User talk:Admiral Norton/Archive 3

Rhyolite
Thank you very much for reviewing the article and for your kind words. It was a nice surprise to read that particular note on my talk page. I responded a bit more fully at the bottom of the GA review, but I wanted to post a note here too. Finetooth (talk) 22:46, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost &mdash; 2 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 9, which includes these articles:


 * Books extension enabled
 * News and notes: Stewards, Wikimania bids, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikipedia's role in journalism, Smarter Wikipedia, Skittles
 * Dispatches: WikiProject Ships Featured topic and Good topics
 * Wikiproject report: WikiProject Norse History and Culture
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 07:48, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Shoot 'em up GA
I've tried to address the issues, if you want to take another look. bridies (talk) 08:37, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * More added. bridies (talk) 19:23, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks :) bridies (talk) 18:20, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Hi
Hi, my name is EsperimentoPierrot. I'm here to ask you why you decided that people like Emilio Ambrosini or Niccolò Fiorentino have to be considered croat people. I don't want an edit war and I have very little interest in editing more times those articles, so I'm writing to you just to know your reasons. If you like to answer you can find my page in the italian wikipedia Hoping to read you soon --EsperimentoPierrot (talk) 11:03, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

You got me there
lol, indeed. thanks for that catch. I could have probably looked at that page a thousand times and never noticed. :) Protonk (talk) 23:14, 4 March 2009 (UTC)

Jadranska Avenue
Evo, ovo sam našao File:Bridge over Sava-Odra Channel Zagreb.jpg i File:Jadranska Avenue Zagreb.jpg, imam još jednu od čvora Lučko, ali se vidi kotač od aviona, pa je nisam stavljao.--Ex13 (talk) 23:00, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Panoramski let iznad Zagreba :) Fantastično je i preporučam, ako se ne bojiš visine :) --Ex13 (talk) 18:27, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Da, baš gledam. Čestitam. I sretnooo :) --Ex13 (talk) 18:30, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

RfA
A consensus has been reached by your peers that you should be an admin. I have made it so. Please review Administrators' reading list and keep up the great work. Sincerely, Kingturtle (talk) 16:38, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Congratulations, Admiral. I knew you could do it. Remember your criticism from your RFA, learn from your mistakes, and ignore the rules when you have to. Cheers,  bibliomaniac 1  5  18:43, 7 March 2009 (UTC)

Talk:Dragon kill points/GA1
I think that I've made some of the necessary changes to that article. Drop by the GA review and let me know if I've missed anything (or perhaps created new problems!). Congratulations on your RfA, by the way. Protonk (talk) 02:25, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Talk:$pringfield/GA1
Thanks for reviewing. I have made some changes to the article now so please take another look. :) The Le ft orium  19:04, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Hey there
I edited recently Zagreb article and improven I would be happy to know what you think of the new article Zagreb ?NIR-Warrior (talk) 20:49, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Albion Nation
Recognised geographical locations are considered notable; villages, hamlets et all. Me declaring my room to be the Nation of Smelly Students does not qualify it for a Wikipedia article. Ironholds (talk) 20:53, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you mate, I would be happy to join you, only I need to know how to do thatNIR-Warrior (talk) 21:06, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Done
Im a member now, Search for more users for joining us NIR-Warrior (talk) 22:03, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stalin's War
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Stalin's War, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No evidence of notability - as the AFD'd Band's article says it was limited release from 'a small local label'

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Porturology (talk) 23:16, 8 March 2009 (UTC) I have no doubt this will be contested Porturology (talk) 23:16, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Yes I was being a bit frivolous Porturology (talk) 23:21, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Operation Deny Flight
Hi, You left some comments on the Operation Deny Flight FAC last week, and I notice you've made several edits to the article as well. The FAC seems to have stagnated since then, and I was wondering if you have any other issues that you think need to be resolved with the article or if you're ready to support it now. Thanks. Cool3 (talk) 15:50, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks! I hope I've now dealt with the issues you brought up, and thanks again for your help on the article. Cool3 (talk) 02:17, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia Signpost &mdash; 9 March 2009
This week, the Wikipedia Signpost published volume 5, issue 10, which includes these articles:


