User talk:Adeptzare3/Hectane/Talk/Archive 2

Archive sectoral copier and replier
If you want to reopen a section of my archives, please copy that section here to be replied to. --Adeptzare3 (talk). Escalating these tenets, 07:52, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

17. Nomination for deletion of Template:Lion-stub
Template:Lion-stub has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —PC-XT+ 05:37, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

18. Disambiguation link notification for July 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of cities and towns in Greenland before 2008, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Unincorporated. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 18 July 2014 (UTC)

Adeptzare3 (talk) 01:19, 22 July 2014 (UTC) I didn't create that' link.

19. Talk:Battle of Harstings listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Talk:Battle of Harstings. Since you had some involvement with the Talk:Battle of Harstings redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - TheChampionMan1234 07:39, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

20. Hi
Sorry I screwed up Saturn star (talk) 02:20, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

21. Acetylene
Article titles for standard chemical compounds have usually been extensively debated. Chemists call C2H2 acetylene. Nonchemists and students can develop strong views on the vocabulary that professional chemists should employ, but they are contending against a lot of history and tradition. --Smokefoot (talk) 12:36, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * In addition, it is against wikipedia policy to "rename" an article by copying its content and setting a redirect (copying the content is a copyright/licensing violation against everyone who contributed to the article at the old name). See Moving a page for more information about the process to follow. DMacks (talk) 22:30, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

24. User box thing
On this page, you have some kind of article in what is named like a userbox template. You had two copies. I moved one into your userspace at User:Adeptzare3/Boron Chain Chemistry and redirected the userbox copy to it for now, but this seems against policy. I am not sure what you are trying to do with this, and I don't know how to change the Babel parser function to transclude from userspace, but the userbox redirect should be deleted along with the others in Template space. —PC-XT+ 20:26, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Your user page mostly duplicates the content, as well, so I removed the transclusion from there. I also linked the category, since user pages aren't supposed to belong to article categories. —PC-XT+ 22:34, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I deleted the category link. Adeptzare3 (talk) 04:50, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

25. User box thing
User:Adeptzare3/Boron Chain Chemistry, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Adeptzare3/Boron Chain Chemistry and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of User:Adeptzare3/Boron Chain Chemistry during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. —PC-XT+ 22:51, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

I put it on Template:db-g7. Adeptzare3 (talk) 04:48, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for fixing the Babel box. I hope you find productivity, here. —PC-XT+ 11:33, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

22. March 2015
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at XKCD. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- Sam Sailor Talk! 18:33, 11 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

23. March 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:HostBot, you may be blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 03:20, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

26. March 2015
Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Template:Db-g7. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Mlpearc ( open channel ) 04:41, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

27. March 2015
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DMacks (talk) 05:00, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

29. March 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Freezing-point depression. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. DMacks (talk) 04:08, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

28. ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

30. Adeptzare3, what's going on?
Hi Adeptzare3, I'm Peter in Australia, aka Shirt58.

I've reviewed this Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. There was a suggestion that you might be blocked as someone who is not being here to build an encyclopedia.

I see you may have created a number of other accounts: and now

There may be more. It would be in your interest to acknowledge them.

You appear to be knowledgeable about organic chemistry. However, most of your recent edits seem to be adding meaningless sub-pages in your user-space.

So:
 * what do you want to do to improve the Wikipedia project?

Pete AU aka -- Shirt58 (talk) 12:02, 21 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Sorry. 21:35, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Adeptzare3, "sorry" is not a reply to Shirt58's question. Do you actually intend to do ant useful edits here? Give specific examples.
 * Shirt58, I doubt whether we will get a useful answer to your question. I am tempted to just go ahead and block now. &mdash; RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:13, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I haven't seen anything useful to edit for a while. Adeptzare3 (talk) 23:16, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Talk:Decene? Adeptzare3 (talk) 23:24, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Adeptzare3: that we are born the way are is because we were born the way we are. It's not something to apologize for. We were just born that way. I'm a Wikipedia administrator. That's a pretty strong indicator that I'm not neurotypical. (BTW: how are you with jokes and nuances and metaphors? I say this because I just made a joke about myself.) There are a lot of Chemistry-related topics that don't have Wikipedia articles yet. Maybe you could work on starting them? Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:20, 22 March 2015 (UTC)


 * I'll be back in a few days to do constructive edits. Adeptzare3 (talk) 00:09, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm back. Adeptzare3 (talk) 21:30, 23 March 2015 (UTC)