User talk:Admiralthrawn 1

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -Phoenixrod 05:06, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

iTunes
Your recent contribution(s) to are very much appreciated. However, you did not provide references or sources for your information. Keeping Wikipedia accurate and verifiable is very important, and as you might be aware there is currently a drive to improve the quality of Wikipedia by encouraging editors to cite the sources they used when adding content. If sources are left unreferenced, it may count as original research, which is not allowed. Can you provide in the article specific references to any books, articles, websites or other reliable sources that will allow people to verify the content in the article? You can use a citation method listed at inline citations that best suits each article. Thanks! --HereToHelp 03:44, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

I guessed it was you
I read your little profane comment on my userpage, and I'm leaving it there - to spite you. I was reading: Admiralthrawn... where have I heard that name, and along with the phallic joke on my page and your talk on iTunes, I found it was the burrito-eating (not saving for me) Zach. You should help me with a project I'm working on - Grocer's Encyclopedia, its a bunch of food related words in a encyc from the 1910s, pretty cool stuff. Let me know if you need help with it.

Make sure you sign your name on posts in user page or discussion
Sign with ~ -- Onionmon 17:03, 5 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Garrison_keillor.jpg
Except now it's been resolved, because I'm awesome.

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Group shot splash.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Group shot splash.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:28, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

thanks robot, I really don't care, especially since I uploaded that image almost a year ago. Admiralthrawn 1 (talk) 08:54, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:CAN conference nov2003.jpg
Which license author permitted to be used in Wikipedia? GFDL-author, cc-by-sa-3.0 or PD-author ? Carlosguitar 10:35, 14 November 2007 (UTC)
 * It was the original photographer, Charles Jenks. He's a colleague and fellow activist, and he gave me permission to use his work on Wikipedia. I've already emailed Wikipedia Permissions with his email allowing use of his photos, provided that they have the (c) Charles Jenks on them.


 * Is that acceptable?

Admiralthrawn 1 (talk) 08:53, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
 * The image should be allow for commercial and derivate works. If author agreed, please place or  . Thus image will be attributed to original author.
 * It is not acceptable non-commercial or non-derivate images of alive people and places on Wikipedia. Cheers. Carlosguitar (talk) 13:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Biddy martin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Biddy martin.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 18:09, 22 December 2010 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:Can conference 2007.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  23:39, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * , you have this range checkuser blocked. It seems to be at least partially a residential ISP now, see for example . Can you have a look, and see if we can try unblocking it? ST47 (talk) 23:13, 6 December 2019 (UTC)
 * It still has colocation hosting and a long term abuser was quashed from this range which was effective. Since it looks like this editor is indeed local to that area, I will issue a six month IP block exemption. The block will expire before the IPBE does. Better to handle these on a case-by-case basis.

IP block exempt
I have granted your account an exemption from IP blocking for six months. This will allow you to edit the English Wikipedia through full blocks affecting your IP address when you are logged in.

Please read the page IP block exemption carefully, especially the section on IP block exemption conditions. Inappropriate usage of this user right may result in revocation. I hope this will enhance your editing, and allow you to edit successfully and without disruption. — Berean Hunter   (talk)  23:39, 6 December 2019 (UTC)