User talk:Adrian22

Confusion re Image:Alleycandle.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Alleycandle.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 13:11, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

hi - I believe the proper licensing categorization has now been applied - cheers, Ad

Fair use rationale for Image:AllisonCrowe191l.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:AllisonCrowe191l.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 13:07, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

hi - I believe the proper licensing categorization has now been applied to this, and all images submitted - cheers, Ad

Image:AllisonCrowecandle.JPG
I have tagged Image:AllisonCrowecandle.JPG as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 13:08, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

hi - As noted above, I believe the proper licensing categorization has now been applied - cheers, Ad

Image:AllisonCroweTidingsGrabbedFrame_3.jpg
I have tagged Image:AllisonCroweTidingsGrabbedFrame_3.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 13:09, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

hi - As noted for the other images, I believe the proper licensing categorization has now been applied - cheers, Ad

Image:AllisonCroweLittleLightalbumcover.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:AllisonCroweLittleLightalbumcover.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. SkierRMH ( talk ) 01:43, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Ok. Just saw this note. I don't check things all that regularly. Most definitely, though, we release Allison Crowe's music and album cover and more under CC licenses and - overall, there should be no copyright concerns with any of our music or images etc. I do believe Evil Spartan has kindly ensured it's all legit. I'll now go to the page you recommend. cheers, Adrian (Allison Crowe Music 250-537-1286 or management@allisoncrowe.com )


 * Hi, thanks for your note. Yes, it seems this has been settled. The image has in fact technically been deleted here on en-wiki, but has been uploaded on commons.wikimedia.org instead, so that all other wikipedias can also use it, and your permission has been duly registered there, so all is well. Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:27, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

excellent, thanks! this can all be a bit confusing, so, I'm happy to hear with the input from all quarters, things are as they they should be! Adrian

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 12:27, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

hi, no I did not know that's how you sign - thanks 75.155.188.160 (talk) 01:36, 12 January 2009 (UTC) Ad

Hallelujah (Leonard Cohen song)
Regarding this edit &mdash; why is that flawed? Rufus Wainwright's version has not sold more than Alexandra Burke's version, solely by the fact that Rufus Wainwright's version has never been released as a single nor bought by many as a download. It has never charted. Burke's version, in my opinion quite unfortunately, was officially the biggest selling single in the UK in the whole of 2008. Wainwright's version on the other hand only attained sales as part of the Shrek soundtrack and to judge that as more sales would constitute original research (e.g. I'm sure the large majority of people bought the album for the other twelve tracks too). I'm restoring the information. Stripping it out is an incredibly pointless exercise the lead should fully reflect the article. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 09:09, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Confusion re File:AllisonCroweLisasSong.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AllisonCroweLisasSong.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org], stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to [mailto:permissions-en@wikimedia.org permissions-en@wikimedia.org].

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  MBisanz  talk 01:57, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

OK, we are the creators and holders of all rights for this cover image. I have re-uploaded it, and, I trust, have appropriately tagged it now. Thanks

Confusion re File:AllisonCroweLisasSong.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AllisonCroweLisasSong.jpg I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NW ( Talk ) 21:27, 26 August 2009 (UTC)

Confusion re File:AllisonCroweNewfoundlandVinylalbumfrontcover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:AllisonCroweNewfoundlandVinylalbumfrontcover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Blurred   Lines  06:13, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

I'll revisit the pic page. I thought I'd posted it correctly for free content. cheers, Adrian

NB - As well as writing to permissions as specified, a note permitting reuse under the free license CC-BY-SA has been made at the site of the original publication - specifically this note is prominently posted @ http://allisoncrowe.com/images.htm and http://allisoncrowe.com/images2.htm Adrian22 (talk) 08:28, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Confusion re File:SpiralAllisonCrowealbumcover.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:SpiralAllisonCrowealbumcover.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Blurred   Lines  06:18, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

It should be free content - and I thought that's how I posted it. I'll revisit and fix things I spot. cheers, Adrian

NB - As well as writing to permissions as specified, a note permitting reuse under the free license CC-BY-SA has been made at the site of the original publication - specifically this note is prominently posted @ http://allisoncrowe.com/images.htm and http://allisoncrowe.com/images2.htm Adrian22 (talk) 08:30, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Confusion re File:Musician Allison Crowe on the red carpet for "Man of Steel" World Premiere, Lincoln Center, New York City, June 10, 2013.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Musician Allison Crowe on the red carpet for "Man of Steel" World Premiere, Lincoln Center, New York City, June 10, 2013.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Blurred   Lines  06:24, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

I took the photograph - and thought I'd entered all the info correctly. I'll revisit the page and see if I can get it done correctly! cheers, Adrian

p.s. I see there is a notice on that page which confusingly states:

"This file is missing evidence of permission. It is attributed to someone other than the uploader, or to an external site which the uploader claims to represent or own, and while a licensing tag has been applied, there is no proof that the author has agreed to release the file under the given license."

