User talk:AdhiOK

May 2020
Hello, I'm Ost316. I noticed that you recently removed content from Brown Bag Films Home Entertainment without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ost (talk) 02:12, 22 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brown Bag Films Home Entertainment (May 24)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brown Bag Films Home Entertainment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Brown Bag Films Home Entertainment, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Brown_Bag_Films_Home_Entertainment Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Brown_Bag_Films_Home_Entertainment reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 02:43, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brown Bag Films Home Entertainment (May 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Majavah was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Brown Bag Films Home Entertainment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Brown Bag Films Home Entertainment, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Brown_Bag_Films_Home_Entertainment Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Majavah&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Brown_Bag_Films_Home_Entertainment reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

– Majavah talk &middot; edits 16:25, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: 9 Story Home Entertainment (May 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoingBatty was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:9 Story Home Entertainment and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:9 Story Home Entertainment, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:9_Story_Home_Entertainment Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:GoingBatty&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:9_Story_Home_Entertainment reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoingBatty (talk) 18:07, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

== Your submission at Articles for creation: Warner Bros. Global Kids, Young Adults and Classics (May 27) ==  Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Warner Bros. Global Kids, Young Adults and Classics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Warner Bros. Global Kids, Young Adults and Classics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Warner_Bros._Global_Kids,_Young_Adults_and_Classics Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Dan_arndt&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Warner_Bros._Global_Kids,_Young_Adults_and_Classics reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:34, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
PrussianOwl (talk) 06:26, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Columbia Tristar Animation Studios, you may be blocked from editing. PrussianOwl (talk) 06:32, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Street Fighter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Android. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:38, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

How to stop a user from making false edits
Is there anyway to stop user 174.253.65.34 from continuing to undo and revert the edits done by many so that the false information he keeps setting it back to can be stopped? This Wiki has been factual and correct for years until now.. but the mad man keeps going in and reverting the page back to false information 2 or 3 times a day now no matter who changes it back and he's been doing it for months.

I am referring to the page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warner_Archive_Collection — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:8A20:5530:AC8E:950C:FD47:7B06 (talk) 02:57, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

See also sections
Is there a particular reason that you keep ignoring the WP:NOTSEEALSO guidelines by adding links that are already used in the Peacock (streaming service) and Paramount+ articles to their "See also" sections? Per the guideline, "As a general rule, the "See also" section should not repeat links that appear in the article's body". It would be easier on all of us if you would stop doing this to any article. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 04:40, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Blanking somebody else's sandbox
Why would you blank User:Erry query/sandbox? What is wrong with it? Alex Bakharev (talk) 06:45, 31 March 2021 (UTC)

April 2021
Hello, I'm Hakken. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Fortnite Creative, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Hakken (talk) 16:29, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

May 2021
Hello, I'm Uncle Dick. I noticed that you recently removed content from News Corporation without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Uncle Dick (talk) 17:47, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Uncle Dick (talk) 22:17, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Before adding a category to an article, as you did to Category:MotorStorm, please make sure that the subject of the article really belongs in the category that you specified according to Wikipedia's categorization guidelines. The category being added must already exist, and must be supported by the article's verifiable content. Categories may be removed if they are deemed incorrect for the subject matter. Thank you. Uncle Dick (talk) 06:55, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify this for you. Codemasters did not buy Evolution Studios, they only hired the staff. Codemasters does not own Evolution Therefore Electronic Arts doesn't. Evolution is closed but still 100% owned by Sony. It was misreported by a number of news outlets at the time, but Codemasters are on record (see article) explicitly stating that they only hired the staff. - X201 (talk) 07:27, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Warner Bros. Global Kids, Young Adults and Classics has been accepted
 Warner Bros. Global Kids, Young Adults and Classics, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Warner_Bros._Global_Kids,_Young_Adults_and_Classics help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing!  DGG ( talk ) 17:08, 8 May 2021 (UTC)

Please be careful
Your editing at TvOne (Indonesian TV network) and ANTV are borderline edit warring (see Edit warring). I'm bringing this up in order to help you avoid problems. I see that you are reverting an IP that is insistent on their version of the content. The proper way to combat this is to discuss the alternatives on the article talk page and determine what the consensus version is. Having reliable sources (see Reliable sources) that support your content is going to make a lot of difference in talk page discussion. I fully understand from past experience that on occasion people making edits are doing so with less than honorable intentions. Nevertheless, one must make an effort at discussion so that, hopefully, the other party will respond positively and the project can benefit. Consider neutrally worded messages to any Wikiprojects that are listed on the articles' talk pages to bring more editors to the discussion. Always make an effort to avoid the problems described at Canvassing when leaving requests for help. Let me know if you have any questions.  Tide  rolls  15:40, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021
Hello, I'm GPL93. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:14.1.217.198 that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. GPL93 (talk) 19:11, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

