User talk:Adon Lunar

December 2020
Hello, I'm Peaceray. I noticed that you recently removed content from Cagot without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page.   Peaceray (talk) 16:54, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mandodari, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Peaceray (talk) 16:56, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Adon Lunar


Please do not create hoaxes on Wikipedia, as you did at User:Adon Lunar. Doing so is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ahmetlii (talk) 11:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (your reason here) --Adon Lunar (talk) 11:56, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

The information which is given in my article is accurate and it's relationship between Muslim women and hindu men where many Muslim women was in relationships with hindu men and and the Muslim women relationship with hindu men was not known to theirs Muslim male family members expect in few cases but female members know about it. Adon Lunar (talk) 12:01, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello, I'm JalenFolf. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Niyoga. Please do not do this. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. As a rule, if you discover a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If a page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you wish to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jalen Folf  (talk)  10:04, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Doug Weller talk 16:52, 16 February 2021 (UTC)