 * News and notes: Commons, conferences, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Politics, more politics, and more
 * Dispatches: 100 Featured sounds milestone
 * Wikiproject report: WikiProject Christianity
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  at 22:35, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Anything else
Any work to do on Zagreb article, I need to see it evolve into a featured article and there is much vandals here; anything to improve or to add on Zagreb article ? NIR-Warrior (talk) 22:42, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Copy that
Im working on it, thanks.NIR-Warrior (talk) 23:07, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Zagreb need what exactly to evolve ?
I fixed broken links, corrected grammar even if there is not such of wrong spelling as I saw. Is adding new sections will help the article to evolve into a featured one ? What exactly we need to add to the article to see it evolve soon ?NIR-Warrior (talk) 23:55, 9 March 2009 (UTC)

Subtropical cyclone article
There are portions of the world (Australia, Japan, Hong Kong, and Mexico) which use km/h units, so I'm not going to remove them from the article. All the other suggestions you made during the GA review have been made. Thegreatdr (talk) 23:24, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Done
No more of needed citations, I've provided all the citations in the article, corrected all grammar errors and wrong sentences, fixed links and organized all the aricle with a new design and a great look; I do not know what we need again ?, how can I request to move the article into a featured one ? NIR-Warrior (talk) 07:46, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

RFC
All users involved in personal union discussion are invited to RFC on Talk:Pacta conventa (Croatia)--Rjecina (talk) 16:14, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Brachistrone
While I don't disagree with your merge result, the uesr was obviously attempting for people to supply him with an answer to his homework, which is against homework. I'm going to give him a warning, ok? Thanks. Cheers, Im per a t § r (Talk) 16:51, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, the template is only for the Help desk and the reference desks, but the policy is a general Wikipedia consensus. However, I do agree wit your redirect decision. :) Cheers. Im per a t <font color=#4682B4>§ r (Talk) 21:12, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * As a side not, your RfA was successful- might want to replace the notice on your userpage with :) Cheers. <font color=#4169E1">Im <font color=#7B68EE>per <font color=#6495ED>a <font color=#87CEFA>t <font color=#4682B4>§ r (Talk) 21:14, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem; your dedication to the wikipedia is admirable :P Cheers. <font color=#4169E1">Im <font color=#7B68EE>per <font color=#6495ED>a <font color=#87CEFA>t <font color=#4682B4>§ r (Talk) 21:27, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Lights and Sounds
Thank you for taking the time in reviewing the article, it is most appreciated. :) --  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 23:50, 13 March 2009 (UTC)

Teitur Thordarson
This is the English Wikipedia not the Icelanding Wikipedia. The article should use characters common to English and alternate spellings may be displayed. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:22, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * The issue was decided when the page using Icelandic character was made a forwarding page to the one with the Western characters. Feel free to argue with the admins not me. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 18:32, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Once again you're arguing with me. Who cares what the FA does, they're not Wikipedia. Take your issue up with Wikipedisa's admins and not me. Thanks for your understanding. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:20, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I've argued with myself over many Wikipedia edits. Thanks for all your hard work. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 23:30, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

<h2 style="display:none;">Wikipedia Signpost — 16 March 2009 <div style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; border-bottom:1px solid #AAA; padding-bottom:2px; margin-bottom:10px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;"> Unsubscribe &middot; Single-page &middot; Full edition &raquo;  — 16 March 2009


 * News and notes: License update, Commons cartoons, films milestone, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Manufactured scandal, Wikipedia assignments, and more
 * Dispatches: New FAC and FAR appointments
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Delivered by §hepBot  ( Disable )  at 21:53, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

