User talk:Adem20/Archive 5

Hello Adem20. You tagged "Alexander Gaalema" for speedy deletion, but you did not notify the article's creator that it had been so tagged. There is strong consensus that the creators of articles tagged for speedy deletion should be warned and that the person placing the tag has that responsibility. All of the major speedy deletion templates contain a pre-formatted warning for this purpose—just copy and paste to the creator's talk page. Thank you. AusLondonder (talk) 14:44, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Adhere to Wikipedia rules
If you wish to edit any article it is part of the guideline that an author must indicate or provide an explanation of what action he had just carried out. Do follow due process next time so as to avoid strenuous activities & unnecessary complications that are likely to occur due to our negligence of the rules and regulations.

That being said, Do have you a wonderful day. Celestina007 (talk) 21:09, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

No, I'm trying to help the occasional editors. --Adem20 (talk) 07:41, 3 February 2017 (UTC)


 * How does leaving an edit summary prevent you being helpful to occasional editors?
 * -- Cabayi (talk) 10:18, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * -- Cabayi (talk) 10:18, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

No, it does not prevent me, I can help the editors even without using edit summary. --Adem20 (talk) 12:13, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

Jonathan Michael Lindsay
Hi there! I very much appreciate your work patrolling new pages. However, I'd like to draw your attention to Wikipedia's policy on biting the newcomers. Tagging a page for deletion moments after creation is considered uncivil and may drive away newcomers whose edits are made in good faith. It's generally a good idea to give a page no less than 10 minutes before tagging unless, of course, it's an attack page or some other sort of vandalism. If I can be of any assistance, you know where to find me. — Non-Dropframe    talk  21:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

John Plankinton statue
Adem - I think you were a little quick to tag my new article as unreferenced and uncategorized BOTH within 1 minute of when I created it as a new article. Perhaps you should wait a day or 2 to see what happens to a new article. I have a pretty good idea what to do with my background of a few Did You Know articles and a few GAs. I would recommend to wait at least 1 day to see what happens to a new article = probably many of these things will be ironed out AND THEN you can save your a lot of work. Just some ideas for you, as obviously you are new at this.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 13:20, 4 February 2017 (UTC) Excuse me, I'm be very careful after that. --Adem20 (talk) 14:12, 4 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.2
Hello , We now have New Page Reviewers! Most of us requested the user right at PERM, expressing a wish to be able to do something about the huge backlog, but the chart on the right does not demonstrate any changes to the pre-user-right levels of October. The backlog is still steadily growing at a rate of 150 a day or 4,650 a month. Only 20 reviews a day by each reviewer over the next few days would bring the backlog down to a managable level and the daily input can then be processed by each reviewer doing only 2 or 3 reviews a day - that's about 5 minutes work! It didn't work in time to relax for the Xmas/New Year holidays. Let's see if we can achieve our goal before Easter, otherwise by Thanksgiving it will be closer to. Remember that we are the only guardians of quality of new articles, we alone have to ensure that pages are being correctly tagged by non-Reviewer patrollers and that new authors are not being bitten. This is even more important and extra vigilance is required considering Orangemoody,  and
 * A HUGE backlog
 * Second set of eyes
 * Abuse
 * 1) this very recent case of paid advertising by a Reviewer resulting  in  a community ban.
 * 2) this case in January of paid advertising by a Reviewer, also resulting in  a community ban.
 * 3) This Reviewer is indefinitely blocked for sockpuppetry.

Coordinator election
Kudpung is stepping down after 6 years as unofficial coordinator of New Page Patrolling/Reviewing. There is enough work for two people and two coords are now required. Details are at NPR Coordinators; nominate someone or nominate yourself. Date for the actual suffrage will be published later. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Coccinia pwaniensis
The only two existing sources for information on this species are cited under "Literature". --Pharaoh han (talk) 15:37, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

DYK for Beryl Rawson
— Maile (talk) 12:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Rahul Sinha (artist)
Hello Adem20. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Rahul Sinha (artist), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. Thank you. Primefac (talk) 15:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

Deletion review for Daniel A. Norman== An editor has asked for a deletion review of Daniel A. Norman. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. ==

Deletion review for Daniel A. Norman
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Daniel A. Norman. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

Speedy deletion declined: Kanchanjungha fm
Hello Adem20. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kanchanjungha fm, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article has context. Thank you.  So Why  11:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017
Hello Adem20. Thanks for patrolling new pages – it's a very important task! I'm just letting you know, however, that there is consensus that we shouldn't tag pages as lacking context (CSD A1) and/or content (CSD A3) moments after they are created, as you did at Jordan Micah Johnathan Jordan. It is also suggested that pages that might meet CSD A7 criteria not be tagged for deletion immediately after they are created. It's usually best to wait at least 10–15 minutes for more content to be added if the page is very short, and the articles should not be marked as patrolled. Tagging such pages in a very short space of time may drive away well-meaning contributors, which is not good for Wikipedia. Attack pages (G10), blatant nonsense (G1), copyright violations (G12) and pure vandalism/blatant hoaxes (G3) should of course still be tagged and deleted immediately. Thanks. — Non-Dropframe    talk  15:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated
Hi, I'm DrStrauss. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Koohi Goath Hospital, Karachi, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Dr Strauss  talk  18:47, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Salih Tanyeri
Hello Adem20,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Salih Tanyeri for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Dr Strauss  talk  23:01, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Wrangell Public Schools
Hi! I revised the tagging to "refimprove" since I did include a link to the official website. WhisperToMe (talk) 15:16, 14 February 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Bekir Yıldırım
Hello, Adem20,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Bekir Yıldırım should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Bekir Yıldırım.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

