part of Archive128, Gračanica would be a town in Greece? I violated 3RR but not AE banned topics. Is Hagia Sophia part of Greek-Turkish relations? User:Anastan is sockpuppet of User:Zoupan. To understand this, you do not need to be a scientist! I put a template associated with it, but it was removed by sockpuppet. Zoupan activates the Anastan to avoid infringement. Same Serbian related articles, same moves..


 * Frankly, I do not believe that it is no longer neutral in Wikipedia, admin User:EdJohnston. Certain articles, has turned the property of specific users. This situation is being covered up by administrators. Armenian and Greek users running the lobbying and it took place in The Guardian. Already this is surely known. Unblock request will not change anything, as in the previous. No Justice, no neutral admins, no objective articles and a user without puppets.. Thank u Maurice Flesier (talk) 21:35, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I want to note that Maurice Flesier accused Anastan to be my sockpuppet.--Z oupan 22:59, 5 May 2015 (UTC)

request a new photo
Hi, it's a pleasure to me to speak with you, Can you, please, make a new photo with the List of presidential trips made by Moncef Marzouki like the File:Abdullah Gül foreign trips.png. Or, can you tell me to an other user who can make this new photo. Thank you very much.--Mohatatou (talk) 20:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

The 1000 Challenge (Turkey)
Hi. I was wondering if you'd be interested in setting up The 1000 Challenge (Turkey), based on The 10,000 Challenge and The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). Now it's not a contest in itself, it's designed to motivate people to inspire others to improve content and build something which demonstrates the hard work going into the country which is visible. The focus is more on quality improvements but new articles are welcome too. Eventually a Turkish National Contest could be created to fuel it, like Awaken the Dragon, in which contestants can choose to keep the Amazon vouchers themselves to buy their own books for more articles or put them into book fund to help editors further improve Turkish-related topics by giving them the books they want. It will begin though as purely an improvement drive. If interested, or you think anybody else might be interested, alert them and sign up on the Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Turkey talk page at the bottom. Thank you. --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:12, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Asian 10,000 Challenge invite
Hi. The WikiProject Asia/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland The 10,000 Challenge and WikiProject Africa/The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like South East Asia, Japan/China or India etc, much like The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. At some stage we hope to run some contests to benefit Asian content, a destubathon perhaps, aimed at reducing the stub count would be a good place to start, based on the current WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon which has produced near 200 articles in just three days. If you would like to see this happening for Asia, and see potential in this attracting more interest and editors for the country/countries you work on please sign up and being contributing to the challenge! This is a way we can target every country of Asia, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant! Thank you. -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 05:22, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Category:Order of the State of Republic of Turkey has been nominated for discussion
Category:Order of the State of Republic of Turkey, which you created, has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. RevelationDirect (talk) 02:34, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Winter Sleep (Poster).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Winter Sleep (Poster).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:09, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

How to be unblocked
Hello Maurice. You have been indefinitely blocked since 2015. You sent me a request for unblock by email. Since your talk page is open to you, you should post your unblock rationale here and someone will respond. If possible you should use the unblock template. See WP:GAB for the steps. At the time of your block you were under some topic bans imposed at WP:AE. If admins decide to lift your block, you would still remain under those topic bans until they also were successfully appealed. A checkuser would also look at technical information to be sure you have not been socking recently. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 13:42, 3 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Hello Maurice. You indicate you may have made some contributions using IPs during the period that your account was blocked. Can you identify the IPs you used? EdJohnston (talk) 16:28, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Sure, i would you like to share what i can remember.