A strange translation request
Hello! I was wondering if you would possibly translate the article on Marko Vego and the related info from Humačka ploča in the Bosnian wikipedia? I was thinking about translating them into Finnish and Swedish from the English articles, but the first one doesn't have an article at all and the second one is rather skimpy on detail. Thanks if you'll help! -Yupik (talk) 16:00, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Eh, you're much faster than I am :D The Croatian wiki also seems to have a substantial amount of info on the tablet. Not sure though how much of it is actually useful. Again, thanks (and no hurries)! :) -Yupik (talk) 16:07, 17 March 2009 (UTC)

Hagar Qim
I'm not sure how the 'keep' process works, but thank you for marking this important and basically unique image as worthy of being kept! ja fiswa imċappas bil-hara! (talk) 16:05, 18 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Well you're not getting paid (are you??) so a little appreciation was in order. ja fiswa imċappas bil-hara! (talk) 16:10, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Response
Hi, I responded to your comment on my user talk page. Ricardiana (talk) 16:53, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#A_CSD
Re Administrators'_noticeboard / Yung skillett. I removed the speedy tag, but in researching it looks like a hoax to me. :( -- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  19:38, 18 March 2009 (UTC)

Wp:AVIATION banner.
It should be fixed now. An editor tried to convert Template:WPBannerMeta/hooks/collapsed to a navFrame this morning, which doesn't work in that case. - Trevor MacInnis (Contribs) 03:29, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Sorry
I was reverting unsourced POV changes (and since I was already there, adding some more data) in Croatia article. So you need check the article again. Sorry again. --Kebeta (talk) 19:17, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

OK. --Kebeta (talk) 20:29, 19 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I will ask for help if necessary. Just keep up with the good job you already do. Regards. --Kebeta (talk) 21:03, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:Zapresic
Sorry, but I don't have the time to do a full-scale review. In addition, I only review at FAC for technical stuff like Dabs, dead links, and ref formatting.--Best,  ₮  RU  C  Ө   01:00, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

NATO
Because of my poor english administrator Future Perfect is demanding that I ask somebody to look my edits. users Kubura and DIREKTOR are out of picture, this is not controversial edit, you are translator from Croatian on English and so .... I have been writing about prime minister moment of truth ?!

Can you please check this and edit my grammar mistakes ?--Rjecina (talk) 12:35, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks.
 * I have been reading newspaper and not believing this statement !!!--Rjecina (talk) 12:56, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

bmibaby or BMIBaby?
You have previously participated in a discussion at Talk:Bmibaby. If you care, please weigh in again at Talk:Bmibaby. —  AjaxSmack   19:02, 21 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Juraj I Šubić Bribirski
Hi, I was out of town for a while, so I wasn't able to respond you. There is no mistake in article about Juraj I Šubić, maybe its just lousy written. What I meant was that Pavao I Šubić Bribirski appointed his brothers as commissars of Dalmatian cities. He (Pavao I) gave Split to his brother Mladen I, and Šibenik, Nin, Trogir and Omiš to his brother Juraj I Šubić. BTW, Pavao was the most powerful Croatian noble.....not Juraj I. I don't know is that what you wanted to know? Regards. --Kebeta (talk) 17:21, 22 March 2009 (UTC) == Wikipedia Signpost <span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: 23 March 2009 ==


 * From the editor: Reviewing books for the Signpost
 * Special report: Abuse Filter is enabled
 * News and notes: Flaggedrevs, copyright project, fundraising reports, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Alternatives, IWF threats, and more
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 03:38, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

Abuse of Tools and Blocking
Hello, I know that Several people have been abusing their tools to ban me even from writing on my own talk page. My discussion comments on the Obama page are deleted speedily and I know that they are trying to get me to reinstate them so that they can ban me again. The most notable is a person named Tarc. Can you please take a look at what happened to me (especially the last block that stopped me from writing on my own talk page) and advise me on what to do next. I understand you may disagree with me but I think what is happening to me is abuse and I hope that is stopped and the responsible parties held to some accountability and monitoring as i doubt I am the only one. I will try to be extra careful in the future but despite my not being the most potentially sympathetic character (to those on the Left) I don't think that is any excuse for the afore mentioned abuse of power. Thank you. JohnHistory (talk) 20:37, 29 March 2009 (UTC)JohnHistory

