User talk:Admantine123/Archive 1

June 2020
Hello, I'm Vanamonde93. An edit that you recently made to Godhra train burning seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Vanamonde (Talk) 16:57, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Yeah true i was testing.

Sorry Heba Aisha (talk) 17:24, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Paswan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhojpur ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Paswan check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Paswan?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:13, 5 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 12
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Bhumi Sena ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Bhumi_Sena check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Bhumi_Sena?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Jahanabad
 * Koeri ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Koeri check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Koeri?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Persian
 * Upendra Kushwaha ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Upendra_Kushwaha check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Upendra_Kushwaha?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to Vaishali

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Thanks
I am also a Bihari and I am happy that you are doing good for us. Amrapahal Pahanswan (talk) 16:35, 19 July 2020 (UTC)
 * ure welcome.If you want me to help you to improve any other article related to bihar.Dont shy and just tell on my talk page.Heba Aisha (talk) 16:41, 19 July 2020 (UTC)

Sister, I have published article on Jagdanand Singh giving a citation by The Economics Times describing his caste，political affluence, till it was deleted. Amrapahal Pahanswan (talk) 16:48, 19 July 2020 (UTC)


 * This is because you copied the whole material from  source u listed there.Wikipedia takes copyright violation very seriously.So you need to write in ur own words.Second ... caste of a living person can be told only if in the source they say themselves that they belong to that particular caste group.If this is not done it amounts to WP:BLP violation.Also you should not use words like great, excellent,  extraordinary etc as one of Wikipedia policy called WP:Puffery and WP:POV tells us to maintain neutrality while writing an article.Start once again that article. ...good luck. Heba Aisha (talk) 08:19, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lalu Prasad Yadav, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Toddy.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 3
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vijay Kumar Shukla, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bania.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 11
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Dalelchak-Bhagaura Massacre 1987
 * added a link pointing to The Telegraph
 * Durvasa
 * added a link pointing to Deva

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 11 August 2020 (UTC)

Majority of People who use " Yadav " surname in Haryana are " Ahirs" only. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Har1990 (talk • contribs) 20:31, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

I have added another source that clearly mentions " 114 were Ahirs" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Har1990 (talk • contribs) 20:33, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Anyways I have removed the Rezang La section for now. I have also removed the image as there was no image before.Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Har1990 (talk • contribs) 20:54, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

I have removed picture.There was no picture in past and I don't think its important to have image of particular individual in this article — Preceding unsigned comment added by Har1990 (talk • contribs) 21:11, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Picture of Ahir King Rao Tula Ram was added. Then someone changed it and added picture of some Individual based on British Raj records. Its better not to have any image here. If you wanna include it, please tell why its necessary.Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Har1990 (talk • contribs) 21:40, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

And I am not sure which one is added first. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Har1990 (talk • contribs) 21:42, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

Peasants and Monks in British India, William R. Pinch
Dear Sis, You are doing awesome work on Wikipedia. congrats! BTW, I noticed you used Peasants and Monks in British India by William R. Pinch at several places.It is freely available here. Please see https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft22900465 Also, for some "pure shudra" castes in early 1800s, please see https://publishing.cdlib.org/ucpressebooks/view?docId=ft22900465&chunk.id=s1.2.11&toc.depth=1&toc.id=ch2 See "Buchanan, in the early nineteenth century, had included in the term “pure shudra” the well-known designations of Kayasth, Koiri, Kurmi, Kahar, Goala, Dhanuk (archers, cultivators, palanquin bearers), Halwai (sweets vendor), Mali (flower gardener), Barai (cultivator and vendor of betel-leaf), Sonar (goldsmith), Kandu (grain parcher), and Gareri (blanket weavers and shepherds).[108]". If you click on the number 108, you will notice that he is talking about Bihar and Patna only. 108. Buchanan, Bihar and Patna, 1811–1812, 1:329–39; Martin, Eastern India, 2:466–70. Buchanan notes that in Gorakhpur both Halwais and Kandus were included as Vaishyas and thus considered twice-born (Martin, Eastern India, 2:465). Also, that chapter refers to North India only. Hence as a general suggestion, we need to be careful before generalizing and need to qualify these groups with "Bihar/Patna" as they may be under different classification elsewhere whenever we use this chapter. As an example, this may not apply to same caste names from other states. For example, Sonar in Maharashtra came from Brahmins and were called Daivadnya Brahmins - and they had thread ceremonies too. I was looking at some of your recent edits and noticed that you were generalizing this statement for disparate groups on some pages. Hence the suggestion. Hope the link helps. Best Regards,LukeEmily (talk) 21:46, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * well thanks..... i will see sources you share.....i Am sick of people trying to glorify caste by removing images etc etc. My edits are on the basis of few books i have read on Bihar's caste and polity which i use in almost all edits.I will see these sources too.ThanksHeba Aisha (talk) 23:45, 13 August 2020 (UTC)
 * You mentioned some editors do not like SUNY press which is an academic press hence I was surprised. Do you know any instances where they have reverted edits from SUNY press? The authors of SUNY press are usually well known scholars.LukeEmily (talk) 22:40, 14 August 2020 (UTC)


