User talk:Adhemar

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! &mdash; Khoikhoi 19:28, 13 May 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Notability of Nick Gisburne
A tag has been placed on Nick Gisburne, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Deranged bulbasaur 10:23, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

The Game
I found some more deletion reviews which you may like to add to your page. I am not sure why these DRVs were only given a lifespan of a few hours when the discovery of additional supporting evidence seems a perfectly legitimate reason for a DRV on an article that was deleted over the (heavily debated and contested) inadequacy of that which previously existed.

 

(In each clase, click "show" on the section about The Game to view the DRV) Wiw8 (talk) 19:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Hi. I've moved your most recent prototype article to my userspace and made a few minor edits. I have also compiled a list of sources and evidence of notability. I think it's ready to go to DRV now. Do you think both the prototype article and the list of evidence should be posted at the top of the DRV, or should they be linked to? Do whatever you think is best, I think it's ready now, so you can put it up for DRV if you agree. Thanks, LoserNo1 (talk) 16:33, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Hey, I've been getting some suggestions from admin and we're currently working on this version here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:LoserNo1/The_Game_%28game%29 They have suggested using this to apply for page unprotection first so I may try that soon. LoserNo1 (talk) 01:47, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, thanks for all your help. I did wait for you for a while but I thought what we had was suitable so I put it up. And yes it certainly does infuriate some people, even me sometimes... Lost. LoserNo1 (talk) 18:35, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Sorry
Very sorry about the edit override on Fram summary. I will compare versions and devise a merged version. Usedtobecool ✉️ ✨ 09:10, 3 July 2019 (UTC)
 * On review, it looks the version is already a merge. Was there another edit by you that got lost and didn't record on the history log? I don't know what exactly happens when an edit conflict messes things up. Thanks! And again, very sorry! Usedtobecool  ✉️ ✨ 09:15, 3 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Don’t worry. I too thought that I edited my version immediately afterward, but I don’t find that edit in the edit log. But I don’t mind you expanding the summary of Katherine’s statement, I just wanted the statement included in the list. However I re-added that the statement was made on behalf of the Foundation. — Adhemar (talk) 11:31, 3 July 2019 (UTC)

A survey to improve the community consultation outreach process
Hello!

The Wikimedia Foundation is seeking to improve the community consultation outreach process for Foundation policies, and we are interested in why you didn't participate in a recent consultation that followed a community discussion you’ve been part of.

Please fill out this short survey to help us improve our community consultation process for the future. It should only take about three minutes.

The privacy policy for this survey is here. This survey is a one-off request from us related to this unique topic.

Thank you for your participation, Kbrown (WMF) 10:44, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Hexadecimal’s Etymology
Hello! I’d like to have the opinions of the involved people (idk if merely mentioning their page is enough to highlight them, or if it’s necessary to write on their user pages: so I try both, i’m not very experienced about wikipedia socializing yet). Galex-713 (talk) 17:43, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Schwartzman_demand
Btw do you have a digital version of Schwartzman’s »The Words of Mathematics: an etymological dictionary of mathematical terms used in English«? was the original quote exact? do you know more generally how was Schwartzman related to 90’s (or earlier) hackers and what was his academia and/or possible hacker place? Galex-713 (talk) 18:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Yes, I do (have a digital copy of the quoted text). — Adhemar (talk) 21:26, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)