These are the ones that come to mind. There may be more different IP addresses, but as I said before, they do not violate Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Maurice Flesier (talk) 23:21, 3 November 2021 (UTC) WP:IP says: ".. They may read all Wikipedia pages (except restricted special pages), and edit pages that are not protected (including pending changes protected/move-protected articles).." Unless policy violation, is it illegal for an IP user to contribute? If I violated policies with IP contributions, is there a page about it, ı dont know recent policies. I have never felt the need to open a new account and have not applied for a single unblock in six years. I acted honestly, became conscious and learned lessons during this time. How do you know if a user is actually changing their contribution and behavioral tendencies without giving them the opportunity? Of course, it is impossible to see this for a user who can only write in the unblock process on the talk page. Maurice Flesier (talk) 00:45, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * It's the my last edit . I remembered this when i checked it my last uploaded files on Commons. You can start any checkuser process, iam confident. I will respect any decision to be made. Thank you for attention and review. Maurice Flesier (talk) 23:59, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Block evasion is always against policy. Your account was not blocked. You the person were blocked. That means you cannot edit any pages on Wikipedia except your Talk page until you the person are unblocked. It is irrelevant whether the IP edits were disruptive. This is not a "recent policy"; it has been true as long as I can remember. The fact that you do not understand this is a major problem.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:02, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Thank u for these helpful clarifications . Honestly, I didn't know that the post-block process and the IP contrib relationship like this. I thought it wouldn't be a problem like other IP users. If I had known this already, I would never have contributed as IP user and would have applied for unblocking in previous years. hen I blocked it, I wasn't very familiar with the policies. Its a more flexible subject in Turkish Wikipedia, I thought it was the same here, sorry I was wrong. Maurice Flesier (talk) 01:42, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

On his own talk page, User:Bbb23 made this comment:
 * Even if nothing other than what we already know is found, I wouldn't unblock for six months from his last block evasion, meaning until April 2023. He also needs to understand that what he did was a clear violation of policy and, in my view, defeats his argument that he is ready to be unblocked. At best there is a serious lack of understanding of how things work. – EdJohnston (talk) 16:31, 5 November 2021 (UTC)


 * Since 2015 I haven't been able to contribute on EnWiki, so I can just try to prove that a user can change by giving examples from other Wikimedia projects and language versions. My contribution history improved into from comments on the talk pages and pointless edit wars to creating content such as making updates, enhancements and expansion on articles, creating new articles and uploading photos on Commons. (Main: 71.5%, Talk pages:7.1%) For the first time, I applied for a grant as a member of Wiki Cemeteries User Group individually for a photo-walk event to be attended by members of the Turkish Community. I attended and gave speeches at many national and international online events and meetings, ı was also among the active perticipants in many edit-a thons.   I'm one of the first supporters of the update and revision request for the blocking policy of TR Wiki in 2020. I'm now defending the necessary arguments for "the free advencement of knowlegde", not according to people and situations. I have changed from a policy vialator to a user who is asked for his opinion on policy proposals, and as a user ı have always advocated fair methods and tried to do the best for our guidelines. If you have more questions about my conribs and behavior, you can also contact Wikimedia Turkey User Group (WMTR) management committee members and also User:Elmacenderesi. Once again, I request you to remove my indefinite block. Maurice Flesier (talk) 19:15, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Maurice, your best plan is probably to apply for unblock again in April 2022 which will be six months after your last sock edit. You would need to refrain from editing the English Wikipedia with any account or IP during that period. See WP:Standard offer for the terms. During the six month period you could still make contributions to other Wikipedia projects, such as the Turkish Wikipedia or Commons. EdJohnston (talk) 01:36, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi . I have read the entire essay and I promise to follow the relevant procedure and your suggestions. I will not do any block evasion actions for six months or more. Of course I will continue to contribute to other Wikimedia projects in the same way, it's a addiction :) Thank you so much for your interest and review Johnston. Maurice Flesier (talk) 02:39, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

Unblock request 2022
Checkuser data thankfully shows no evidence of recent block evasion. --Yamla (talk) 09:29, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Support. Maurice Flesier has been following the terms of WP:Standard offer, as explained to him back in November 2021. What he is appealing is a conventional admin block, though I made it at AN3 on 5 May 2015 following some reports at AE about nationalist editing. In my opinion Maurice's block can be lifted, subject to the existing AE restriction from 2014. That was a topic ban from "everything related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related ethnic conflicts". The closing admin at AE in 2014 was User:Callanecc. There is also a topic ban from Greek-Turkish relations imposed here at AE by DeltaQuad in 2013. These bans are still documented in WP:DSLOG. An AE appeal does not seem necessary since Maurice is not asking to have the topic bans lifted. EdJohnston (talk) 13:40, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm okay with an unblock provided the two TBANs remain in place. As the blocking admin you can probably just do it Ed. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:14, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Fwiw as the admin who declined the previous unblock appeal: per Callanecc, support an unblock this time on the basis that the TBANs are retained. -- Euryalus (talk) 14:15, 7 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your review and a new opportunity., , , , . Maurice Flesier (talk) 13:14, 12 May 2022 (UTC)