User talk:Adnannurani98/sandbox

What does the article (or section) do well? A: It is good to mention the significance in the very beginning. As I would imagine this is a new article and it is good to inform readers the importance before this topic become popular. Nice layout of ideas that you have not have time to impelement yet.

What changes would you suggest overall? A: Please remember to capitalize the first character of each word for the titles In the heading, I would suggest that make each title to another section, instead of having them all nested below "CRISPR as a diagnostic tool"

What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? A: I think there are many terminologies, especially on the titles. I wonder if you can translate them into words that deliver the same meaning but easier to understand?

What does the article (or section) do well? - Very detailed What changes would you suggest overall? - Background and significance should focus on the how and what CRISPR does and use examples afterwards to further support. - As a medical related page, things like “Cas,” specific DNA process, etc. need to be - A lot of what’s written seems like shorthand notes and not written out in article form. Going back and rewriting and organizing can help with clarity. What is the most important thing that the author could do to improve his/her contribution? - Edit for clarity and write for a less knowledgeable audience. Lots of people who are not technically fluent are interested in CRISPR and it’s applications. CatherineRey19 (talk) 21:20, 17 October 2019 (UTC)