User talk:Adenosine

Mike Jones
Who? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.207.175.154 (talk) 02:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Peer review of bacteria
Hi there. I'd value your input on this article. Thank you. TimVickers 05:18, 25 November 2006 (UTC)
 * This article is now a Featured Article candidate, the nomination page is (here). Thank you. TimVickers 04:51, 27 November 2006 (UTC)

An editor has made some major changes to this article, could you please return to the FAC and provide some feedback on whether or not these are an improvement? TimVickers 21:12, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the month
NCurs e work 17:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Nice figure
Just saw your central dogma figure and it looks great but I am wondering if it is accurate to say RNA to RNA to virus only. There are RNA dependent RNA poymerases involved in siRNA amplification mechanisms for one. David D. (Talk) 10:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Nice figure, but an error
More importantly the red and blue colors are switched on the color key to the central dogma figure. As you have drawn the arrows, blue is the general case and red is the special case. Anon. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 75.132.168.230 (talk) 02:16, 22 December 2006 (UTC).


 * Are plant known as lower life forms? This seems to be from an animal centric POV. There are higher and lower plants, as there are higher and lower animals. I don't think the hierarchy is meant to comparre between animal and plants. David D. (Talk) 22:16, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

Immune system
Hi Mike. HELP! This article has been nominated for FA, but needs editing. If you can spare any time to help us copy edit and clarify I'd be most grateful. TimVickers 05:08, 2 January 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurs e work 09:34, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Userpage -moz-border-radius
I don't know if you know this already, but the -moz-border tag is a mozilla firefox specific style, ie. internet explorer does not display the round corners. This isnt a problem for small radiuses, but large radiuses can have display problems in other browsers, and unfortunately do on your user page. But nice to find another firefox user :). 84.68.176.104 10:00, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Forgot that when im using internet explorer i'm not automatically signed in! The previous comment was me... - Zephyris Talk 10:01, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Stem cell diagram
Hi there. Something seems to have happened to your Stem cell diagram. I'm not sure where it went. TimVickers 01:33, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Where did my picture go!?
Recently a diagram I designed has disappeared in to the void. Where did it go? is now missing, can anyone help? Adenosinetalk 18:39, 11 January 2007 (UTC)


 * Naconkantari deleted it as there was already a copy of the image on it was moved to the Commons. Find it here. --Sopoforic 18:45, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

This month's MCB Collaboration of the Month article is Peripheral membrane protein!
– ClockworkSoul 18:47, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurs e work 16:57, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Fumurate-->Fumarate
It appears some of the SVGs you uploaded had "fumurate" rather than "fumarate". I don't know how many there were, but I fixed the spellings on Image:TCA.svg and Image:Glyoxylatepath.svg. Thanks for making these great pictures! --M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 (T 05:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Antioxidant FAC
Hi there. I wondered if you had time to review this article? The FAC nomination is here. Thank you. TimVickers 05:17, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the month
NCurs e work 16:25, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

Another FAC
Hi there, metabolism this time. Any comments? TimVickers 23:17, 27 March 2007 (UTC)
 * It's passed, I wondered if I could list you on the talk page as somebody who could help with "verification and sources"? TimVickers 15:42, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurse work 19:48, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Adenosine receptors and caffeine
Maybe you'd be interested in looking into this. Regards Samsara (talk • contribs) 10:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the month
NCurse work 21:08, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Nuclear pore
Dear Mike, I am a user of the Occitan wikipedia ; and I would like to know if it could be possible to use your wonderfull drawing of the nuclear pore for the Occitan article  (without a drawing like this one, there would no point in enhancing the article because it would not be very easy to understand) ; I've seen that there is a licence restiction, this is why I wanted to ask you, in case there would be a chance the Occitan wikipedia can use it. Sincerely, Lembeye