 * No, not any incident yet.But I have seen them inadvertently reverted sourced content if some discrepancies are found.Heba Aisha (talk) 23:59, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

AWARD for you
I didn't knew that....adding images brings dis 😀Heba Aisha (talk) 02:59, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Hi Heba, thank you for your edits
My respects to the superior knowledge that you have attained over the years. Thanks for contributing to wikipedia. I saw your recent edits of Kayastha page. You have added a few theories that claim that Bhumihar and Kayastha of Bihar are Shudra. You probably do understand that these contentions have been debated for ages and both these groups have proved beyond doubt their high ritual status in religious as well as legal courts. Nevertheless the contention did exist and you are welcome to add the same to the page. But to be fair, the other side of the contention should also be fairly added. The decision of Banaras pandits regarding these may be impartiality added.

'''As per Padma Purana, Bhavishya Purana and the decision of Banaras Pandits in the year 1779 AD on varna status of various sub-groups of Kayastha, they are considered to be Brahmins. '''

Add the same to Varna/classification section of the page, if you find it useful and relevant. Thanks in advance. I hope you continue the good work. Vikram Q1W2 (talk) 09:14, 15 August 2020 (UTC) If you have doubt then you can ask the above two editors i mentioned or can discuss on Wikipedia india related page discussion forum.If i add they will revert it sooner or later as source you provided is of period before 1947.Heba Aisha (talk) 09:36, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi first of all thanks for saying all this.But,after talking with the senior editors on Wikipedia like Sitush and Utcursch(He is an administrator) i came to know that pre independence era sources on caste related pages are not considered neutral sources as for example: Todd used to write about Rajputs and most of the later historians recognise him as biased author.Same is the case with various communities as those who were close to Britishers due to various reasons tried to prove their higher status and upward mobilisation was evident.As for example: The Kushwaha community, they are also shudra but they tried to assume kshatriya status due to their closeness to the british provided their role in opium production.

No issues, I can provide you a post-1947 book which refers to this letter. Will that help you be impartial? Vikram Q1W2 (talk) 09:43, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Will see and if quality of the source i mean publication is good i must add.Heba Aisha (talk) 09:46, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Yes it is a standard book. Milton Israel’s book of 1987 refers to this translation of Gupte of 1779 AD letter of Banaras Pandits to Peshwa Darbar. Vikram Q1W2 (talk) 09:58, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * What new things you want to be added??Heba Aisha (talk) 10:02, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

'''On the other hand, as per Padma Purana, Bhavishya Purana and the decision of Banaras Pandits in the year 1779 AD on varna status of various sub-groups of Kayastha, they are considered to be Brahmins. '''

Add the same to Varna/classification section of the Kayastha page. Thanks in advance. I hope you continue the good work. Vikram Q1W2 (talk) 10:17, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Bro just see the section above the verna section in Kayastha article.....the same source and the same thing is already thereHeba Aisha (talk) 14:35, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Also, see last passage of varna section....here also CKP is noted as equal to brahmins and its clearly written dereHeba Aisha (talk) 14:49, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

