User talk:Adriana7856

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 13)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Eagleash were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Adriana7856/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Adriana7856/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Eagleash&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Adriana7856/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 00:20, 13 December 2022 (UTC)


 * Hello Eagleash
 * I do not understand where is the problem with my article, the content is correct, so I guess (I am not computer literate) that something is wrong with my references (it is not using Wikipedia way). I tried to fix it in last 24 hours, in order to match Wikipedia style.
 * Links provided (Informational notes) can be easily verified and are belongs to authorities (Luxembourg and Romanian government). I've also added Citations using "Cite -> Templates" you are providing in Source Editor of page.
 * Please be kind and approve it. I am student (master, last year) and my grade is fully dependent about the article I am trying to publish here. If will be declined, I won't pass examination and will loose 2 years. I worked hard to collect and present all the info in this article. Information are correct, true and accurate. There is no reason to be rejected.
 * Before to reject my article again, please have in mind few things:
 * - I need to understand where is the problem, so want to please you to explain me clear WHERE is the mistake (instead to reject it with standard message). don't let me crawl in the dark, to guess where is the problem
 * - I am not computer literate, I do not have technical knowledge, I was not trained to learn HTML/XML, tags, webdesign or web development and I do not have time to become a power user in editing a Wikipedia page
 * - without this article published, I won't be able to grade.
 * Thanks in advance for your help and understanding.
 * Adriana Adriana7856 (talk) 20:42, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
 * The issue really is that the article as submitted does not represent a usable encyclopedic entry; this is why you were directed to the three pages that can hep you. WP:YFA outlines what is required in an acceptable article, WP:MOS tells you the layout and formatting to use and WP:REFB tells you how to correctly add citations. The page WP:ASSIGN may also be of assistance to you and also to your 'tutors'. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia published in the public domain and should not be used as a course assignment. It is not a form of social media nor a personal blog. If you care to research some articles on similar topics (assuming they exist) you may get a feel for how Wikipedia is laid out and structured. I note that the item has been re-submitted but without much improvement. I shall not review again myself but one of my colleagues on the AfC panel should do so shortly. Eagleash (talk) 22:09, 14 December 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 15)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Rich Smith were:

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Adriana7856/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Adriana7856/sandbox Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rich_Smith&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=User:Adriana7856/sandbox reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

- Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 01:18, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:Adriana7856/sandbox
Hello, Adriana7856. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Adriana7856/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:02, 19 May 2023 (UTC)