User talk:AdrianLozano/QFT

For some obscure reason, I've been following the revert war on User:Ford1206's talk page. Ford1206 has a habit of removing every comment, warning or block on his page. A cursory glance of the page's [history] reveals a plethora of warnings. However, since they are continuously removed, it's hard to get a clear picture of what's actually going on. I got curious, so I killed a couple of minutes and added all additions and removed all removals, so to speak. What follows is the resulting page, more or less like it should have looked. – Adrian Lozano (talk) 23:46, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

I AM A WINNER I AM A WINNER BIGGER WINNER THAN YOU....

October 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Martin Anderson, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Martin Anderson was changed by Ford1206 (c) (t) deleting 29726 characters on 2007-10-16T22:08:02+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot 22:08, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia  as a result of your . You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Your activity on this article is very disruptive. Please stop removing cited material. Cool Hand Luke 01:24, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

in the martin anderson page i have made and added facts about him and relevant saying about him. some of you dont like what i say and its ok to block me well fuck you cluebot and any other assholes. i live here and i have found things about him. like the reason why he was at the boot camp, what his parents really care about( money) was not him, if this was the case he would not have been in the boot camp to begin with. the DI's did not beat him to death, this is proven in court and by the autoposies, he was melingureing and was not forced to run. he was encouraged to restart and join everyone else. his parents knew about the sickle cell trait and it was never put on the med form when he entered the camp. his parents are known criminals themselves, and he was also one and a known gang member. us tax payers should get the money back from his parents or it should go to his grandmother who raised him. SO IF YOU DONT LIKE FACTS GO FUCK OFF............

October 2007
Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Gscshoyru 16:12, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Blocked You have been blocked for 1 week for using your user page to make personal attacks against other editors (a violation of WP:USER). To contest this block, add the text  on this page, along with an explanation of why you believe this block to be unjustified. You can also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list. Please be sure to include your username (if you have one) and IP address in your email.

Caknuck 21:07, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Please don't remove your previous unblock requests. If you do that once more, this page might be protected to prevent further abuse. Max S em 15:43, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

this what not me that did this...it was not from my user name.

if you say it is then show proof, if you cant then unblock me.............

then show proof............IT might have come from IP address but not from my username.......

show the proof............


 * Both unblock denials have provided the proof, but only admins can read you saying "so astronaut,derhexer, shoeofdeath, and anyone else can go fuck off". Don't request unblock again; your block will expire at 21:04 October 27. --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 16:03, 21 October 2007 (UTC)

this was not me that said that.............

i do not deserve to be blocked.............

I AM A WINNER


 * jpgordon's diff shows you made the personal attack from your account. That's all the proof needed to deny your unblock request. Caknuck 01:44, 23 October 2007 (UTC)

is it ok now to do my talk page or will i be blocked again.......

i am a winner

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Tabercil (talk) 03:25, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. The next time you insert a spam link, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Tabercil (talk) 16:35, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

Edit warring occurs when individual editors or groups of editors repeatedly revert content edits to a page or subject area. Such hostile behavior is prohibited, and considered a breach of Wikiquette. Since it is an attempt to win a content dispute through brute force, edit warring undermines the consensus-building process that underlies the ideal wiki collaborative spirit.

Wikipedia works best when people with opposing opinions work together to find common ground. Neutral point of view advises that all significant views can and should be documented proportionally. An edit war is the opposite of this, with two sides each fighting to make their version the only one.

March 2008
Martin Anderson controversy reverted due to removal of external links. --Non-dropframe (talk) 22:02, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

response
hey there, "anoymous", While I apologize for that blog, (I admit that I was wrong on that) the other sites are acceptable in my opinion. You should go to that article's talk page to discuss it. Thanks, --Non-dropframe (talk) 22:16, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:13, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

Martin Anderson Article
look, Ford1206, you need to learn to spell "anonymous" before you leave posts unsigned. I understand what your opinion is and I've already conceded your point about the blog. As far as his guilt goes, it is not your place to draw conclusions in the context of an encyclopedia. Again, please discuss this on the article's Talk Page. Thanks, --Non-dropframe (talk) 19:56, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

third and final response
You can stop signing "anonymous". I've known from the beginning who you are. Your 'point' failed miserably and I will no longer dignify your ignorance with a response. I should note that the only reason I added a message to your user talk page was due to the ALL CAPS edit summary in which you seemed rather upset. I added the note so that you could re-edit the page without the edit I wound objectionable.

--Non-dropframe (talk) 21:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

final comment
And so ends the saga. Thanks for the mature final comments there, Ford1206. If any good came out of this, it's that Ford finally learned to spell "anonymous." --Non-dropframe (talk) 18:52, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

March 2008
Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Non-dropframe (talk) 22:14, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Please stop reverting my page. The comment was entitled "final" because it was supposed to be the end of the conversation. I'm just trying to let it go but you keep coming back with another unprofessional and immature comment. Furthermore, unless you're a good looking girl between the ages of 16 and 18, I'm not your "sweetie" and request that you cease addressing me as such. In short, let it go and stop acting like a five year old. The tag I placed on your was the closest thing I could find to STOP REVERTING MY PAGE.

