User talk:Adolph Verloc

Possible COIs
Hello, Adolph Verloc. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Geoffrey Cox (British politician), you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. The suspected COI also concerns edits to articles Torridge and West Devon (UK Parliament constituency) and 2019 British prorogation controversy. If you wish to declare a COI (a personal or professional connection with the portrayed person or topic of an article), please consider using this template: Template:UserboxCOI – or simply present your conflict of interest on your user page. You may also describe it in the edit summary when doing edits or in the Talk page attached to each article. Please see the Wikipedia COI standard mentioned above. --Sasper (talk) 01:42, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Hello Adolph Verloc. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Adolph Verloc. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. SmartSE (talk) 22:19, 6 January 2020 (UTC)


 * Given that Cox's employees appear to have been editing the article in his favour over many years (Special:Contributions/Beulah1506, Special:Contributions/Urthe14me, Special:Contributions/Mfs1011), I would suggest that this might be the time to stop. SmartSE (talk) 22:22, 6 January 2020 (UTC)

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Adolph Verloc, and the template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. SmartSE (talk) 13:05, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

February 2020
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Failing to disclose your conflict of interest. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. SmartSE (talk) 12:47, 28 February 2020 (UTC)