User talk:Aditi Madurai11

May 2017
Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Aditi SM Volunteer", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because You seem to be claiming to be a volunteer, perhaps for the "SM" organisation. You are not allowed to operate accounts on behalf of organisations or to give the appearance of representing them.. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 16:42, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Dear Sitush even though my name doesn't represent any organization and nor representing any of them, I am changing it. Thanks for your note.(talk) 23:09, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

June 2017
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Adi Shankara, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan  -  Let's talk!   11:56, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

August 2017
Hello, I'm Rivertorch. I noticed that you recently removed content from Homosexuality in India without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rivertorch  FIRE WATER   13:51, 25 August 2017 (UTC)

September 2017
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Narayana Guru, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 01:31, 28 September 2017 (UTC)

October 2017
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Saffron terror, you may be blocked from editing. Vanamonde (talk) 14:06, 27 October 2017 (UTC)

November 2017
Hello, Aditi Madurai11. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:


 * avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
 * instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the request edit template);
 * when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
 * avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
 * exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's core content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Comments and requests

Wikipedia is a widely-used reference work and managing conflict of interest is essential for ensuring the integrity of Wikipedia and retaining the public's trust in it. As in academia, COI is managed here in two steps – disclosure, and a form of peer review.

Please note that there is no bar to being part of the Wikipedia community if you want to be involved in articles where you have a conflict of interest; there are just some things we ask you to do (and if you are paid, some things you must do).


 * Disclosure is the most important, and first step. While you need not reveal your identity (anonymity is strictly protected by our outing policy) would you please disclose if you have some connection with Gopi Shankar, either directly, or indirectly through a third party (e.g. a PR agency or the like)? You can answer however you wish (giving personally identifying information or not), but if there is a connection, please disclose it.
 * Peer review – After you respond, we can discuss the peer review process, if appropriate. Please reply below, to keep the discussion in one place.

Thanks! Mathglot (talk) 09:19, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Dear Mathglot Thanks for your message, To make it clear I am not personally associated with Gopi Shankar Madurai but read about hir on dailies, also I am not receiving any payment for all the contributions I make at Wiki, I am more interested in LGBTQIA+ issues in India. Hope i made my point clear. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aditi Madurai11 (talk • contribs) 16:05, November 19, 2017 (UTC)

February 2018
Your addition to Srishti Madurai has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images&mdash;you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.  Lourdes  14:09, 3 February 2018 (UTC)

Gopi Shankar Madurai: just coi-ncidence?
You seem to have an abiding and powerful interest in the article Gopi Shankar Madurai, as well as any other articles touching on topics Gopi Shankar is involved with, such as Srishti Madurai, LGBT rights in Tamil Nadu, and Timeline of Tamil sexual minorities.

I noticed that you contributed by far the majority of the content at the article Gopi Shankar Madurai itself, both by edit count and by byte count. (Ditto for the Tamil version at ta:கோபி ஷங்கர் மதுரை.) On no other page at Wikipedia do you have even a tenth as many edits or as high a proportion of edits. (Second place goes to LGBT rights in Tamil Nadu where you are 2nd with 8.1% of edits, and third place goes to LGBT rights in India where you are 3rd with 2% of edits and 4.8% of text, both of these topics being closely associated with Gopi Shankar.) Your second biggest edit by byte count was in this edit at Timeline of Tamil sexual minorities you added 6kb to a 15kb article, introducing four mentions of Gopi Shankar in the article, where previously there were none, and where the number of mentions of Srishti Madurai (a group founded by Shankar) went from two in the edit before yours, to eleven after your edit. (And, of course, the article Srishti Madurai was created by you, with the kind of self-promotional tone in the edit summary that you typically use in your creations.) In this version of LGBT rights in Tamil Nadu, an anonymous editor in Tamil Nadu added a floating quote box of 1805 bytes spanning half the length of the article and containing a statement by Gopi Shankar. In this edit of LGBT rights in Tamil Nadu you altered a caption of a photo, to include Gopi Shakar's name. Of your first twenty edits after joining Wikipedia last April, eighteen were to Draft:Gopi Shankar Madurai.

Is all of this merely coincidence? Cordially, Mathglot (talk) 01:35, 8 February 2018 (UTC)


 * Possible precursor at User talk:117.222.154.129. Mathglot (talk) 02:02, 21 December 2018 (UTC)

April 2020
Your recent editing history at Swarajya (magazine) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 15:01, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 15:37, 2 April 2020 (UTC)

Important Notice
Doug Weller talk 15:39, 2 April 2020 (UTC)