I can't see these sources- anywhere on Kayastha page nor in the reference list. Which page are you looking at? Even if they are there reformatting may be done, since new regional sources have been recently added by you. In my opinion, the above mentioned statement with sources may be added before or after your additions, to present the complete contention. Hope you appreciate the concern. Vikram Q1W2 (talk) 14:57, 15 August 2020 (UTC) ■https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/963210741
 * source 23 is the book of the same author.second I can't write in exactly same way i.e Descision of banaras pundits it will be the violation of WP:POV.Also i am sure padma purana and other purana as verification will not be liked by senior editors so i don't want my edits to be reverted.see for edample Kudumbar article.Here also people who were concerned wrote a lot of good things and Sitush reverted all those things in such a manner that now nothing is there.check the history of that article. YOU shud pray that they don't examine Srivastava article. I doubt they can do similar thing with that too.So chill as some of the sentence still write Kayastha as brahmins.You just glance through their edit history you will know which type of sources they don't wantHeba Aisha (talk) 15:14, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
 * see these edits https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:MobileDiff/963210376

Hey bro, let me give it to you straight, you should pray that your impersonation as a women or a muslim to spread caste and religion based hatred is not discovered soon. The trick that you are trying here has been played for too long on youtube and other platforms. See you after Bihar elections. Till then. Vikram Q1W2 (talk) 15:24, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

●■No personal commentsHeba Aisha (talk) 15:30, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

●■Also for your allegations see WP:NotcensoredHeba Aisha (talk) 15:44, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

This is for you

 * I m sorry if you find it offensive but this is an Encyclopedia and we write what is true.What you are saying and for the purpose you are here is not new.See above a person had same problem as of yours and now he's here with another account to revert all my edits.Hope you not take it in another way.RegardsHeba Aisha (talk) 03:38, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

A kitten for you!
You are welcome.

Fylindfotberserk (talk) 06:17, 16 August 2020 (UTC) 
 * ....thanks btw reason for the gift??Heba Aisha (talk) 07:28, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Firstly, because you thanked my edit. Secondly, you seem to be doing a nice work here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:33, 16 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Glad to know that.I m happy that someone recognised it.Thnk u so much.Heba Aisha (talk) 07:35, 16 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Keep doing the good work and keep discussing with the Wikipedia community whenever you get confused over something. You'll get more of these barnstars and 'gifts'. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:41, 16 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Thanks for guidance.I'll😊Heba Aisha (talk) 07:43, 16 August 2020 (UTC)


 * I reported them. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:53, 16 August 2020 (UTC)


 * He is reverting all my past edits and recently i was creating an article that too.Can i do something in my setting to stop him.I m on mobileHeba Aisha (talk) 09:54, 16 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Restore your edits. But add proper sources like Kamangiri art article, which is unsourced. Secondly, do not make changes on gut feeling like you did here. Change content using source or consult people like Sitush who are well versed in caste/tribe related topics. Sheeba Asia got blocked/indefed See Here. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 10:02, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

Thanku....i was about to add refrence to the article but that message really disturbed me.Btw he was not due to image at Dhangar article.I never add anything without source.Is it possible that someone can misuse my account in the same way.How to protect future redirects..?I m not much techno savy....let me confess.Heba Aisha (talk) 10:07, 16 August 2020 (UTC)


 * The new one also got blocked. They may try again. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 11:13, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

What to do?Heba Aisha (talk) 14:29, 16 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Ms.Heba Aisha I don't mean to snoop on your private conversation with Mr.Fylindfotberserk but you can use Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism and Requests_for_administrator_attention. LukeEmily (talk) 16:10, 17 August 2020 (UTC)


 * There is another, relevant for this kind of troll WP:UAA. Thanks . - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 16:19, 17 August 2020 (UTC)


 * Thnks both of u and . has blocked another Sockpuppet of the troller 😀cheers¡Heba Aisha (talk) 23:49, 17 August 2020 (UTC)
 * Nice. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:09, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

only for you

 * Early morning surprise gift for me....lot of thanks Heba Aisha (talk) 23:51, 17 August 2020 (UTC)

Battle of Maonda
Please check the article Battle of Maonda and Mandholi. There seems to be a lot of changes and removal of trusted sources like Jadunath Sarkar with personal remarks. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:8100:387E:59A6:1:0:54A3:1926 (talk) 05:47, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Please check I have written in my own words. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2402:8100:3853:2302:1:0:54E7:55F1 (talk) 06:48, 18 August 2020 (UTC)
 * calm down report on administrator attention against vandalismHeba Aisha (talk) 07:46, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 19
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Jawahar Singh
 * added links pointing to Mandoli and Bharatpur
 * Battle of Maonda and Mandholi
 * added a link pointing to Mandoli