I say that is confusing - as I am, indeed, the uploader and the pic is attributed to me. I shall keep looking at these notices - but, on reading this, I am unclear as to why someone or aomething would think that I am not the photographer and uploader. Any explanation is welecome, thanks, Ad

NB - As well as writing to permissions as specified, a note permitting reuse under the free license CC-BY-SA has been made at the site of the original publication - specifically this note is prominently posted @ http://allisoncrowe.com/images.htm and http://allisoncrowe.com/images2.htm Unfortunately, this specific image file has already been deleted by Wikipedia user "Diannaa" who advises that it takes weeks under the current backlog for such files to be restored. Accordingly, I/we hope things are clear going forward. Adrian22 (talk) 08:34, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Confusion re File:AllisonCroweNewfoundlandVinylalbumbackcover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:AllisonCroweNewfoundlandVinylalbumbackcover.jpg, which you've attributed to non-free album cover. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 23:17, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

To simplify, Diana, it would be fine if there's a week after the pics are flagged - as I'd tend things. My intention was for the free use of the files uploaded - and any/all such files I've uploaded I have the full rights and authority to do so. The language of what's required can be confusing, and things can be further complicated if there is haste in deletion - as happened with the one image of Allison Crowe at the Man of Steel World Premiere red carpet - which was deleted August 19, 2013, the same day it's flagged, and, after I'd submitted an email to Wikipedia permissions. Diana, you've explained that it can take weeks to restore these deletions due to a back-log. Rather than making hasty deletions which don't serve people well, please allow for the flags/notifications to be addressed. Thank you, Adrian du Plessis

NB - As well as writing to permissions as specified, a note permitting reuse under the free license CC-BY-SA has been made at the site of the original publication - specifically this note is prominently posted @ http://allisoncrowe.com/images.htm and http://allisoncrowe.com/images2.htm Adrian22 (talk) 08:36, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Confusion re File:Allison Crowe, Jazzlokal Mampf, Frankfurt, Germany, Oct 2012.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Allison Crowe, Jazzlokal Mampf, Frankfurt, Germany, Oct 2012.jpg, which you've attributed to photographer Billie Woods. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 23:18, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

To simplify, Diana, it would be fine if there's a week after the pics are flagged - as I'd tend things. My intention was for the free use of the files uploaded - and any/all such files I've uploaded I have the full rights and authority to do so. The language of what's required can be confusing, and things can be further complicated if there is haste in deletion - as happened with the one image of Allison Crowe at the Man of Steel World Premiere red carpet - which was deleted August 19, 2013, the same day it's flagged, and, after I'd submitted an email to Wikipedia permissions. Diana, you've explained that it can take weeks to restore these deletions due to a back-log. Rather than making hasty deletions which don't serve people well, please allow for the flags/notifications to be addressed. Thank you, Adrian du Plessis

NB - As well as writing to permissions as specified, a note permitting reuse under the free license CC-BY-SA has been made at the site of the original publication - specifically this note is prominently posted @ http://allisoncrowe.com/images.htm and http://allisoncrowe.com/images2.htm Adrian22 (talk) 08:37, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Confusion re File:AllisonCroweEuropegreen.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:AllisonCroweEuropegreen.JPG, which you've attributed to photographer Billie Woods. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 23:18, 19 August 2013 (UTC)

To simplify, Diana, it would be fine if there's a week after the pics are flagged - as I'd tend things. My intention was for the free use of the files uploaded - and any/all such files I've uploaded I have the full rights and authority to do so. The language of what's required can be confusing, and things can be further complicated if there is haste in deletion - as happened with the one image of Allison Crowe at the Man of Steel World Premiere red carpet - which was deleted August 19, 2013, the same day it's flagged, and, after I'd submitted an email to Wikipedia permissions. Diana, you've explained that it can take weeks to restore these deletions due to a back-log. Rather than making hasty deletions which don't serve people well, please allow for the flags/notifications to be addressed. Thank you, Adrian du Plessis

NB - As well as writing to permissions as specified, a note permitting reuse under the free license CC-BY-SA has been made at the site of the original publication - specifically this note is prominently posted @ http://allisoncrowe.com/images.htm and http://allisoncrowe.com/images2.htm Adrian22 (talk) 08:38, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

Discussion on the Conflict of Interest noticeboard
Adrian22, please see this discussion on the Conflict of Interest noticeboard. You may wish to comment there, but please read WP:COI first. Thanks. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:09, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

I shall do, thanks. There's much to read - and learn about how things work! Adrian22 (talk) 19:42, 20 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)