User talk:Adem20/Archive 4

dear sir. Dayanidhi Paramahansa Dev and Chandradhoja Paramhansa Dev are not for promotional. information about them is absolutely correct and I'll give my best to give more information about them. Please undelete them sir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rexfaster (talk • contribs) 14:23, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I'm not a administrator, so I'm not a user with the authority to delete and retrieve it. You need to communicate with the administrator who deleted the page. --Adem20 (talk) 14:25, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Your review of European Economic Area Act 1993
The dates & locations given in the lede do not agree with the infobox. Please take a bit more care reviewing. Cabayi (talk) 11:34, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

A cookie for you!
Thank you ZooPro :) --Adem20 (talk) 12:23, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!
Thank you Shawrix :) --Adem20 (talk) 13:46, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Dayanidhi Paramahansa Dev
Hello Adem20. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Dayanidhi Paramahansa Dev, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''Content is found in the infobox. Also, please avoid tagging blank pages one minute after they're created.''' Thank you. Primefac (talk) 14:00, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

I will be very careful. --Adem20 (talk) 14:01, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Categories the Wikipedia page
How to categories the Wikipedia page? Please help me out. Santoshsahni Santoshsahni (talk) 14:01, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello Santoshsahni, To add or remove page categories, you must enable the HotCat feature. Special:Preferences - - -> On the Gadgets tab, check the HotCat checkbox. --Adem20 (talk) 14:07, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Can you add the categories page as "Colleges/Universities / Bengaluru / mba" Santoshsahni (talk) 15:28, 20 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Adem20 (talk) 18:02, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you
Hello. Thank you for reviewing my article Daniel V. Jones. I wonder if it would be possible for you to do the same with these two I made: I never received a "page has been reviewed" notification.

Murder of Diana Miller

Lea Mek

Inexpiable (talk) 17:41, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I've marked the two pages you mentioned as "examined". --Adem20 (talk) 18:03, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

Thank you Inexpiable (talk) 18:54, 20 January 2017 (UTC)

2006 World Baseball Classic Final
Hi,

I don't want to sound like I'm "talking above my station" as you've been here longer than me, but I noticed that you curated 2006 World Baseball Classic Final but missed that the lead required more citations (for example, the last sentence) and the link rot it could be exposed to so I've re-tagged it: hope you don't mind.

Thanks!

Dr Strauss  talk  20:22, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mahmut Bilgen


The article Mahmut Bilgen has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability satisfying WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pam D  23:44, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Sjabloon:Efn
Hello Adem20. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Sjabloon:Efn, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''Technically this is a template (just not translated), the content is hidden in  tags. Still going to be deleted, but something to keep an eye out for.''' Thank you. Primefac (talk) 16:10, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Review Request
Hello Adem20, would you please review and verify the new article that I just made: Mu'min Ainul Mubarak just like you did to the other article: Muammar ZA. Thank you very much for your cooperation. AWG97 (talk) 12:51, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅, I marked the substance you mentioned as "reviewed". --Adem20 (talk) 12:55, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Boss 2 (2017 film)
Hello Adem20. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Boss 2 (2017 film), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: There is sufficient context to identify the subject of the article. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 13:40, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

You can edit the article.--Adem20 (talk) 13:43, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the review
Thanks for the review at Frank Moss (Virginian). For some reason, James E. Stewart has not been reviewed. Could you take a look for me? Thanks in advance for any help. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 14:49, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ --Adem20 (talk) 14:55, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks again. TheVirginiaHistorian (talk) 00:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Thanks for reviewing GCcollab, Adem20.

Unfortunately Meatsgains has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

"Consider adding reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability."

To reply, leave a comment on Meatsgains's talk page.Meatsgains (talk) 15:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Meatsgains (talk) 15:01, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Adem20, I saw you reviewed Every_Fool_His_Own_Tool, thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jungle george (talk • contribs) 16:49, 25 January 2017 (UTC)


 * ✅--Adem20 (talk) 19:50, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi Adem20, I saw you removed the picture I posted on my edit for Mathieu St-Pierre. The artist specifically changed the copyright on this photo to have it uploaded to Commons, he changed it to Public Domain Dedication (CCO) - please undelete the photo if this is suitable. I am in contact with the artist so he can change copyright if need be. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hurleyac (talk • contribs) 07:50, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Hello Hurleyac, I did not remove the file from the article, it was deleted in and removed by a bot. I'm not an administrator, I'm not a user with delete and retrieve privileges. You need to contact the administrator who deletes this file. --Adem20 (talk) 08:32, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Robert Snyder (civil servant)
Hello Adem20, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Robert Snyder (civil servant), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: '''per WP:CSD, having an infobox is sufficient content to fail A3. As SecVA he fails A7 as well.''' You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you.  So Why  12:04, 26 January 2017 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello Adem20. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at Euan Wilcox. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. — Non-Dropframe    talk  16:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

New page remover right removal
Hi. I have taken away the bit that allows you to mark pages as patrolled as too many problems have slipped past your attention. For example with Chandradhoja Paramahansa Dev which should at least have had a copyedit tag added. (from the kind of errors could this be written by a troll?). You can still mark pages with no categories or add other kinds of tags. But please follow the advice that others have given. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 20:37, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm Graeme Bartlett. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Chandradhoja Paramahansa Dev, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:24, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gençay Gürsoy has been accepted
 Gençay Gürsoy, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created. The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article. You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. . Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia! SwisterTwister  talk  04:02, 29 January 2017 (UTC)
 * If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  .
 * If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thank You For Your Review
Hello, I sincerely appreciated your effort to reviewed my new articles: DJ Greatest Hits (album)‬, ‪Daniel: Live! (concert)‬, ‪DJ Classics: Back at the Araneta‬, and Most Wanted (concert).

Best Regards

Puchicatos (talk) 05:14, 29 January 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Harish Jagtani
Hello Adem20. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Harish Jagtani, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not previously been deleted via a deletion discussion. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 14:22, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mehmet Akarca


The article Mehmet Akarca has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Lacks notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cabayi (talk) 14:06, 31 January 2017 (UTC)