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:32, 19 August 2020 (UTC)

(Hangsun.576 (talk) 09:32, 23 August 2020 (UTC))

Disambiguation link notification for August 26
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Jawahar Singh
 * added links pointing to Mandoli and Bharatpur
 * Rajput
 * added a link pointing to Chhau

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 26 August 2020 (UTC)

User:LukeSmily
This user left a message on my talk page and your talk page suspecting we are sockpuppets. Interestingly, it happened seconds after I replied on the Rajput page supporting that image you supported. Maybe some admin should intervene and see who LukeSmily is. Obviously, he is after me based on his name. LukeEmily (talk) 19:10, 27 August 2020 (UTC)
 * i don't understand what u are saying.I was trolled by someone u know that let me check if someone again have created redirect to my account Heba Aisha (talk) 01:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * user:LukeSmily is blocked.this is exactly same what happened to me.Someone is also trolling you like that editor did to me by making several accounts namely user:Sheeba Aisha, user:Hiba Aisha user:Heeba Aisha and many more......you may report here.By the way he is blocked.Heba Aisha (talk) 01:32, 28 August 2020 (UTC)
 * I have checked he created a redirect to ur account.whenever u get notification regarding it plz lodge complaint on WP:UAAHeba Aisha (talk) 01:35, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Few editing tips
Hello, Heba Aisha. Please don't move any other talk page comment as that will create further confusion. You should use a colon (see WP:Indentation) to reply to a comment rather than using an asterisk mark. Also, one should provide diffs rather copy-pasting whole comments of other editors – please see WP:Diff.

Finally, an article's talk page is meant for discussing things related to the improvement of that article. So other article or general behaviour of users should not be discussed there – please see WP:TPG. Thanks. - NitinMlk (talk) 11:15, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Ok....Btw plz open sockpuppetry investigation against he is making personal attacks on me by making fake accounts like  and .I m busy elsewhere.TqHeba Aisha (talk) 11:17, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
 * An SPI case can only be opened if there is behavioural evidence between the accounts. I don't think Sajaypal007 is connected to those sockpuppets. So there is no need to open an SPI. BTW, please ignore these sockpuppets and vandals. - NitinMlk (talk) 11:26, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

Ok thank uHeba Aisha (talk) 11:27, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

About the photo you added on the Meenas wiki page
Why you have added a photo with the caption "Meenas, Hindoos of low caste, vagrants, Delhi."?

1. if the source is old does not mean it is correct or reviewed work. How a photo dated -1868 - 1875 is relevant? We are in 2020, do Meenas still live and are vagrants? Do you know how many divisions are there within Meena tribe?

2. Meenas are not natives of Delhi, as photo caption is stating.

3. Meenas in Rajasthan come under tribe, NOT a CASTE and do not fall under Hindu cast systems, hence, no point in stating low or hight cast.

So, the photo and caption are misleading and do not represent the correct status of Meenas. So, please remove it or find a photo represents Meenas in factual terms. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.242.49.5 (talk) 21:44, 30 August 2020 (UTC)
 * what i find after tiring search was that pic only if u have another one give it i will replace tqHeba Aisha (talk) 07:01, 31 August 2020 (UTC)

A few photos of Meena/Mina tribe: 1822 to 1890s..to replace the current photo from Meenas wiki page.
 * http://www.smb-digital.de/eMuseumPlus?service=ExternalInterface&module=collection&objectId=1633129&viewType=detailView
 * http://www.smb-digital.de/eMuseumPlus?service=ExternalInterface&module=collection&objectId=1633081
 * http://www.smb-digital.de/eMuseumPlus?service=ExternalInterface&module=collection&objectId=1633126
 * http://www.smb-digital.de/eMuseumPlus?service=ExternalInterface&module=collection&objectId=1633069
 * Plz upload on wikimedia commons. I will surely replace. Images are good.Heba Aisha (talk) 00:15, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Important notice
GeneralNotability (talk) 00:40, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi GeneralNotability i think it was misunderstanding from my side.Due to prolonged discussion on an atricle i came to conclusion that it was .But i think i was wrong.As a number of new accounts have been formed to attack me i was perplexed.Hence i want this sockpuppet investigation to be closed.Heba Aisha (talk) 00:47, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 2
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * History of Patna
 * added a link pointing to Licchavi
 * National Highways Authority of India
 * added a link pointing to National Highway