Many thanks. Thanks to your drawing, if you go to the Occitan page, you'll see that thanks to you, the article has been enhanced, though, I hope it will be improved soon. We still have a little problem to view it in its page, although the file works perfectly. We'll check that with our manager. Thanks again and congratulation for this drawing and for the others you made (both artistically and scientificly). We all know that biology is nothing without proper illustration. Best, Eric : Lembeye

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurse work 19:55, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Notability of Erica Kubanek
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Erica Kubanek, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Erica Kubanek seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Erica Kubanek, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:28, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:EK1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:EK1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:06, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:EK1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:EK1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:25, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:EK1.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:EK1.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 16:17, 20 July 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the month
NCurse work 12:13, 3 August 2007 (UTC)

Nice work!
I just came across Image:TCA.svg, and I thought, "Nice diagram! I wonder if it's lifted from somewhere, or if it's a nicely free work?" And then I thought, "I wonder if it's a boring, static old GIF, or a nicely-scalable SVG?" And I was pleasantly surprised to discover that the answer to both questions was a resounding "Yes!"! —Steve Summit (talk) 20:52, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the month
NCurse work 06:23, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Uploading your image on Commons
Hi, I uploaded one of your images on Commons. I hope this is okay with you and doesn't break any rules. It seems you released it under a "Commons Attribution ShareAlike License version 2.5", but on Commons I could only enter a 3.0 sharealike license version, so I hope that is not a big problem. Sakkura 18:48, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

transfersome
Can you cite a published source for "transfersome"? --JWSchmidt 13:34, 19 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the the information. And: I know how it goes, I have also been very busy in the real world. --JWSchmidt (talk) 16:24, 21 June 2008 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurse work 15:07, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Cell signaling
I see you have an interest in signal transduction/cell signaling. If you'd like to contribute, I invite you to join WikiProject Cell Signaling. Please feel free to add your name to the participants list, or the guestlist if you are time limited, and dive right in. If that field is too broad, feel free to create mini-projects or task forces dealing with whatever focused subject you are comfortable with. Biochemza, 13:36, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Central Dogma figure
Heya! I just wanted to give you kudos for a beautiful and highly informative figure, far better than my sad little graph. Keep up the good work on the scientific diagrams, you have a real flair for it. -Kieran 15:13, 14 November 2007 (UTC)

Sucrose starch biosynthesis
Hello

Could you create picture(s) for the synthesis of sucrose and starch in plants? (reply here)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurse work 13:12, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurse work 20:31, 5 January 2008 (UTC)

asking permission
Dear Sir,

My name is Sylvia Pratiwi. I'm a lecturer at Faculty of Pharmacy, Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. I'm planning to wite a book about pharmaceutical microbiology and I would like to use the images that you've made(Central Dogma of Molecular Biology, bacterial flagella, bacterial conjugation and T2 phage) at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Adenosine/Gallery

Would you mind giving me information about my possiblity to use this image in my book? Because this book will be commercially published and used as a textbook for undergraduate student here in Indonesia to study about microbiology in pharmacy.

Hope to hear from you soon, and thank you very much for your kindly help and attention.

Yours Sincerely, Sylvia Pratiwi

pipie155@gmail.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.130.245.155 (talk) 05:42, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the Month
NCurse work 08:05, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:HatchSlackpathway.png
A tag has been placed on Image:HatchSlackpathway.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 17:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

your brassica image is incorrect
Dear Adenosine, the brassica image is showing the plants as if they were haploids. This is incorrect. Normal plants are diploids and carry 2n chromosomes. regards Herman van Eck, Geneticist at Wageningen University —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.224.252.10 (talk) 11:29, 20 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I understand what you mean but I don't think it is too much of an issue here. The diagram was not intended just to convey inter-relatedness in the brassica group. Maybe it is a diagram of the DNA in pollen? Or maybe it is the DNA of a haploid genome so that genetic redundancy isn't too confusing (that's what I had in mind). I'd be happy to redesign it if you could suggest a elegant way to design a more accurate model Adenosinetalk 19:20, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Ion Channel
Hi! I have made some simple picture for the ion channel for the polish Wikipedia. If you know somebody, who could translate this to english, you can take it and insert in your Ion channel. The link is: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plik:Ion_channel.png This is only simple scheme, I hope - correct.

