User talk:Adetolu

CS1 error on Forensic science
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Forensic science, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 09:25, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Forensic_science&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1159110493%7CForensic%20science%5D%5D Ask for help])


 * I may not understand what you meant but you can advice on what to do to correct the error. Thanks Adetolu (talk) 10:15, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

June 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines, as you did here at Full Metal Jacket. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page:. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 10:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I need a response on this. Will you ever unblock this account because even after explaining that I made a mistake and that was honest, I also admit that the content is in no way relevant to the community but you are still being adamant. At least I expect a warning and if the same thing was repeated, then you can block the account but that action only shows that your sim is only to block account and maintain your records of award for most account blocking user. This is a volunteer service and this kind of action should be managed in a way that won’t discourage users.
 * thanks Adetolu (talk) 07:50, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Unintentional violation of Reference
I sincerely apologize for violating the rules. I did not have prior knowledge of the restrictions on references. My aim has always been to have positive impact on the community and in any way, I am not associated to the reference provided.

I am doing this as a way to contribute to the Foundation.

thank you for your consideration and I will appreciate it if the account is unblocked as I will get rid of the content immediately. Adetolu (talk) 10:23, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * The material was already removed. You will need to explain how this edit had a "positive impact on the community". Thanks. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:35, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * It was unintentional and I now understand better that it is irrelevant to the community. Adetolu (talk) 12:00, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
 * I will appreciate if the ban is lifted as I have realized my mistake and such will never happen again. Adetolu (talk) 12:06, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Wtmitchell
I apologize for the error committed by me but it was never intended to promote anything against the regulations. Adetolu (talk) 10:26, 8 June 2023 (UTC)


 * I have unblocked you with a reason saying, "This was a serious error on my part. It was a mis-click -- I did not intend to block this user, and I neglected to confirm that my block action produced the block I intended it to produce." This was purely my error and, though after-the-fact apologies don't undo the problem, I do apologize sincerely -- I'm presently very busy off-wiki with work that has short deadlines, and that apparently resulted in a lapse of attention on my part when I ought to have been paying very close attention. That's an explanation, not an excuse -- there is no excuse. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 16:32, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Alimat Abiola


A tag has been placed on Alimat Abiola requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Xegma (talk) 07:03, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Alimat Abiola moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Alimat Abiola. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn (talk) 08:25, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Jane Asinde moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Jane Asinde. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 21:32, 7 April 2024 (UTC)