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:30, 2 September 2020 (UTC)

Content about racist views of Richard Nixon for indians was removed
Declassified documents from the Richard Nixon Presidential Library show that Nixon held deeply racist views for the Indian people and sexual hatred for Indian Women as revealed by author Gary J. Bass. Describing Indian women as "undoubtedly" the most unattractive women in the world. Also describing Indian people as the most "sexless" and "nothing" people in the world. At one point comparing indian people with "African blacks ", stating that atleast they have an "animallike charm" but the Indians were "ack, pathetic".

This content is sourced from a recent article in the NYT but it was still removed. Could you have a look ? Meethamonkey (talk) 06:21, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Which article ??Heba Aisha (talk) 11:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Ok i got it .....will see when get time.Heba Aisha (talk) 11:18, 5 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi
Regarding the removal of content from talk page, I did remove only two discussion, both were related to you. You put fake warning of edit war and block. Edit war is considered when you make atleast 3 reverts within 24 hrs. And that was not that. I see you also removed such fake warnings from your page put up by someone and its ok. Because they were fake warnings. You can remove this discussion too if you wish. And for Rajput page, I again ask you to keep the discussion short and relevant to the matter. Other matters if you want to discuss then create separate discussion page for that. @Kautilya3 I believe has not much time in hand so try to keep it comprehensible. Thanks. Sajaypal007 (talk) 13:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The warning to me was from a sockpuppet and not only me but admins also removed it from my page.check history.Heba Aisha (talk) 14:18, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
 * I will post some comments on the Talk:Rajputs page. Both of you need to keep the discussion focused on the content, and avoid all conduct-related discussions. Conduct can be discussed on User talk pages, if need be. But most of the time, it is not productive to do so.
 * Edit war occurs when editors who disagree about the content of a page repeatedly override each other's contributions . 3 reverts is called the bright red line, after which you will get automatically blocked. But edit-warring begins at the second revert itself. So, only one revert is normally permissible, that too with well-justified, policy-based reasons. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 16:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 9
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Coastal Regulation Zone
 * added links pointing to Creek and Backwater
 * Department of Agriculture, Co-operation and Farmers Welfare
 * added a link pointing to Economic Times
 * Reserve Bank of India
 * added a link pointing to Economic Times
 * Tribal Co-operative Marketing Federation of India (TRIFED)
 * added a link pointing to Raigad