P.S. I couldn't even contest my block because Tarc blocked me from writing on my own page for writing on my own page. That has to be abuse, right? JohnHistory (talk) 21:00, 29 March 2009 (UTC)JohnHistory

== Wikipedia Signpost <span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: 30 March 2009 ==


 * From the editor: Follow the Signpost with RSS and Twitter
 * Special report: Community weighs license update
 * News and notes: End of Encarta, flagged revisions poll, new image donation, and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Censorship, social media in schools, and more
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 19:40, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar!
In addition, you may use the userbox located at User:Drilnoth/Userboxes/GAN backlog elimination drive to indicate your participation on your user page. Thanks! –Drilnoth (T • C) 21:25, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

HI
HIFireFoxUser2343 (talk) 17:59, 3 April 2009 (UTC)

Filter 133
The filter was still broken, evaluating new_HTML for a very long page caused a long wait on the edit, and during high load times, or for non-autoconfirmed users (who have lots of other filters run on them that autoconfirmed users don't) this would cause the edit to time out. Please do not reenable broken filters if you don't change anything. That is why I disabled it in the first place. Prodego <sup style="color:darkgreen;">talk  16:12, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * If you don't understand why something is disabled, don't reenable it. Prodego  <sup style="color:darkgreen;">talk  18:12, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * However many many other filters do, so the load for a non-autoconfirmed user is much higher, in total, than someone logged in. Prodego  <sup style="color:darkgreen;">talk  18:30, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The best way to test the filters as a whole, is to log out, and then try to subst a large page in to the article space. This is pretty much the worse case, every parameter being checked is very large (with the exception of old_wikitext, if you want to go worst case, replace an already substed large article by substing a new article). Also, mind the time of day. Right now the server load is moderate, when you (and then me later) tested, the server load was nearing its daily low. In a few hours it will be at max. Prodego  <sup style="color:darkgreen;">talk  18:45, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

Poland-Uruguay relations
Yes, it's a really shame about the FAC. Someone else has been working on copyediting the article, though, and it's currently going through a MILHIST A-Class Review (here if you'd like to participate), so I foresee it's return to FAC in perhaps a month or two. Thanks for the offer of userification on the Poland-Uruguay article, but I don't really think I could do much with the article. I tried my best to find the sources for it, but the consensus does seem to demonstrate that more was needed, and I don't think there's much more out there. Cool3 (talk) 20:26, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

== Wikipedia Signpost <span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: 6 April 2009 ==
 * There's no way consensus was still delete after Cool3 unearthed sources - although it was "no consensus" given the handful of accounts hellbent on the deletion of all bilateral relation articles regardless of content. Please reconsider the close, or let me know that you won't so I can open a DRV. Cheers, Wily D  19:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Special report: Interactive OpenStreetMap features in development
 * News and notes: Statistics, Wikipedia research and more
 * Wikipedia in the news: Wikia Search abandoned, university plagiarism, and more
 * Dispatches: New FAC and FAR nomination process
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject China
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 18:37, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Deletion review for Poland–Uruguay relations
An editor has asked for a deletion review of Poland–Uruguay relations. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedy-deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Wily D 12:30, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I'd be fine with that. Sorry if I came off as rude, but the whole atmosphere around these articles is just so charged these days, merely being ignored would probably be the nicest treatment I've received in days. ;) Wily D  13:01, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I think you'd have been fine to close the DRV yourself, since I agreed and no one else had commented, but I've gone ahead and done it. And yes, I would guess every last bilateral relations article, from Micronesia-San Marino up to United Kingdom - United States is going to see an AFD sometime soon.  It'd be nice to have time to improve them, as most are just stubs, but with being rapidfired across AFD, and using disruptive tactics link mass bundlings that make discussions impossible, I simply don't have the time right now.
 * No worries about the delay, I really didn't think much of it. I'm just going by the letter of the book since I know at least two of the accounts pushing for deletion have been looking to get me blocked/banned, and I'd rather not make a misstep they can pounce on. Wily D  13:58, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

