User talk:Adidea

Welcome!
Hello, Adidea, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! -- WikHead (talk) 07:34, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style

August 2012
Hello, I'm WikHead. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Comrade Kim Goes Flying without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. The removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, -- WikHead (talk) 23:08, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Comrade Kim Goes Flying, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- WikHead (talk) 03:01, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

In response to your email
Hello, Adidea. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Comrade Kim Goes Flying, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:


 * Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
 * Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
 * Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Spam).
 * Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. -- WikHead (talk) 07:34, 18 August 2012 (UTC)

I have pasted in a standard-issue welcome message (above) that has many helpful links to get you started. It is recommended to use edit summaries to let others know what you are doing, especially when large portions of content are being removed from an article. There are however, components of articles such as the reflist, which should never be removed. A combination of unexplained reflist/bulk content removal is generally a clear sign that the article is being abused... and (as a good Wikipedian) I revert such abuse on sight, without hesitation. Please read the conflict of interest message I've posted above, and open a discussion thread on the article's talk page with your concerns. Make it clear in your post that you are indeed the subject's producer/director. There, you will get feedback and assistance from others who are familiar with the article and topic. I wish you the best of luck with getting things sorted out, and hope there won't be any need for further reverts along the way. Regards, -- WikHead (talk) 07:34, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
 * More