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Hi, regarding your constant following of my edits
If you don't mind I think I feel like you are following my edits and then try to edit that and related pages. For singular incident I think it wont be any problem, but lately I am feeling that for every history related article i edit you will reach there and edit it. It feels like I am being watched everytime. It may also lead to some conflict if you continouosly edit after my edits where you earlier never edited. We already have our differences in other articles and if you keep on doing this, we may get other conflicts on some other pages, I request you to not do such things. You never in your edit history ever touched those articles ever, you even had little knowledge about the subject, (by look of that talk page), nonetheless as soon as I edited that you will reach on that page and edit it alongwith other related pages. This may amount to Harassment, so I will suggest you refrain from such acts in future. Sajaypal007 (talk) 07:16, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Plz i just corrected citation and didn't touch even a word on the article.And anyone can improve any article.Harrassment happens when anyone tries to inhibit other but instead i m supporting ur edits in the articles.Heba Aisha (talk) 08:39, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Please read the rule carefully. To quote a part, "Even if the individual edits themselves are not disruptive per se, "following another user around", if done to cause distress, or if accompanied by tendentiousness, personal attacks, or other disruptive behavior, may become a very serious matter and could result in blocks and other editing restrictions." Your constant following is causing distress for me. History of Rajasthan is my field of interest, I have never seen you editing anything related to Rajasthan history before our confrontation, even today you got confused Chunda of Mewar with Chunda of Marwar, it says how much you know about the subject. Anyway my point is please do not follow my edits, there are different ways to cite sources, mine is different from yours. And also in don't create multiple discussion, I asked you here, you should reply here instead of going over my talk page and replying half of the answer there. I don't have so much free time in mind end as you do and can't discuss on multiple fronts. So please request you not to follow my edits. You have been doing that since last month after Rajput origin controversy. I never follow your edits or make edits on your interest pages after you edit them. Last time I am requesting you to not follow my edits, it cause constant distress and inhibit my ability to work freely on wikipedia. I hope you understand that. Thank you in advance. Sajaypal007 (talk) 09:31, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Ok not follow ur edits but history is my field of interest and it is possible that i could edit other articles related to Rajasthani history.And you may not feel problem for that.Heba Aisha (talk) 10:51, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * , I dont think that this user is hounding your edits in a bad cause. According to the information page Correct use of an editor's history includes (but is not limited to) fixing unambiguous errors or violations of Wikipedia policy, or correcting related problems on multiple articles. In fact, such practices are recommended.. As the user said that he/she only corrected citations (fixed unambiguous errors), therefore it isn't prohibited. If the user is really watching your edits in a good cause then it's permitted. In the start, my edits were also watched by some users, but that helped me to learn more and find my errors. Being watched by users, made me more attentive. Soon, they left watching my edits when I didn't react to them. However, I'll also suggest this user to keep the discussion at single place, not to make it scattered. Thank you.  Empire AS  Talk! 11:59, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank u .....Yar see he just edited Lakha Singh...Yes i visited there to see his edit history....but soon i found requirement of edits in other articles too....so i edited Mokal Singh and created a new article Chunda Sisodia too......i m not strictly bound to an article but working on a number of articles and number of subjects.'''Heba Aisha (talk) 12:04, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * It's right to follow any user's edits in a good cause like correcting errors and problem as stated above. But not the contributions be followed for disruption or personal attacks. As I see, you just expanded refs and corrected grammar. So, I wouldn't say it harassment. Thank you. Empire AS  Talk! 12:18, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
 * You don't know our dispute history. Our dispute is still going on another page. Also this is not first time, she edited some other articles after me and not for fixing my errors. It happened many a times while we are already in dispute on a page. Regarding that you should read the policy which I quoted verbatim above. Good faith edits can be considered as harrasment if you are constantly doing that, and that too with a guy you have been in a dispute. And I already asked her to not do that it is inhibiting my working on wikipedia and making the environment here distressful. Also I my citation style is different, its not like there is a necessity to link google books, its not a wikipedia rule. So I didn't commit any mistake at all. If she want link google books in wikipedia there are thousands of links she can work on. @HebaAisha I am again asking you to please stop this.

Disambiguation link notification for September 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Department of Agriculture, Co-operation and Farmers Welfare, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Doctor and Rabi.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:07, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks Heba
Hi Heba, Thanks for that badge. Best Regards. LukeEmily (talk) 18:21, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * welcome....keep doing good edits and i will be updating ur badge as per number of edits and days passed on wiki.Heba Aisha (talk) 20:09, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Please may I request you and to participate in the Rajput talk page discussion? Thanks LukeEmily (talk) 16:14, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Template:Service awards
Hi, I saw that you are using Apprentice Editor on your user page. However, I'll suggest you to use the Template:Service awards. It will automatically upgrade your awards. What you need to do is to just update your edits. It's just a suggestion otherwise you are using the award template that is right too. See my awards page. Hope it works. Thank you. Empire AS Talk! 01:55, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks.... i m learning various features of wikipedia slowly slowly.Btw thanks for suggesting.Heba Aisha (talk) 08:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Great, However you indented your reply multiple times. Just increase one colon before your every post. See WP:INDENT for more. Thank you.  Empire AS  Talk! 09:43, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Thnaks...now did as you advised.Heba Aisha (talk) 12:17, 17 September 2020 (UTC)


 * 😀Face-angel.svg. I got confused! Empire AS  Talk! 12:31, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
 * In my last comment i indented in the way u advised.Heba Aisha (talk) 01:53, 18 September 2020 (UTC)


