User talk:Adkrup

March 2018
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Ossining High School, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Daiyusha (talk) 06:17, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

The edit was not a removal -- rather, it was a consolidation of three very closely related headers ("athletics," "co-educational sports," and "gender specific sports") into a single one. Also, you reverted several updated citations to old data and additions to the history section -- not sure what the problems with those were? Adkrup (talk) 06:33, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, as you did with this edit to Ossining High School, you may be blocked from editing. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  02:23, 22 March 2018 (UTC)

I'm not sure how the neutral point of view for the edit you specified is any different from what you reverted it back to -- it's essentially the same information, in a more concise order. Also you reverted many updated citations to old data and additions to the other sections -- not sure what the problems with those are? Adkrup (talk) 03:18, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll ping for you as well. I'm not sure they read your message.
 * Just so you know, we usually start out with a less severe warning that what Daiyusha and I issued you. Sorry about that. I was using editing software, which determined the level of warning you needed automatically.
 * Neutrality is not what you say, but how you say it. If you write concisely, you're more likely to be writing in a way that complies with our guidelines. You basically rewrote the section to reflect more positively on the program, and it's better to just state the facts. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @  05:16, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Looking through the article (article?) on neutral POV, this makes sense for some other edits (where I call things "notable" - I have to fix that up a bit), but for the edit you specified, the only information I added was "It struggled initially." - can you point out how it's different from what was there originally? Thank you - not used to this type of writing. Adkrup (talk) 05:26, 22 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Hi, I issued the warning to you because you made a big edit(deleted 1500 words) without giving any description. That is usually a red flag. Please make sure you give a description for each of your major edits.Thank you for your contributions. Daiyusha (talk) 06:15, 22 March 2018 (UTC)