If I have to get an admin involved, I will. --Non-dropframe (talk) 00:41, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Yes...I suppose I would be a pedophile...If I weren't 18 myself. I will now discontinue posting on your page assuming that THIS is THE LAST message. By the way, the name calling is unnecessary. END CONVERSATION.--Non-dropframe (talk) 00:47, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:15, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Being nasty is not nice
Here it all is:
 * There is a policy called WP:CIVIL, which says in a nutshell: "Participate in a respectful and civil way. Do not ignore the positions and conclusions of others. Try to discourage others from being uncivil, and be careful to avoid offending people unintentionally."
 * You do need to cite your sources, because of the Verifiability policy, which says in a nutshell: Material challenged or likely to be challenged, and all quotations, must be attributed to a reliable, published source.
 * For instance, on the medcab Martin Anderson request page, you said you knew some of the officers involved. You are a primary source that requires a secondary source (because it needs to be substantiated), so there has to be evidence that you know the officers. I'm sure other people know the officers too, and their opinions are in local newspapers, etc. Those would make for good citations.
 * Policies should be followed. They are not hard rules, but that doesn't mean you should ignore them. Everyone here basically agrees on the fundamentals.

You don't need to read through all the policy pages, just have a quick glance over. I'm assuming good faith here; you may be very passionate about the controversy, or you may feel it is logical that an article should be one way, and not others. That's fine and good, but you need to work towards making the article nice, and reaching some form of consensus.

This is a bit of a warning. Past this, editors will start going to admin noticeboards and complaining about you, and then you'll be banned. So keep a cool head, blahblahblah, and just help the article out. If you believe the article needs help, fix it, but someone is gonna be there complaining; someone is going to be really angry if you continue to do things the way you have been when everyone says "don't do this!" Xavexgoem (talk) 16:52, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Ford1206, please stop removing text from the "Martin Lee Anderson Controversy" article. Your unsourced edits simply delete the content of the article, which says that there was coercion, a public outcry, a disagreement about what caused Anderson's death, and allegations of racism. That controversy is the subject of the article. If you disagree, please provide factual documentation; be respectful and fair with other editors, even when you disagree.Fconaway (talk) 06:38, 4 September 2008 (UTC)


 * This is from The Five Pillars of Wikipedia: Wikipedia has a neutral point of view, which means we strive for articles that advocate no single point of view. Sometimes this requires representing multiple points of view, presenting each point of view accurately, providing context for any given point of view, and presenting no one point of view as "the truth" or "the best view." It means citing verifiable, authoritative sources whenever possible, especially on controversial topics. When a conflict arises regarding neutrality, declare a cool-down period and tag the article as disputed, hammer out details on the talk page, and follow dispute resolution.Fconaway (talk) 17:28, 5 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Constructive contributions are appreciated and strongly encouraged, but your recent edit to the userpage of another user may be considered vandalism. If you are the user, please log in under that account and proceed to make the changes. Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Please use the editors's talk page to make comments about their edits, not their user page. ww2censor (talk) 20:12, 7 September 2008 (UTC)

Your recent edits
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 17:45, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Please do not deface other people's user page
The proper place for your comments to a user is their talk page, not their user page. Please refrain from defacing other people's user page. Billollib (talk) 12:06, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Please stop vandalizing my user page
Once again, a contributor's user page is not the appropriate place for your comments. The appropriate place to put comments is in the discussion section. Please refrain from vandalizing my user page. Billollib (talk) 23:40, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

Please put your comments in an appropriate section
You placed your comment in a section that had nothing to do with your comment. Please either use an appropriate section or add another section. Please do not, however, add random comments in other sections. Billollib (talk) 23:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text below. &mdash; slakr \ talk / 16:22, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

what?????

abusing power?

It is not permitted to remove notices from your talk page. Please do not do so. If you do you may be blocked again. DJ Clayworth (talk) 21:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

leave me alone i want this off my page. where does it say notices must remian

the blcok is still in effect

leave me alone where does it say notices need to remain.\

LEAVE ME ALONE WHERE DOES IT SAY NOTICES MUST REMAIN

MY PAGE

I AM A WINNER I AM A WINNER BIGGER WINNER THAN YOU....

yes you dj clayworth>>>>

Re: Talk page reversion
Sorry I meant to respond to that sooner but I deleted it cleaning up my talk page. I'm not sure why I reverted it, most likely a mistake on my part while on RC patrol (thought the block was still on). ~ Ttony21(talk, contribs) 03:13, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Please remember when you are editing talk pages to sign your contributions. Please use four tildes like this ~ DJ Clayworth (talk) 15:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments on my talk page. They have been noted. DJ Clayworth (talk) 23:44, 7 November 2008 (UTC)