June 2021


A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. GPL93 (talk) 19:12, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Liz Read! Talk! 19:21, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

July 2021
Hello, I'm Liz. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Zsukiman that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 05:41, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
 * AdhiOK, furthermore, I have reverted a number of edits you made that were reverting . When reverting an edit that is not clearly vandalism (which these edits weren't), please use a clear edit summary. Otherwise, other editors have no idea whether you were right or wrong to revert. -- Tamzin  (she/they) &#124; o toki tawa mi. 05:45, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021
I'm removing the final warning because, quite frankly, I can't tell what's going on at that page. But removing mass blocks of content without explanation doesn't work here. Please start leaving edit summaries and communicating with other editors. Thank you, 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:53, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
 * AdhiOK, I just saw this pop up on my watchlist, and realized I have this page watchlisted because I gave you a similar bit of advice in the above section. So to reiterate, please use summaries when reverting edits that aren't vandalism. It saves everyone else a lot of time trying to figure out why you made a revert. If you continue to not use an edit summary during reverts, this can be seen as disruptive editing. -- Tamzin  [cetacean needed] (she/they) 04:05, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

September 2021
Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you recently removed content from Talk:Dragan Andrić without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   — DaxServer (talk to me) 08:53, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Allahabad. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 09:04, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello AdhiOK. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Jaring Data Interaktif, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:AdhiOK. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message.  scope_creep Talk  20:56, 20 September 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jakarta Stock Exchange bombing, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Davidelit (Talk) — Preceding undated comment added 00:25, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Hello. I have noticed that you edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:39, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

New message from JalenFolf
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents § Icecreamland and disruptive unsourced editing. Jalen Folf  (talk)  05:50, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liga 2 (Indonesia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kampar.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 29 September 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 26)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Svetlin0/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Svetlin0/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Svetlin0/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Timtrent&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Svetlin0/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fiddle Timtrent Faddle Talk to me 08:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Are You Indonesian?
Are You Indonesian? RickRalli Backup (talk) 12:44, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Yes, I'm Indonesian.... AdhiOK (talk) 16:03, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Removing talk page messages is fine
Hi, removing talk page messages, including block notifications, from one's own talk page is fine. The exception at WP:UP is about declined unblock requests of a still-active block. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 05:48, 21 January 2022 (UTC)


 * This is, for example, about Special:Diff/1067231406. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:26, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polytron (electronics) (January 29)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nyanardsan were:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Polytron (electronics) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Polytron (electronics), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Polytron_(electronics) Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nyanardsan&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Polytron_(electronics) reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nyanardsan (talk) 23:28, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited TUDN (brand), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wade Davis.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: IDX Channel (March 14)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IDX Channel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:IDX Channel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:IDX_Channel Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:IDX_Channel reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:37, 14 March 2022 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Paramount Global Content Licensing. Thank you. Singularity42 (talk) 20:30, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Please stay civil in edit summaries
The situation at Paramount Global Content Licensing got brought to my attention in part because of this edit summary of yours. You should invite the user to discuss the situation at the talk page and do so civilly. (Also, heads-up, there's a WP:Administrators' noticeboard/incidents thread about it.) —C.Fred (talk) 20:31, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at Talk:Paramount Global Content Licensing. Such edits are disruptive, and may appear to other editors to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 20:31, 15 March 2022 (UTC)

Not Broken
Given much of your recent edits, I think you should read and be aware of WP:NOTBROKEN with regards to links. Canterbury Tail talk 15:21, 17 March 2022 (UTC)

Putting back Foxtel Group site
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foxtel&type=revision&diff=1078934094&oldid=1078919298

The Foxtel Group site is the site for the Foxtel company, which is what the Wiki page is about. Foxtel is one of the company's brands.

I've added the link back. --202.56.44.51 (talk) 02:30, 25 March 2022 (UTC)

Be careful
Please be careful of using edit summaries like "SHUT UP". I understand it's easy to get frustrated with problem users, but we need to remain civil. Thanks. BilCat (talk) 19:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Canterbury Tail 192.76.8.70 AdhiOK (talk) 19:23, 27 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Is that supposed to mean something? BilCat (talk) 19:26, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, users are allowed to remove warnings. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 20:06, 27 March 2022 (UTC)