 * May be. But I don't see that. Now, in your latest reply to me, the indentation again went wrong. Just increase only 1 colon than the previous reply. You'll learn that soon. Thank you.  Empire AS  Talk! 04:02, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
 * okHeba Aisha (talk) 15:17, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Violence against animals in India for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Violence against animals in India, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Articles for deletion/Violence against animals in India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:04, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 23
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Malwa Sultanate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandu.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
 * 

Kurmi
If you see that kind of edit on "Awadhiya" next time, kindly revert it. Obviously a sock of Prakash Baghel Raj. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 07:48, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Ok...i will.Heba Aisha (talk) 07:52, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Hindi sources
I've reverted your edits at Seema Samridhi and restored all the sources you had removed with the edit summary that these sources are in Hindi and add nothing. It would've been better to raise the issue on article's talk page. Hindi sources are as much reliable as those in English. Regards. ─ The Aafī (talk) 12:59, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

2020 Hathras gang rape and murder Twitter Sources
Hi Heba, I saw that you removed the twitter citations from the article saying "Twitter shouldnt be used....need a reliable source". I added those citations, they are reliable because all 3 of them were from official Twitter accounts of Agra Police, IPRD and District Magistrate. I read WP:TWITTER and the citations all match the criteria in there, so I think they should be kept up. Also, the replaced citation of the news article doesn't show these tweets mentioned. I'm relatively new to Wikipedia, so please do point the right way :)

Here's the link to the diff : https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2020_Hathras_gang_rape_and_murder&diff=981436494&oldid=981436311&diffmode=source

- Subins2000 (talk) 15:47, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * hi its ok. It was not necessary though. As i have added news source.see.Heba Aisha (talk) 18:34, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you. That news article doesn't show these official tweets though. These additional tweets would make the citation stronger. I shall add it once again Subins2000 (talk) 22:36, 2 October 2020 (UTC)


 * Go ahead best of luck.Heba Aisha (talk) 22:37, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mallaah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vaishali.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:57, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
 * Kushwaha
 * added links pointing to Rohtas and Bhojpur
 * Vritra
 * added a link pointing to Danava

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 13 October 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 20
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Satyadev Kushwaha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bokaro.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:10, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

October 2020
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Seema Samridhi, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. If you would like to experiment with page titles and moving, please use the test Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ─ The Aafī (talk) 08:38, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Help me
I have been trying to make changes in Udal of Mahoba, Alha and Banaphar since few days, but obviously English administrators cannot understand Hindi language, that's why I need help of any administrator who understands hindi language. So can you please help me. If you can than please see my reliable sources for making changes in Talk:Udal of Mahoba Sumit banaphar (talk) 12:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
 * In case sources are reliable and are in hindi there is rule to give translation of it in quote.Then it will be accepted. Heba Aisha (talk) 13:16, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

I meant to say that, can you check the sources i provide in Talk:Udal of Mahoba.If you are interested or not busy.Sumit banaphar (talk) 16:17, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

Vaani publishers.....it will be difficult for english wikipedia to accept this source. Because many users in past tried to expand some articles with such sources but were reverted by the senior editors.Heba Aisha (talk) 17:04, 3 November 2020 (UTC)

I just want your opinions about what the source are saying which i provide to make changes in Talk:Udal of MahobaSumit banaphar (talk) 08:36, 5 November 2020 (UTC)

Happy Diwali!

 * 🪔Never expected this on wikipedia thank u Mr. and same to u.🪔Heba Aisha (talk) 09:11, 14 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Why not? We celebrate everything. Welcome . - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:14, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Happy Diwali
.🪔 HappyDeepawali🪔 May this festival bring peace and blessings to you and your family •  .💠 245CMR💠 . •👥📜 10:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Thanks 👍👍Heba Aisha (talk) 11:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Shakuni Choudhury, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lakhanpur.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

New message from Swadge2
Swadge2 (talk) 10:19, 18 November 2020 (UTC)

