User talk:AdenosineTriAwesome

A couple of things
Hello. I assume you are also. If that's the case, you should review WP:SOCK, as Wikipedia requires users to stick to only one account in most cases.

Thanks for removing the Powerscore blogspam from Law School Admission Test, I removed one more from the article, and another from List of Yale Law School alumni. These things sometimes slip through the cracks, unfortunately. The LSAC site is far more usable than test-prep site blogs which are selling services but there's still limitations. Although primary sources are useful for uncontroversial details, in general Wikipedia favors secondary sources with a reputation for accuracy and fact checking. WP:SECONDARY and WP:RS explain this. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 22:17, 2 March 2016 (UTC)

Wow, good catch on finding that other user page. This is my first wikipedia account and I'm finally getting the chance to join the editing community. AdenineTriAwesome was actually the account I first made to play around with how the user pages work but I embarrassingly can't remember its password and all attempts to try to retrieve it have failed, so that's why I had to make this AdenosineTriAwesome account instead. Thanks for showing me the WP:SOCK writing and although I can understand how my account switches can seem malicious, the reality is that there's an enthusiastic human just beginning to learn how to use wikipedia's editor interface. If there is anyway to delete that account/user I'd love to find out how without having its password.

Thanks for the thorough follow ups with the Powerscore blogspam! Lastly, thanks for letting me know about the inclination for secondary sources as reference resources I'll try my best to read up on articles and tutorials.AdenineTriAwesome (talk) 00:39, 4 March 2016 (UTC)AdenosineTriAwesome

Your submission at Articles for creation: LSATMax (March 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment they left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LSATMax and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:LSATMax Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:LSATMax reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:10, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:LSATMax


A tag has been placed on Draft:LSATMax, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:10, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, AdenosineTriAwesome, and welcome to Wikipedia!&#32;Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article.&#32;Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
 * The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! Grayfell (talk) 21:11, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: LSATMax (March 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

The comment they left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LSATMax and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:LSATMax Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:LSATMax reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 01:51, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:LSATMax has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:LSATMax. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 01:56, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:LSATMax


Hello, AdenosineTriAwesome. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "LSATMax".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the  or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 12:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC)