User talk:Adityanet


 * }

October 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=578677600 your edit] to Historical Vedic religion may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:36, 25 October 2013 (UTC)
 * and from the increasing speculation about, and importance given to, Brahman, the supreme power."'' ) is a historical predecessor of modern Hinduism, though significantly different from it.{{refn|group=note| {{red|&#62;}} Y. Masih (2000) In : A Comparative Study of Religions, Motilal Banarsidass Publ : Delhi, ISBN 81-

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Historical Vedic religion, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Abecedare (talk) 14:38, 25 October 2013 (UTC)

November 2013
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Hinduism. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Abecedare (talk) 16:08, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Hinduism shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Abecedare (talk) 16:32, 25 November 2013 (UTC)


 * It's already added under whole page that Hinduism is Oldest religion, and has oldest culture. Bladesmulti (talk) 18:19, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Sikh, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. S H 12:22, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Caste system in India
Hi, your editing on Caste system in India page constitutes edit-warring and you can get blocked for it. Since you have already received edit-warring notices, I will refrain from posting another one. Since you are making contentitious changes, you should open a discussion on the article's talk page and generate consensus before reinstating the edit. You are also not putting any edit summaries for your edits. Not only is this a general problem, this will not go down well when administrators look at your editing behaviour. Enjoy editing Wikipedia. Cheers, Kautilya3 (talk) 13:25, 27 April 2015 (UTC)