User talk:Adkoon

Image tagging for Image:Philips lumileds small.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:Philips lumileds small.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 01:39, 19 September 2006 (UTC)

Stay awhile
What a coincidence that you should write this article just as I start a project using the product in question! Will wonders never cease. I've improved the article a bit, adding images from your press kit and formatting to follow our style. I'd take a photo of my current project but that's covered by NDA so, no.

What I don't understand is why you didn't put in decent photos to begin with. You don't need to play Mr. Mysterious with your viral marketing super-stealth edit to Wikipedia. A corporation often is the best available source for information about itself. You can't pretend to be unbiased but then, we'll dig up the dirt and add that, too. No need to worry -- either way.

If you're not just a flack for Lumileds but have other clients, feel free to edit articles on those, too. We do ask that you follow our extensive policies regarding articles -- but if you don't, we'll fix it. I suggest that you edit your own user page, declare yourself openly, and as you upload images, simply add licensing information. If you represent a company and assert a license, nobody is going to challenge you. Meanwhile, I've simply asserted Fair use for images from your press kit.

Don't know when or if you'll return but if you do, please drop by my talk page and let me know how I can help you adjust to Wikipedia. Thank you. John Reid 05:52, 25 September 2006 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Designworks
A tag has been placed on Designworks requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on |the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:26, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

Links
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, one or more of the external links you added do not comply with our guidelines for external links and have been removed. Wikipedia is not a collection of links; nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the before reinserting it. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. --Ronz (talk) 22:37, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
 * --Ronz (talk) 22:39, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Designworks logo.jpg


The file File:Designworks logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 11:24, 3 January 2019 (UTC)