I have also made simple scheme, comparing the chemical and electric synapse, placed here: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Electr_and_chem_synapse.png?uselang=pl

Answers, in any, please put in my polish wiki discussion site: http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dyskusja_wikipedysty:Outslider (add new section: http://pl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dyskusja_wikipedysty:Outslider&action=edit&section=new )

Outslider (talk) 14:41, 3 February 2009 (UTC)

T4 Bacteriophage Image
Your graphic of a T4 bacteriophage is excellent. --69.226.100.7 (talk) 06:02, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

Stem_cells_diagram Image
Hi I would like to use your http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Stem_cells_diagram.png image in my website. Not sure if I understand the License hence checking with you We would be a startup software company providing services for biotech companies. 114.143.52.132 (talk) 11:22, 14 February 2010 (UTC)Tanmay
 * Hey! Feel free to use the image however you like. The license is pretty simple: Use, edit, change, etc the picture however you want, just ensure you attribute the work to me or wikipedia. If you do edit or change the picture let other people use it and borrow it similarly. As a personal favor to me, if/when you do you use the diagram, could you send me a link - I like to see how my work is being used. Adenosinetalk 19:12, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Calvin cycle scheme
I removed the otherwise beautiful image of the Calvin cycle until you might repair it. The ketone is not protonated in the ribulosediphosphate. At least, I think I am correct, apologies if I am not.--Smokefoot (talk) 17:08, 2 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up! Fixed, and fixed! Feel free to make any edits yourself in the future! Adenosinetalk 03:18, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

File:HatchSlackpathway2.svg
Carbon dioxide is not a substrate for PEPC as it is shown in this diagram. is first converted to a bicarbonate ion which PEPC adds to PEP. Could you update the diagram to show this please? Maybe add in carbonic anhydrase too as this converts the carbonic acid > HCO3-. Good work otherwise though! If you're feeling like it, it would be better if the cells were joined rather than as separate entities. The substrates are all transported between cells through plasmodesmata, rather than diffusing through the membrane. Let me know if this doesn't make sense. Thanks Smartse (talk) 13:54, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Grrl
GrrlScientist apparently likes your image, but not your spelling. . . dave souza, talk 18:58, 12 June 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Permission for picture usage
Hello Mr Jones, my name is Miloš Šunderić, and I am writing a part of the chapter for certain book about lectin affinity chromatography. I am new at this copyright matters, and not fully aware of the rules, so I would like to ask you If I have a permission to use the picture by the name "Overview of LPS structure", as a example of this molecule structure, if it is possible. Thank you in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chomac (talk • contribs) 09:03, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:HisColumn.jpg


The file File:HisColumn.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused, doesn't seem to have much use to transfer to Commons."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hog Farm Bacon 15:38, 4 November 2020 (UTC)

Suggestion of Correction to the image on DNA Replication Modes
About File:DNAreplicationModes.png. I suppose there might be something wrong with the depiction of dispersive mode. It is, at present, shown that in dispersive mode of replication each strand of a DNA molecule has been paired with that of the same property (e.g., a newly synthesized fragment paired with again a newly synthesized fragment, i.e., thin red with thin red, and red with red). However, M. Delbrück had indicated that each strand in itself has alternating patterns of original and new nucleotides. .
 * Therefore, I would suggest a correction of each duplex of dispersive mode accordingly, in which every strand has patterns of red and thin red following each other and paired reciprocally with the opposite pattern, i.e., thin red with red and vice versa.

Although it may not be of much importance, since it still gains the insight to understanding the Meselson-Stahl experiment, I'm afraid it is not the actual representation of dispersive model proposed by Delbrück.

Thank you for such a useful schema of all three hypotheses of DNA replication. William Savalto (talk) 21:09, 22 March 2021 (UTC)