User talk:Admiinship is no big deal

My concern about your username (Admiinship is no big deal)
Hello, Admiinship is no big deal, and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia!

I hope not to seem unfriendly or make you feel unwelcome, but I noticed your username, and am concerned that it might not meet Wikipedia's username policy. After you look over that policy, could we discuss that concern here?

I'd appreciate learning your own views, for instance your reasons for wanting this particular name, and what alternative username you might accept that avoids raising this concern.

You have several options freely available to you:
 * If you can relieve my concern through discussing it here, I can stop worrying about it.
 * If the two of us can't agree here, we can ask for help through Wikipedia's dispute resolution process, such as asking for a "third opinion", or requesting comments from other Wikipedians. Admins usually abide by agreements reached through this process.
 * You can keep your contributions history under a new username. Visit Changing username and follow the guidelines there.

Let me reassure you that my writing here means I don't think your username is grossly, blatantly, or obviously inappropriate; such names get reported straight to Administrator intervention against vandalism (WP:AIV), or blocked on sight. This is more a case where opinions might differ, and it would be good to reach some consensus — either here or at WP:RFC/NAME. So I look forward to a friendly discussion, and to enjoying your continued participation on Wikipedia. Thank you again!  Te ll y a ddi ct  11:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)  Te ll y  a ddi ct  11:58, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Well I think it would be best as they are not supposed to contain the word Wikipedia or any other Wikmedia Foundaton as it says in WP:USERNAME, also your username leads to the actual page about adminship not being a big deal, could you direct it to your actual userpage. To request a name change list it at WP:CHU and a b'crat will do it soon for you. Happy editing!  Te ll y a ddi ct  12:03, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Blocking
Please don't add "blocked" messages to user talk pages unless you have blocked the user in question. You recently added such a template to User talk:Liamsmyth but the user hadn't been blocked at that stage.-- Waggers 12:05, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely for trolling. Viridae Talk 12:11, 4 April 2007 (UTC)


 * You are highly unlikely to be unblocked without explaining your edits and making some very positive noises about your future behaviour.  Dei z  talk 12:34, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

Protected
I've protected this page for 24 hours. If you're serious about contributing, calm down and give us some very good, thought out reasons to unblock you at that time -- in particular, what areas of Wikipedia would you like to contribute to? – Luna Santin  (talk) 19:46, 4 April 2007 (UTC)