Re: release date for Lapitch
No matter how hard I've searched, I've had no luck getting an exact cinema release date for Lapitch the Little Shoemaker in its native Croatia. Since you're from Zagreb, can you please provide me that date? (I'm considering a GA nod for this sometime soon.) --Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 08:28, 8 April 2009 (UTC)

A-Class review question
I am leaving you this message to ask you to return to WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Operation Deny Flight and re-evaluate your support for this article since you did not use the proper criteria. Namely since you mentioned WP:A? instead of the MILHIST A-Class criteria put forth here: WP:MH/A?. Thanks, -MBK004 22:08, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Svilaj"
A page you created, Svilaj, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Thrane (talk) 15:00, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Category renaming
I see that you recently redirected a variety of categories relating to counties in Croatia, such as Category:Dubrovnik-Neretva County. You should note that just redirecting a category does not change the category links on articles that belong to that category, so you've actually made it more difficult for readers to find these articles. If you want to rename a category, you should list it at WP:Categories for discussion. These particular renamings look like they should satisfy the "speedy renaming" criteria. Following this process will trigger a bot to change all the category links on the pages that belong to the renamed categories. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. --R'n'B (call me Russ) 10:23, 13 April 2009 (UTC) == Wikipedia Signpost <span style="color:#666; font-variant: small-caps; font-size:80%; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">: 13 April 2009 ==


 * License update: Licensing vote begins
 * News and notes: WMF petitions Obama, longer AFDs, UK meeting, and more
 * Dispatches: Let's get serious about plagiarism
 * WikiProject report: WikiProject Color
 * Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
 * Features and admins: Approved this week
 * Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
 * Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation

<div style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 15:52, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Kind Request for Assistance
Dear Admiral Norton,

I received your message informing me that some of the pictures I uploaded are going to be deleted. The message you sent me is pasted below. The reason I put the copyright tag that I did was because of the following reasons;

(The quotes are all from Wikipedia text) "The public domain is generally defined (e.g. by the U.S. Copyright Office) as the sum of works that are not copyrighted, i.e. ·that were not eligible for copyright in the first place, or ·whose copyright has expired." I think HTV television screenshots were never eligible for copyright since I was told that there are no clear intellectual ownership rights laws in Croatia. "Whether or not something is copyright-free in some country depends on the laws of individual countries." Seeing as Croatia is not part of the EU yet, what laws apply?

If I am wrong, would you please advise me what copyright tag to place these pictures under so they are not deleted? The television show in question is no longer even in existence, and these photos add to the person's notability. Should it be under a Non-free fair use tag? If so, which one and then how do I insert the rationale?

Thank you so much in advance for your assistance. Turqoise127 (talk) 18:25, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

I have listed a number of files you uploaded as possibly unfree at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2009 April 11#File:ZP show intro.jpg, because they use the tag but obviously aren't in public domain. This tag is meant for use in files that have been released in public domain by SFR Yugoslavia; it does not imply that every publicly available multimedia material is inherently in public domain and for use in Wikipedia. —Admiral Norton (talk) 22:28, 11 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikiproject NATO
As you may have noticed, the proposal for WikiProject NATO has now attracted 4 participants. That's one short of the suggested 5, but it's close enough, right? In any case, I have now established the most rudimentary of wikiproject pages, WikiProject NATO, and I'd like to invite you to come and officially join as well as helping to get the project rolling. At a bare minimum, we're going to need to design a template and start tagging some articles. I look forward to seeing you around the project! Cool3 (talk) 20:22, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Good to have you on board! Cool3 (talk) 20:30, 15 April 2009 (UTC)