User talk:Adrianberti

Speedy deletion nomination of La Comedia Puertorriqueña


A tag has been placed on La Comedia Puertorriqueña, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
 * It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.
 * It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris talk! 21:50, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Copyright
It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account. Certainly we can't accept text previously published on a web site which has a copyright notice saying "Todos los derechos reservados", as in the case of material you have posted. JBW (talk) 22:14, 23 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello, this is Adrianberti and I would like to request the undeletion of this draft deleted under section G11 . Please restore the page so that I can make the final edits and add references to it. The page was not finished yet, it was a draft and we accidentally hit the publish button. The information regarding the history and achievements of our theater company was written by me for out webpage www.lacomediapr.com (About our company)Thank you. Adrianberti (talk) 18:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * You can't have it both ways. If you reserve all rights to the material, as stated on your website, then you can't release it on Wikipedia under licensing terms which allow anyone at all to reuse that material, unchanged or modified in any way whatsoever, for any purpose whatsoever, subject only to attribution, which is what you do for anything you post to Wikipedia. JBW (talk) 21:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm confused. Where on our website is it stated that we reserve all rights to the material? Adrianberti (talk) 14:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Text which I deleted appears on the page https://prpop.org/biografias/sandra-rivera/ at the bottom of which appears the copyright notice "Todos los derechos reservados © 2020 Fundación Nacional para la Cultura Popular." If in fact that is not true, and the owners of that website are making a false claim to rights over your material, then you may like to take it up with them. However, Wikipedia's policy is to require proof that material is either in the public domain or published under a free license, and we don't just assume that it is. JBW (talk) 15:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
 * JBW:
 * Understood. Thank you. Adrianberti (talk) 18:42, 25 April 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia's guideline on conflict of interest, and related matters
Hello, Adrianberti. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about, as for example on the pages Sandra Rivera and La Comedia Puertorriqueña, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the edit COI template)—don't forget to give details of reliable sources supporting your suggestions;
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see );
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see );
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. JBW (talk) 21:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)