User talk:AdmiralTyler

March 2015
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Captain America: The Winter Soldier has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Captain America: The Winter Soldier was changed by AdmiralTyler (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.887068 on 2015-03-07T18:47:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:47, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove information from articles, as you did to Captain America: The Winter Soldier. Wikipedia is not censored, and content is not removed on the sole grounds of perceived offensiveness. Please discuss this issue on the article's talk page to reach consensus rather than continuing to remove the disputed material. If the content in question involves images, you also have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide the images that you may find offensive. Thank you. - McMatter (talk)/(contrib) 18:52, 7 March 2015 (UTC)

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Avengers: Age of Ultron, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Nick—Contact/Contribs 20:46, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article, such as you did to Avengers: Age of Ultron, will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Weegeerunner (talk) 20:53, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I'm NickW557. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Avengers: Age of Ultron— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nick—Contact/Contribs 20:54, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Just from quite a few of your recent edits I've noticed that you like to sensor explicit words on Wikipedia. I'm just wondering why even though you have been threatened with being blocked if you continue.-- Ditto51 ( My Talk Page ) 22:40, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

June 2015
Hello, I'm Weegeerunner. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Suicide Squad (film) without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Weegeerunner chat it up 21:21, 25 June 2015 (UTC)

August 2015
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. &mdash; MusikAnimal  talk  21:37, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

Batman v Superman
Your recent editing history at Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  18:22, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Please read WP:FILMMARKETING. It clearly states that Marketing sections are not just used to simply identify that something exists (e.g., They contracted with Mattel to make toys). We're supposed to use reliable sources to elaborate on how that has or could impact the film. Trailers only get discussed when there are reliable sources discussing them. I haven't checked the other pages, but just because other pages do it doesn't mean that it's appropriate. You have also violated the three revert rule, by reverting at least 6 times. If you do it again, you will be reported.    BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  20:04, 25 August 2015 (UTC)