User talk:AdmiralAlex

MFD
Following this Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User talk:AdmiralAlex discussion, your usertalk page has been deleted. You are welcome to use your user talk page going forward for communicating about the encyclopedia we are here to build. If you would like a copy of the information that was on the page prior to deletion, please enable your wiki email leave me a talk message and I will send it to you. — xaosflux  Talk 03:52, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Your old page information has been exported and the link sent to you, please retrieve as soon as possible. If you need anything else, please contact me on my talk page. —  xaosflux  Talk 03:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I've added an XML output of all the templates along with your page, it is quite technical, but has the complete code if you want to reference it. — xaosflux  Talk 00:51, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I've added an XML output of all the templates along with your page, it is quite technical, but has the complete code if you want to reference it. — xaosflux  Talk 00:51, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Repost of User:AdmiralAlex
A tag has been placed on requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia, because it appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion  tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 07:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

Please stop
Wikipedia is not for what you are trying to do - see WP:NOTWEBHOST: "'Wikipedians have their own user pages, but they should be used primarily to present information relevant to working on the encyclopedia. Limited biographical information is allowed, but user pages should not function as personal webpages or be repositories for large amounts of material that is irrelevant to collaborating on Wikipedia. If you are looking to make a personal webpage or blog or to post your résumé, please make use of one of the many free providers on the Internet or any hosting included with your Internet account.'" Have a look at Wikia, which runs on the same MediaWiki software as Wikipedia, but is much more open-minded about what sort of content is allowed. You may well find a suitable Wiki there, or you could even set up your own. Templates from here may not work directly, but could probably be imported there - you could ask advice at their help page. JohnCD (talk) 09:31, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

FamilyWiki

Speedy deletion nomination of FamilyWiki


A tag has been placed on FamilyWiki requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  22:49, 27 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Age tracker


A tag has been placed on Age tracker requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  GILO  A& E&uArr;  22:12, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. Esquivalience t 22:47, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

User:AdmiralAlex/sandbox
I see that you have yet again recreated the page which was deleted as per this Mfd. You have been told repeatedly that this material is not appropriate for Wikipedia. Unless you delete the content of this sandbox within the next few days I intend to raise this issue at WP:ANI. DerbyCountyinNZ (Talk Contribs) 22:53, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

This is why we can't have nice things in life, because people like you and the government want to interfere unnecessarily with people's lives, and it does not belong there. You need to mind your own business and Wikipedia needs to stop being so restrictive and acting like North Korea - Admiral Alex

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
 * Do not re-post this content on Wikipedia. While occasionally editors are given latitude with disclosure of their own personal information, disclosing PII on large numbers of other people (especially minors) is not permitted. Re-posting this content again will result in loss of editing privileges. L Faraone  05:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Why have you chosen to disregard the above, very clear, advice? DerbyCountyinNZ  (Talk Contribs) 21:09, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeatedly posting content that has been previously suppressed for containing non-public or personally identifiable information. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. L Faraone  05:34, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Queen's reign
You keep claiming it's an error but it isn't. As Victoria died in the early evening of her final day, and William IV and George VI died in the middle of the night, the Queen will surpass the length of Victoria's reign at some point after 8:30 p.m. on the 9th. Although, it could be the early hours of the 10th, the sources specifically say that on the balance of probabilities, it is more likely to be the 9th because for it to be the 10th George VI would have to have died after 5:30 a.m., but he is thought to have died in the night earlier than that. DrKiernan (talk) 16:19, 4 July 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, I did not realize that. -Admiral Alex