User talk:Adlerhanks

Concern regarding Draft:Martha Parke Custis
Hello, Adlerhanks. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Martha Parke Custis, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:38, 23 March 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Martha Parke Custis


Hello, Adlerhanks. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Martha Parke Custis".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 01:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)

Ways to improve Suzanne Wilson
Hello, Adlerhanks,

Thank you for creating Suzanne Wilson.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"This article needs more references to satisfy notability for biography of living persons. What is needed are references giving significant coverage about this person, and independent of them, in multiple secondary sources which are reliable - WP:RS; that is your guide.

You may also read WP:PRIMARY which details the limited permitted usage of primary sources. Pages of photographs, mentions of this person on pages about other topics do not garner notability. Material written by this person does not garner notability. A more comprehensive guide is WP:BASIC ... People are presumed notable if they have received significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources that are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject. Lack of attention to the above is likely to mean that the article may not be suitable for inclusion."

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 08:52, 21 May 2022 (UTC)