User talk:Adg10

May 2014
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for Your tagging of articles for speedy deletion has been disruptive. Also I had warned you about creating articles with the only content being db-g7 and you started up again.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. GB fan 01:49, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Please note that while normally you can delete items from this page you may not delete block notices while they are in force. I have replaced the one you deleted. When your block expires I suggest that you restrict yourself to simple article editing until you are more familiar with policies here.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 10:17, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Removal of block notice
You were warned before about removing the block notice. If you do it again, I will remove talk page access. GB fan 16:02, 15 May 2014 (UTC)


 * I will go further than that. If you remove the block notice again I will significantly increase the length of your block. Fair and only warning.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 16:53, 15 May 2014 (UTC)
 * I note that you have left a post, incorrectly in the middle of a block notice, suggesting that you can use CSD category G7 for empty pages only. This is not correct. G7 is for speedy deletion requested by the only significant editor of a page. If you are determined to tag pages for deletion, which again I strongly suggest you do not do until you have greater experience here, you absolutely must get better acquainted with the details of the speedy criteria. If you continue to behave as you did before your block you will quickly find yourself being blocked again - probably for longer.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 19:03, 15 May 2014 (UTC)