 * They've been told that before on this talk page, along with a warning on being civil in edit summaries from User:C.Fred. Yet their behavior doesn't seem to be improving at all. BilCat (talk) 20:10, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Indeed. AdhiOK, you really need to straighten out your conduct and not worry about other peoples. You are perilously close to a block. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 20:17, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Additionally you really, really need to read WP:VANDALISM and especially WP:NOTVANDALISM to learn what vandalism is. If you continue to call other editors edits vandalism, when they're clearly good faith edits, you will be blocked. Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 13:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC)

re: Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1093



 * This thread was closed without action, but the WP:CIR issues continue. Most recently, reverting the removal of a warning with the edit summary "SHUT UP." In fact I see no purpose to their edits on that talk page at all. As you are familiar, I'd like to hear from you. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 20:42, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * In retrospect, I should've given a warning to AdhiOK for incivility about that editsummary. AdhiOK: please calm down the messages that you leave to other users, whether on talk pages or in edit summaries. Also read WP:BLANKING: users may remove warnings from their user talk pages. (They may not alter messages left by others, though; that's a different matter.) —C.Fred (talk) 20:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the ping. Hm., if you continue to revert the legitimate removal of messages from users' own talk pages (WP:UP), you will probably be blocked from editing to prevent further disruption. Same for repeated invicility.
 * Please avoid disruptively ignoring community concerns about your edits; ideally, you should reply to others' concerns with understandable messages before continuing to edit. You are not strictly required to do so every time, but if talk page messages fail to have an effect on your editing behavior, there's not much left than blocking to enforce compliance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. It should normally be in every user's interest to read and understand others' concerns; Special:Diff/1079620437 is weird. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 20:54, 27 March 2022 (UTC)
 * Now rather than falsely accusing other editors of vandalism they've resorted to falsely accusing other editors of hoaxing. This revert of an IP fixing a formatting error as a "Hoax" is one of the most ridiculous things I've ever seen . I am of the opinion that this editor has not learned anything from the ANI thread and still has disruptive WP:CIR problems. I really don't think that the ANI thread should have been left to be archived with no action. 192.76.8.70 (talk) 00:46, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Recommend a WP:CIR block to give user time to take in our rules and culture. Don't know for how long. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 01:39, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * They've been editing for over 2 years and have nearly 15k edits. Looking through the edits it seems to be mostly WP:OWN behavior, false edit summaries for reverts, and other disruptive editing, with a sprinkle of reasonable edits. If anyone paid attention to the lists of television and movie companies they would be indeffed by now. Any block should be indefinite until they can illustrate that they understand the issues with their editing and can communicate effectively. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:44, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * I agree with my illustrious multinational vegetable friend above. They exhibit massive OWN behaviours and do everything they accuse others of doing, adding info without sources, random changes, and now hoax accusations which they clearly don’t know the meaning of. I’m down for an indefinite so they have to communicate and explain to the community why they should be allowed to have their editing privileges back. <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 11:52, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * In fact since they’re still continuing I’ve gone ahead and done it. <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 11:58, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * When I spoke of time to reflect, I meant more than 20 minutes. More like six months. -- Deep fried okra ( talk ) 13:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Rodrigo franck, you may be blocked from editing. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Do you know, I just got frustrated with him because he neglecting those warning for him.... AdhiOK (talk) 01:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The irony is astounding. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 01:08, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
 * "Irony is so ironic." BilCat (talk) 09:00, 3 April 2022 (UTC)

Blocked
<div class="user-block" style="padding: 5px; margin-bottom: 0.5em; border: 1px solid #a9a9a9; background-color: #ffefd5; min-height: 40px"> You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:.

Until you can demonstrate to the community in an unblock request why you should have editing privileges on Wikipedia, with your disruption, ignoring warnings, accusing others of vandalism and hoaxes, making unsourced edits (and then reverting other editors good faith unsourced edits for being unsourced) OWN behaviour, and a sheer lack of competence and respect for other editors and our policies and more, you are blocked from editing. I suggest you think long and hard about how you’re going to phrase your unblock request. <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 11:57, 2 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Well if that’s your definition of having thought long and hard, this will be short. <b style="color: Blue;">Canterbury Tail</b> <i style="color: Blue;">talk</i> 12:02, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

AdhiOK (talk) 16:57, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Polytron (electronics) (April 4)
<div style="border: solid 1px #F99; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Polytron_(electronics) Articles for creation help desk] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reasons left by DGG were: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: adverrtising. Do not resubmit.

 DGG ( talk ) 07:25, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Sockpuppet investigations/AdhiOK. Thank you. 192.76.8.70 (talk) 02:25, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Closed with finding of high likelihood of socking. --  Tamzin  [ cetacean needed ] (she/they) 16:20, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/120.188.37.200
Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/120.188.37.200, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/120.188.37.200 and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:Long-term abuse/120.188.37.200 during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. 192.76.8.78 (talk) 19:36, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: IDX Channel (June 11)
<div style="border: solid 1px #FCC; background-color: #F8EEBC; padding: 0.5em 1em; color: #000; margin: 1.5em; width: 90%;"> Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by S0091 was:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IDX Channel and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:IDX Channel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:IDX_Channel Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:S0091&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:IDX_Channel reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 18:51, 11 June 2022 (UTC)

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C
<section begin="announcement-content" />
 * You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. 

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,<section end="announcement-content" />

RamzyM (WMF) 23:17, 2 May 2024 (UTC)