User talk:Adproductionguy

Welcome
Hello  and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Ukexpat and I would like to thank you for your contributions.  ''Click here to reply to this message.''  ukexpat (talk) 14:55, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:IMD Group (July 19)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. . Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sionk (talk) 00:26, 19 July 2014 (UTC)
 * To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Adproductionguy Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sionk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User_talk:Adproductionguy reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.


 * Thanks for your message on my Talk page. I'll reply here, which seems to be the logical place to continue the conversation. Your draft article is not the worst I've seen, it is well structured, fairly succinct and you've obviously mastered inline citations (which is helpful for us reviewers). I declined it as "advertising", I think the largely unsourced sections from "Services" onwards sounded too much like you were plugging IMD's products. The introductory paragraph sounds a bit jargon-y and doesn't set things off on a good footing.
 * Looking at it again, however, I may have been a bit harsh and the advert-iness is not as bad as I first thought. All the same, subjects need to be shown to be widely known and/or important. the 'notability' criteria for companies is generally a bit higher and we like to see at least one good example of general news coverage (rather than specialist news and media outlets). A few of your news articles give a few lines to IMD, I don't think that's enough on its own.
 * Things also need to at least be verifiable. There's several of your citations which do not verify the facts/claims they are next to. For example source 3, next to the early history of the company, is a profile of Charles Dunstone that doesn't even mention IMD, let alone when it was founded. Source 12, next to "IMD Cloud", is about IMD's takeover of eBus. I would point out too that Business Highbeam is a searchable archive of news articles, the article found via Business Highbeam is actually in Music Week magazine.
 * So there's a lot of things to consider, avoid sounding promotional and prove the subject (IMD) is widely known, suitable for an encyclopedia. Hope that helps! Sionk (talk) 09:57, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Draft:IMD Group concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:IMD Group, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Draft:IMD Group concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:IMD Group, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:IMD Group


Hello, Adproductionguy. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "IMD Group".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the  or  code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code:, paste it in the edit box at this link , and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:45, 3 May 2015 (UTC)