User talk:Adhyatmikaam

Copyright
Your addition to Project Management Professional ‎ has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Copying text from other sources for more information. Kuru  (talk)  11:18, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to TÜV Nord, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Sources must be independent of the subject, not the company website. 331dot (talk) 11:50, 5 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Adhyatmikaam


A tag has been placed on User:Adhyatmikaam requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Masum Reza 📞 22:51, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Masum Reza 📞 22:52, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Italicisation, copypasted text from sources
Hello Adhyatmikaam, thank you for your interest in Wikipedia. But almost all of your recent edits have been misformatted, especially your use of italics does not meet Wikipedia's manual of style described at MOS:ITALICS. We generally do not use italics to highlight important or worldwide organizations. Secondly, please do not copypaste content from external sources into Wikipedia. All contributions should be written in your own words. Aside from a copyright or plagiarism problem, most self-published sources about organizations and companies use a certain kind of promotional PR speak that is not suitable for an encyclopedia anyway.

Please stop changing the formatting in articles until you have read the linked MOS information about Wikipedia's own manual of style. If you have any questions about editing or formatting on Wikipedia, please feel free to ask at WP:Teahouse. Volunteers there will be glad to help. Best regards. GermanJoe (talk) 06:23, 8 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Hello, I'm MrOllie. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. MrOllie (talk) 11:03, 30 August 2019 (UTC)

September 2019
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2003:E5:2700:FC01:7DE7:9821:75A:6A91 (talk) 06:11, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 11:47, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Please stop copypasting content from external sources into Wikipedia. Also, please read WP:RS about Wikipedia's criteria for reliable sources. GermanJoe (talk) 10:33, 10 September 2019 (UTC)