ChariotRider55
Hi Heba, Hi, maybe we could rephrase some of 's edits but it seems that at least some of the edits are necessary as the modern opinions apply to *all* Rajput clans. They do not say that there are any exceptions. Many of the western scholars (other than origin section, please see the community formation section on the Rajput page) - are quite explicit in saying that they do not have Kshatriya origin and these lineages were fabricated by Bards as well as the Rajputs themselves. I found two more references from Oxford University Press. But these were not always fabricated by Brahmins. I have seen this promotion issue on Maratha pages too. Since the main Maratha page is under heavy scrutiny, several caste promoters try to add words like Suryavamshi, Kshatriya origin etc. directly to the clan subpages rather than the main page as not many people watch them. I feel that at least something should be added when there is a statement that a certain clan is or claims Suryavanshi etc. and then point the page to origin on the Rajput page. At least one or two lines that modern historians do not agree in general about all Rajput clans. What do you think? I felt like his edits were valid although probably too much detail. In short, unless there is historical evidence that a caste studied vedas at least in the 18th/19th century - it is unlikely that it is twice born irrespective of what they claim. LukeEmily (talk) 16:04, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Ok...as u added those details..... You are more knowledgeable in the area. So I asked u.Go aheadHeba Aisha (talk) 16:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Daroga is not part of Rajput community you idiot Luke Emily. Rajputs are the kshatriya as far as Vedic ritual is concerned. The word is synonymous to Kshatriya. This is not based on some bards, Charans as you fool think to be. Rana of Bharat (talk) 07:47, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

My friend Luke Emily, your questions on Sacred thread and dwija, yes Rajputs used to recite Vedas and wear sacred thread. https://books.google.co.in/books?id=0fmtjbaQPzMC&pg=PA64&dq=rajputs+rulers+vedas+reciting&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiV6LDylpPtAhV-yTgGHYdMDIoQuwUwAXoECAYQBw#v=onepage&q=rajputs%20rulers%20vedas%20reciting&f=false Rana of Bharat (talk) 08:12, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Ms Heba, when you have lack of knowledge on the subject don't try to be the editor on it. Today anybody is entitled to do what they want like farming, business etc. Do you a large section of brahmin is in agriculture and not very literate ( if you use English educational logic). Rana of Bharat (talk) 11:11, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Discussion on a page
In the page Rajputization, you have added Daroga, Noniya, Rajgond etc these are not part of the community. They are separate community pls correct it. Ritual imitation doesn't mean a community becomes as such. Rana of Bharat (talk) 06:56, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
 * we rely on sources while editing not the personal opinion.Oxford source clearly mention it.Heba Aisha (talk) 09:21, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

, please familiariase yourself with Wikipedia's reliable source policy. Any well-sourced content will not be deleted. You can only contest it by bringing sources of equal or better quality.

You do not have to respond to this message, since you are under a topic ban. But you can utilise your off-time better by learning about Wikipedia policies. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 20:55, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Irrelevant image added in Bihari Rajput
How is the image being added by you on Bihari Rajput is relevant to the topic? Is that image verifiable with citation to prove it, explain. Anony20 (talk) 05:00, 28 November 2020 (UTC)Anony20

Please avoid editorial warring
Hello, please comply with wikipedia policy on edit war and refrain from editing the article jadeja without detailed references. Please add precise quotes from the reference material on the talk page to build consensus about the material and then add it into the article. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing edits, once it is known that there is a disagreement. If you engage in repeated warring you may be blocked from editing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OnlyTruthShallPrevail (talk • contribs) 17:55, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Don't blank sourced content on articles Heba Aisha (talk) 18:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)

Heba good to see your are so regular but please be more informative
You added bhumihars to shudra who were always considered high caste even brahmin. I am a kshtriya kushwaha Anirudh Kumar Paswan (talk) 07:43, 30 November 2020 (UTC)
 * We realized...as and others have discussed it at the talk page of chariotrider.Heba Aisha (talk) 14:58, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Please stop deletion
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates, or image from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Bihari Rajput, you may be blocked from editing. Anony20 (talk) 07:49, 1 December 2020 (UTC)
 * First of all its violation of policy.As you urself said in WP:AE that it represent kunwar singh and his attendants and shouldn't be put on top of caste articles. And you have directly put level 3 warning. Heba Aisha (talk) 11:39, 1 December 2020 (UTC)

You have marked the media as a duplicate and for speedy deletion, when it's obvious from the caption of your upload that it's an engraving of a photograph(One uploaded by me). Stop personal attack and Revenge Anony20 (talk) 12:27, 1 December 2020 (UTC)