DarjeelingTea (talk) 18:47, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Turan Falcıoğlu
Hello, Adem20,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Turan Falcıoğlu should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Turan Falcıoğlu.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

DarjeelingTea (talk) 18:50, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Deletion discussion about Şerif Erol
Hello, Adem20,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Şerif Erol should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Articles for deletion/Şerif Erol.

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks,

DarjeelingTea (talk) 18:51, 15 February 2017 (UTC)

Your work
Hello, Adem20. I just wanted to remind you that there exist a total of 59 articles and 540 drafts created by you (as of yesterday). Most of those drafts that are unreferenced BLPs are likely to get deleted if they remain stale for too long. It would be really great if you could spend more time in fixing up these articles and drafts. Patrolling of new pages is something that' best left to experienced editors, as inaccurate tagging of CSDs - which newbies do quite unwittingly and in good faith - can cause new contributors to be driven away from the project. For your convenience, I have put up a list of your pages over at user talk:Adem20/drafts - you may remove or check-mark entries to indicate that you fixed them up. You can use the tool reFill to expand bare link citations. And by the way, someone has already mentioned you at the Turkey project talk page. All the best! 103.6.159.84 (talk) 14:55, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Haydar Erol) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Haydar Erol, Adem20!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for taking the time to create this article - it's appreciated. Could you please look it over and see if you can address the issues raised in the improvement tags? Thanks in advance for any help you can offer. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 15:41, 18 February 2017 (UTC)"

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

A page you started (Suut Kemal Yetkin) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Suut Kemal Yetkin, Adem20!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for taking the time to create this article - it's appreciated. Could you please look it over and see if you can address the issues raised in the improvement tags? Thanks in advance for any help you can offer. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 15:41, 18 February 2017 (UTC)"

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Thank you so much. :) I will write articles in draft namespace. --Adem20talk 15:49, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Mustafa Yuluğ) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Mustafa Yuluğ, Adem20!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for taking the time to create this article - it's appreciated. Could you please look it over and see if you can address the issues raised in the improvement tags? Thanks in advance for any help you can offer. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 15:43, 18 February 2017 (UTC)"

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of Hüseyin Avni Botsalı


The article Hüseyin Avni Botsalı has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Ambassadors don't meet WP:POLITICIAN and I can't see how he meets WP:GNG or any other part of WP:NOTABILITY.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 15:46, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Mehmet Bulut) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Mehmet Bulut, Adem20!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"Thanks for taking the time to create this article - it's appreciated. Could you please look it over and see if you can address the issues raised in the improvement tags? Thanks in advance for any help you can offer. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 15:49, 18 February 2017 (UTC)"

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Proposed deletion of Özdem Sanberk


The article Özdem Sanberk has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern:
 * Ambassadors don't automatically meet WP:POLITICIAN. Doesn't appear to meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Boleyn (talk) 16:05, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

Reviews
All the articles you created have now been reviewed. Thank you for taking the time to create so many articles, especially on Turkish peopel, who are under-represented on English Wikipedia. I hope you aren't put off by the proposed deletions and improvement tags - someone prepared to put in as much work as you have is very welcome as an editor. I think you've just spread yourself a bit thinly and so lots of the articles don't really make it clear why the person is notable. Wikiproject Turkey and Wikiproject Turkish politics may be worth asking for help. Best wishes, Boleyn (talk) 16:23, 18 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review-Patrolling: Coordinator elections
Your last chance to nominate yourself or any New Page Reviewer, See Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Coordination. Elections begin Monday 20 February 23:59 UTC. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:17, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - newsletter No.3
Hello , Voting for coordinators has now begun HERE and will continue through/to 23:59 UTC Monday 06 March. Please be sure to vote. Any registered, confirmed editor can vote. Nominations are now closed. We now have New Page Reviewers but despite numerous appeals for help, the backlog has NOT been significantly reduced. If you asked for the New Page Reviewer right, please consider investing a bit of time - every little helps preventing spam and trash entering the mainspace and Google when the 'NO_INDEX' tags expire. Discuss this newsletter here. If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Still a MASSIVE backlog

Nasir Khanjan
Maybe the previous version will be deleted having copyright content or having no notability criteria but what's wrong with this please do something for this I spend almost 3 hours by creating this —Wisalahmad523 (talk) 14:31, 27 February 2017 (UTC)

Documentation subpage template
Hi Adem20, and thanks for your updates to the Module:Find sources docs! I just wanted to let you know that you don't need to add documentation subpage to /doc pages for modules, because this is automagically added by MediaWiki:Scribunto-doc-page-header. It's strange that it's added for modules and not templates, I know, but hey, it saves us a bit of work. Best — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 00:04, 1 March 2017 (UTC)